Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1688157

Materials Data on LiFeF3 by Materials Project

Abstract

LiFeF3 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with two FeF6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent FeF7 pentagonal bipyramids, corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra, and edges with two FeF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 67–70°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.85–1.91 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form distorted LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with four FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one FeF7 pentagonal bipyramid, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid, and an edgeedge with one FeF7 pentagonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 36–61°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.79–2.05 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form distorted LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with four FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one FeF7 pentagonal bipyramid, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid, and an edgeedge with one FeF7 pentagonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 34–62°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.78–2.08 Å. There are three inequivalent Fe2+ sites. In the first Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to seven F1- atoms to form distorted FeF7 pentagonal bipyramids that share corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiF4 trigonal pyramids, edges with four FeF6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeF7 pentagonal bipyramids, and edges with two LiF4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.37 Å. In the second Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form distorted FeF6 octahedra that share corners with four LiF4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid, edges with two equivalent FeF6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeF7 pentagonal bipyramids, and an edgeedge with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.30 Å. In the third Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form distorted FeF6 octahedra that share corners with four LiF4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid, edges with two equivalent FeF6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeF7 pentagonal bipyramids, and an edgeedge with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.28 Å. There are nine inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing FLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing FLiFe3 trigonal pyramids. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing FLiFe3 trigonal pyramids. In the eighth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the ninth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on LiFeF3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1688157

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗