Campus Capability Plan

Adams, C.; Arsenlis, T.; Bailey, A.; Bergman, M.; Brase, J.; Brenner, J.; Camara, L.; Carlton, H.; Cheng, J.; Chrzanowski, P.; Colson, J.; East, D.; Farrell, J.; Ferranti, L.; Gursahani, A.; Hansen, R.; Helms, L. L.; Hernandez, M.; Jeffries, J.; Larson, D.; Lu, K.; McNabb, D.; Mercer, M.; Skeate, M.; Sueksdorf, M.; Zucca, B.; Le, D.; Ancria, R.; Scott, J.; Leininger, L.; Gagliardi, F.; Gash, A.; Bronson, M.; Chung, B.; Hobson, B.; Meeker, J.; Sanchez, J.; Zagar, M.; Quivey, B.; Sommer, S.; Atherton, J.

doi:10.2172/1374521

Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1374521

Campus Capability Plan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Campus Capability Plan for 2018-2028. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) is one of three national laboratories that are part of the National Nuclear Security Administration. LLNL provides critical expertise to strengthen U.S. security through development and application of world-class science and technology that: Ensures the safety, reliability, and performance of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile; Promotes international nuclear safety and nonproliferation; Reduces global danger from weapons of mass destruction; Supports U.S. leadership in science and technology. Essential to the execution and continued advancement of these mission areas are responsive infrastructure capabilities. This report showcases each LLNL capability area and describes the mission, science, and technology efforts enabled by LLNL infrastructure, as well as future infrastructure plans.

Explore related subjects

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE 38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY 42 ENGINEERING 59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Adams, C., Arsenlis, T., Bailey, A., Bergman, M., Brase, J., Brenner, J., Camara, L., Carlton, H., Cheng, J., Chrzanowski, P., Colson, J., East, D., Farrell, J., Ferranti, L., Gursahani, A., Hansen, R., Helms, L. L., Hernandez, M., Jeffries, J., Larson, D., Lu, K., McNabb, D., Mercer, M., Skeate, M., Sueksdorf, M., Zucca, B., Le, D., Ancria, R., Scott, J., Leininger, L., Gagliardi, F., Gash, A., Bronson, M., Chung, B., Hobson, B., Meeker, J., Sanchez, J., Zagar, M., Quivey, B., Sommer, S., Atherton, J.. 2017-06-06. Campus Capability Plan. https://doi.org/10.2172/1374521

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF TITANIUM-ZIRCONIUM-MOLYBDENUM ALLOY USING ELECTRON BEAM POWDER BED FUSION

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2026

ZiaCore Critical Experiment Demonstrates Key Technologies for Nuclear Energy Systems

ZiaCore is a LANL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project focused on developing and demonstrating key technologies for future nuclear energy systems. The project itself was split into three tasks: 1) Design of the ZiaCore Reactor, a UO2 fueled, graphite and zirconium-hydride (ZrH) moderated, heat pipe cooled micro-reactor 2) Development of the ZrH and heat pipes components 3) Performance of a critical experiment with a representative portion of the ZiaCore reactor incorporating the ZrH and heat pipes developed and made at LANL.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2026

Operating Experience Data Analysis for Digital Instrumentation and Control System Reliability and Risk Assessment in Nuclear Power Plants

The implementation of advanced digital instrumentation and control (DI&C) systems in U.S. nuclear power plants (NPPs) can bring significant advancements in reliability, monitoring, and control capabilities. However, these systems also introduce new challenges, particularly in assessing risks such as common-cause failures (CCFs) and establishing robust reliability estimates for DI&C components. Addressing these challenges is critical for ensuring the safe and efficient operation of NPPs. Recently, Idaho National Laboratory was tasked by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to conduct a DI&C reliability study using operating experience data from the nuclear industry. The two operating experience data sources for the study are the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations’ Industry Reporting and Information System (IRIS) and the NRC’s Licensee Event Report database which is hosted at Idaho National Laboratory at https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx. This report provides a comprehensive examination of DI&C systems, including their architecture, operational advantages, and associated challenges. It reviews existing industry DI&C studies and failure mode taxonomies, along with reliability data from various industries. Through a detailed analysis of these databases, the study provides insights into DI&C system performance. Considerations should be given to incorporate DI&C failure data into the NRC's Integrated Data Collection and Coding System and updating the Reliability and Availability Data System to support ongoing DI&C reliability studies. Recommendations are also provided for modeling DI&C reliability and CCF in probabilistic risk assessment, thereby supporting risk-informed decision-making and enhancing the reliability and safety of NPPs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗