Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1292449

Materials Data on Li2Fe3CoO8 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2Fe3CoO8 is Spinel-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic P2_1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three CoO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.03 Å. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three CoO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.02 Å. In the third Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three CoO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.03 Å. In the fourth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three CoO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.02 Å. There are six inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent CoO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.04 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CoO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.04 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CoO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.05 Å. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent CoO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.04 Å. In the fifth Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CoO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.05 Å. In the sixth Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CoO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.05 Å. There are two inequivalent Co sites. In the first Co site, Co is bonded to six O atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra and edges with six FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–1.92 Å. In the second Co site, Co is bonded to six O atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra and edges with six FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–1.92 Å. There are sixteen inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the second O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the third O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiFe3 trigonal pyramids. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the fifth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the sixth O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiFe3 trigonal pyramids. In the seventh O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the eighth O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the ninth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the tenth O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the eleventh O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiFe3 trigonal pyramids. In the twelfth O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the thirteenth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the fourteenth O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiFe3 trigonal pyramids. In the fifteenth O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom. In the sixteenth O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Fe, and one Co atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-08-03. Materials Data on Li2Fe3CoO8 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1292449

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗