Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1725155

Materials Data on InGaS3 by Materials Project

Abstract

InGaS3 crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is two-dimensional and consists of one InGaS3 sheet oriented in the (0, 0, 1) direction. there are five inequivalent In3+ sites. In the first In3+ site, In3+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form InS6 octahedra that share corners with two InS4 tetrahedra, corners with three GaS4 tetrahedra, and edges with six InS6 octahedra. There are a spread of In–S bond distances ranging from 2.55–2.73 Å. In the second In3+ site, In3+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form InS6 octahedra that share corners with two InS4 tetrahedra, corners with three GaS4 tetrahedra, and edges with six InS6 octahedra. There are a spread of In–S bond distances ranging from 2.54–2.74 Å. In the third In3+ site, In3+ is bonded to six S2- atoms to form InS6 octahedra that share corners with two InS4 tetrahedra, corners with three GaS4 tetrahedra, and edges with six InS6 octahedra. There are a spread of In–S bond distances ranging from 2.55–2.75 Å. In the fourth In3+ site, In3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form InS4 tetrahedra that share corners with three InS6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent InS4 tetrahedra, and corners with three equivalent GaS4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 54–58°. There are a spread of In–S bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.52 Å. In the fifth In3+ site, In3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form InS4 tetrahedra that share corners with three InS6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent InS4 tetrahedra, and corners with three equivalent GaS4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–57°. There are a spread of In–S bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.52 Å. There are five inequivalent Ga3+ sites. In the first Ga3+ site, Ga3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form GaS4 tetrahedra that share corners with three InS6 octahedra and corners with five GaS4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 59–63°. There are a spread of Ga–S bond distances ranging from 2.23–2.52 Å. In the second Ga3+ site, Ga3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form GaS4 tetrahedra that share corners with three InS6 octahedra and corners with five GaS4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 59–64°. There are a spread of Ga–S bond distances ranging from 2.23–2.52 Å. In the third Ga3+ site, Ga3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form corner-sharing GaS4 tetrahedra. There are three shorter (2.28 Å) and one longer (2.48 Å) Ga–S bond lengths. In the fourth Ga3+ site, Ga3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form corner-sharing GaS4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Ga–S bond distances ranging from 2.27–2.49 Å. In the fifth Ga3+ site, Ga3+ is bonded to four S2- atoms to form GaS4 tetrahedra that share corners with three InS6 octahedra and corners with six InS4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–56°. There are one shorter (2.28 Å) and three longer (2.33 Å) Ga–S bond lengths. There are fifteen inequivalent S2- sites. In the first S2- site, S2- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to two Ga3+ atoms. In the second S2- site, S2- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to two Ga3+ atoms. In the third S2- site, S2- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to two Ga3+ atoms. In the fourth S2- site, S2- is bonded to three In3+ and one Ga3+ atom to form distorted corner-sharing SIn3Ga tetrahedra. In the fifth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three In3+ atoms. In the sixth S2- site, S2- is bonded to three In3+ and one Ga3+ atom to form distorted corner-sharing SIn3Ga tetrahedra. In the seventh S2- site, S2- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two In3+ and one Ga3+ atom. In the eighth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two In3+ and one Ga3+ atom. In the ninth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two In3+ and one Ga3+ atom. In the tenth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four In3+ atoms. In the eleventh S2- site, S2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four In3+ atoms. In the twelfth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three In3+ and one Ga3+ atom. In the thirteenth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Ga3+ atoms. In the fourteenth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to two Ga3+ atoms. In the fifteenth S2- site, S2- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Ga3+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on InGaS3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1725155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗