Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1293516

Materials Data on Li5MnO3F by Materials Project

Abstract

Li5MnO3F crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are ten inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to two O2- and two F1- atoms to form distorted LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids that share corners with two equivalent MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one MnO3F tetrahedra, and edges with two LiO3F tetrahedra. There is one shorter (1.96 Å) and one longer (1.98 Å) Li–O bond length. There are one shorter (2.10 Å) and one longer (2.23 Å) Li–F bond lengths. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form LiO3F tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, edges with three LiO3F tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO2F2 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–1.98 Å. The Li–F bond length is 1.92 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form LiO3F tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, edges with three LiO3F tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO2F2 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.01 Å. The Li–F bond length is 1.98 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to two O2- and two F1- atoms to form distorted LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids that share corners with two equivalent MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one MnO3F tetrahedra, and edges with two LiO3F tetrahedra. There is one shorter (1.94 Å) and one longer (1.96 Å) Li–O bond length. There are one shorter (2.16 Å) and one longer (2.42 Å) Li–F bond lengths. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one MnO3F tetrahedra, and edges with two LiO3F tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.09 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.27 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form LiO3F tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO2F2 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–1.99 Å. The Li–F bond length is 1.93 Å. In the eighth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form LiO3F tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO2F2 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–1.99 Å. The Li–F bond length is 1.99 Å. In the ninth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.36 Å. In the tenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO3F tetrahedra, corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one MnO3F tetrahedra, and edges with two LiO3F tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.11 Å. There are two inequivalent Mn2+ sites. In the first Mn2+ site, Mn2+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form MnO3F tetrahedra that share corners with ten LiO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO2F2 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.06 Å. The Mn–F bond length is 2.22 Å. In the second Mn2+ site, Mn2+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form MnO3F tetrahedra that share corners with ten LiO3F tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO2F2 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO2F2 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.08 Å. The Mn–F bond length is 2.20 Å. There are six inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OLi5Mn pentagonal pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–55°. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OLi5Mn octahedra. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OLi5Mn octahedra. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to six Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OLi5Mn pentagonal pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–55°. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to six Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom. There are two inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one Mn2+ atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on Li5MnO3F by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1293516

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗