Engineering Papers⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1280497

Materials Data on Ce2In3Ru2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Ce2Ru2In3 crystallizes in the monoclinic Pm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are eight inequivalent Ce sites. In the first Ce site, Ce is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Ru and nine In atoms. There are two shorter (3.45 Å) and two longer (3.47 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.20–3.42 Å. In the second Ce site, Ce is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Ru and nine In atoms. There are two shorter (3.44 Å) and two longer (3.46 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.19–3.42 Å. In the third Ce site, Ce is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two Ru and seven In atoms. There are one shorter (2.36 Å) and one longer (2.40 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.39–3.72 Å. In the fourth Ce site, Ce is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two Ru and seven In atoms. There are one shorter (2.35 Å) and one longer (2.40 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.39–3.72 Å. In the fifth Ce site, Ce is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Ru and nine In atoms. There are two shorter (3.44 Å) and two longer (3.46 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.19–3.41 Å. In the sixth Ce site, Ce is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to four Ru and nine In atoms. There are two shorter (3.44 Å) and two longer (3.46 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.19–3.41 Å. In the seventh Ce site, Ce is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two Ru and seven In atoms. There are one shorter (2.36 Å) and one longer (2.40 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.39–3.73 Å. In the eighth Ce site, Ce is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two Ru and seven In atoms. There are one shorter (2.37 Å) and one longer (2.40 Å) Ce–Ru bond lengths. There are a spread of Ce–In bond distances ranging from 3.39–3.74 Å. There are eight inequivalent Ru sites. In the first Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and four In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.91 Å. In the second Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and six In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.87 Å. In the third Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and four In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.91 Å. In the fourth Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and six In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.88 Å. In the fifth Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and four In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.91 Å. In the sixth Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and six In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.87 Å. In the seventh Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and six In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.81–2.87 Å. In the eighth Ru site, Ru is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Ce and four In atoms. There are a spread of Ru–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.91 Å. There are twelve inequivalent In sites. In the first In site, In is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to five Ce, three Ru, and four In atoms. There are a spread of In–In bond distances ranging from 2.97–3.26 Å. In the second In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Ce, three Ru, and three In atoms. There are one shorter (2.96 Å) and two longer (3.24 Å) In–In bond lengths. In the third In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Ce, three Ru, and three In atoms. There are one shorter (2.95 Å) and two longer (3.24 Å) In–In bond lengths. In the fourth In site, In is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five Ce, four Ru, and three In atoms. Both In–In bond lengths are 3.26 Å. In the fifth In site, In is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to five Ce, three Ru, and four In atoms. There are one shorter (2.96 Å) and one longer (3.09 Å) In–In bond lengths. In the sixth In site, In is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five Ce, four Ru, and three In atoms. There are one shorter (3.10 Å) and two longer (3.25 Å) In–In bond lengths. In the seventh In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Ce, three Ru, and three In atoms. In the eighth In site, In is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five Ce, four Ru, and three In atoms. There are one shorter (3.10 Å) and two longer (3.26 Å) In–In bond lengths. In the ninth In site, In is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to five Ce, three Ru, and four In atoms. In the tenth In site, In is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five Ce, four Ru, and three In atoms. In the eleventh In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Ce, three Ru, and three In atoms. In the twelfth In site, In is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to five Ce, three Ru, and four In atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-23. Materials Data on Ce2In3Ru2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1280497

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗