Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1297193

Materials Data on Li2Si2NiO6 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2NiSi2O6 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pmn2_1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.82–2.31 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.16–2.49 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to five O2- atoms to form distorted LiO5 square pyramids that share a cornercorner with one NiO6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO5 square pyramid, corners with four SiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one NiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one SiO4 tetrahedra, and a faceface with one NiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 70°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.05–2.37 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.74 Å. There are three inequivalent Ni2+ sites. In the first Ni2+ site, Ni2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form NiO6 octahedra that share corners with six SiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO5 square pyramids, and faces with two NiO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.16 Å. In the second Ni2+ site, Ni2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form NiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO5 square pyramids, corners with six SiO4 tetrahedra, and a faceface with one NiO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 2.07–2.33 Å. In the third Ni2+ site, Ni2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted NiO6 octahedra that share corners with six SiO4 tetrahedra, a faceface with one NiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO5 square pyramids. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.34 Å. There are four inequivalent Si4+ sites. In the first Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three NiO6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO5 square pyramids, and corners with two equivalent SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 24–56°. There are a spread of Si–O bond distances ranging from 1.61–1.66 Å. In the second Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three NiO6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO5 square pyramids, and corners with two equivalent SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 24–57°. There are a spread of Si–O bond distances ranging from 1.61–1.66 Å. In the third Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three NiO6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO5 square pyramid, and corners with two SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–46°. There is three shorter (1.62 Å) and one longer (1.65 Å) Si–O bond length. In the fourth Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three NiO6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO5 square pyramid, corners with two SiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO5 square pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–44°. There is three shorter (1.62 Å) and one longer (1.66 Å) Si–O bond length. There are eleven inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Li1+, two Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Li1+, two Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, two Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+ and two Si4+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi2Si2 trigonal pyramids. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+ and two Si4+ atoms to form distorted OLi2Si2 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi2SiNi tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent OLi2Si2 trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi2Si2 tetrahedra. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Li1+, one Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Ni2+, and one Si4+ atom to form distorted corner-sharing OLi2SiNi tetrahedra. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted linear geometry to one Li1+ and two Si4+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-30. Materials Data on Li2Si2NiO6 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1297193

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗