Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1283971

Materials Data on Fe7S12 by Materials Project

Abstract

Fe7S12 crystallizes in the monoclinic Pc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are fourteen inequivalent Fe+2.86+ sites. In the first Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four equivalent FeS6 octahedra and corners with five FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 62–65°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.12–2.32 Å. In the second Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four FeS6 octahedra and corners with six FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 62–66°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.11–2.36 Å. In the third Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four equivalent FeS6 octahedra and corners with six FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 62–65°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.13–2.30 Å. In the fourth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to six S+1.67- atoms to form corner-sharing FeS6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.22–2.26 Å. In the fifth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four FeS6 octahedra and corners with six FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 61–64°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.12–2.34 Å. In the sixth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to six S+1.67- atoms to form corner-sharing FeS6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.22–2.27 Å. In the seventh Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with two equivalent FeS6 octahedra and corners with seven FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 63–65°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.13–2.27 Å. In the eighth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with two equivalent FeS6 octahedra and corners with five FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 62–65°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.14–2.35 Å. In the ninth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four FeS6 octahedra and corners with six FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 61–64°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.12–2.34 Å. In the tenth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to six S+1.67- atoms to form corner-sharing FeS6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.22–2.26 Å. In the eleventh Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four S+1.67- atoms. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.12–2.28 Å. In the twelfth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with two equivalent FeS6 octahedra and corners with seven FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 64–65°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.12–2.39 Å. In the thirteenth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four equivalent FeS6 octahedra and corners with six FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 61–65°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.14–2.30 Å. In the fourteenth Fe+2.86+ site, Fe+2.86+ is bonded to five S+1.67- atoms to form FeS5 square pyramids that share corners with four FeS6 octahedra and corners with six FeS5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 62–66°. There are a spread of Fe–S bond distances ranging from 2.12–2.36 Å. There are twenty-four inequivalent S+1.67- sites. In the first S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ and one S+1.67- atom. The S–S bond length is 2.19 Å. In the second S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ and one S+1.67- atom. The S–S bond length is 2.18 Å. In the third S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the fourth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the fifth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the sixth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the seventh S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the eighth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the ninth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the tenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the eleventh S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the twelfth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the thirteenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the fourteenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the fifteenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the sixteenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the seventeenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the eighteenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the nineteenth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the twentieth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the twenty-first S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ and one S+1.67- atom. In the twenty-second S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Fe+2.86+ and one S+1.67- atom. In the twenty-third S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms. In the twenty-fourth S+1.67- site, S+1.67- is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Fe+2.86+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on Fe7S12 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1283971

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗