Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1304407

Materials Data on Li2FeF5 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2FeF5 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pbam space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to five F1- atoms to form distorted LiF5 trigonal bipyramids that share corners with three FeF6 octahedra and an edgeedge with one FeF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–68°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.83–2.14 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to five F1- atoms. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.39 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four F1- atoms. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.18 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three F1- atoms. There is one shorter (1.87 Å) and two longer (2.06 Å) Li–F bond length. There are two inequivalent Fe3+ sites. In the first Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form FeF6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF5 trigonal bipyramid, and an edgeedge with one LiF5 trigonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 14°. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.88–1.98 Å. In the second Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form FeF6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeF6 octahedra and corners with two equivalent LiF5 trigonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 14°. There are a spread of Fe–F bond distances ranging from 1.93–1.98 Å. There are seven inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a bent 150 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to two equivalent Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded to three Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom to form distorted edge-sharing FLi3Fe tetrahedra. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a linear geometry to one Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom. In the seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted linear geometry to two Fe3+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-08-03. Materials Data on Li2FeF5 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1304407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗