Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1675499

Materials Data on LiFeF3 by Materials Project

Abstract

LiFeF3 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are nine inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with three FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, and a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–65°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.80–1.94 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with three FeF6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent FeF6 pentagonal pyramids, and corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 57–67°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.84–2.01 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with two FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one FeF6 pentagonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 45–73°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.86–2.00 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one FeF6 pentagonal pyramid, and a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 52–74°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.85–2.08 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with three FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, and a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–65°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.82–1.91 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with three FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one FeF6 pentagonal pyramid, and corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 27–63°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.85–1.93 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with three equivalent FeF6 octahedra and corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–63°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.79–1.93 Å. In the eighth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with three FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one FeF6 pentagonal pyramid, and corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 61–65°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.80–2.00 Å. In the ninth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four F1- atoms. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.87–1.97 Å. There are nine inequivalent Fe2+ sites. In the first Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form distorted FeF6 octahedra that share corners with three LiF4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent LiF4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with two FeF6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.26 Å. In the second Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form FeF6 octahedra that share corners with four LiF4 tetrahedra, edges with two FeF6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one FeF6 pentagonal pyramid. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.30 Å. In the third Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form distorted FeF6 octahedra that share corners with six LiF4 tetrahedra, edges with two FeF6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one FeF6 pentagonal pyramid. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.20 Å. In the fourth Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form FeF6 octahedra that share corners with six LiF4 tetrahedra and edges with two FeF6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.27 Å. In the fifth Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to five F1- atoms. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.22 Å. In the sixth Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven F1- atoms. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.73 Å. In the seventh Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six F1- atoms. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.39 Å. In the eighth Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form distorted FeF6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with five LiF4 tetrahedra, edges with two FeF6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiF4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.40 Å. In the ninth Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six F1- atoms. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.51 Å. There are twenty-seven inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form distorted corner-sharing FLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing FLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing FLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the eighth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the ninth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms. In the tenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the eleventh F1- site, F1- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing FLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the twelfth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the thirteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the fourteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms. In the fifteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the sixteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the seventeenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the eighteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the nineteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the twentieth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the twenty-first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the twenty-second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms. In the twenty-third F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to one Li1+ and two Fe2+ atoms. In the twenty-fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the twenty-fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the twenty-sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom. In the twenty-seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on LiFeF3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1675499

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗