Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1293389

Materials Data on Li8FeO6 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li8FeO6 crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are ten inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four LiO4 trigonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.04 Å. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form distorted LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with eight LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one FeO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. There are three shorter (1.98 Å) and one longer (2.22 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the third Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form distorted LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with eight LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one FeO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.24 Å. In the fourth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four LiO4 trigonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.05 Å. In the fifth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.10 Å. In the sixth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.09 Å. In the seventh Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four LiO4 trigonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.02 Å. In the eighth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form distorted LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with eight LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one FeO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.22 Å. In the ninth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form distorted LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with eight LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one FeO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. There are three shorter (1.99 Å) and one longer (2.19 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the tenth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four LiO4 trigonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There is one shorter (1.96 Å) and three longer (2.02 Å) Li–O bond length. There are two inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to four O atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve LiO4 tetrahedra and edges with three LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There is three shorter (1.83 Å) and one longer (1.92 Å) Fe–O bond length. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to four O atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve LiO4 tetrahedra and edges with three LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There is three shorter (1.84 Å) and one longer (1.93 Å) Fe–O bond length. There are eight inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded to four Li and one Fe atom to form corner-sharing OLi4Fe trigonal bipyramids. In the second O site, O is bonded to four Li and one Fe atom to form corner-sharing OLi4Fe trigonal bipyramids. In the third O site, O is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Li atoms. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to six Li and one Fe atom. In the fifth O site, O is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to six Li and one Fe atom. In the sixth O site, O is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Li atoms. In the seventh O site, O is bonded to four Li and one Fe atom to form corner-sharing OLi4Fe trigonal bipyramids. In the eighth O site, O is bonded to four Li and one Fe atom to form corner-sharing OLi4Fe trigonal bipyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-30. Materials Data on Li8FeO6 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1293389

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗