NASA NTRS · 20240011480
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Valerie Ryder. 2024-09-29. Spaceflight Toxicology. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240011480
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Historically, only 75 women have flown in space and while this inequity has been recently addressed with astronaut candidates about 50% female, research defining female biological responses to spaceflight remain limited. The NASA Artemis Campaign aims to land the first woman on the Moon for purposes of scientific discovery, technology advancement, and learning how to live and work on another world in preparation for human missions to Mars. The need to understand how sex and gender affect a wide range of physiological functions, impacting numerous health outcomes is critical. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize recent findings in women’s health in spaceflight, past studies examining female mammalian responses to spaceflight and highlight the need for additional studies to help reduce risk and enhance countermeasure development specific to female astronauts. The promise of artificial intelligence approaches for advancing the pace of research is discussed with the caveat that, at present, fundamental research on women’s health in space and sex-specificity of response to spaceflight stressors is not sufficiently robust to achieve this goal.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As interest in long duration effects of space habitation increases, understanding the behavior of model organisms living within the habitats engineered to fly them is vital for designing, validating, and interpreting future spaceflight studies. We previously conducted a detailed phenotypic analysis of mouse behavior during long duration (33-day) spaceflight in the NASA Rodent Habitat (Rodent Research-1; RR1 mission). Notably, we documented the emergence within the 8-10 days of launch of spontaneous ambulatory behavior in the form of circling or ‘race-tracking’ behavior in spaceflight but not in an identical ground control condition. Circling is unique to the NASA RH not having been reported to occur in other mouse habitats that provide limited opportunity for grasping, and/or are characterized by smaller habitable volumes viz., Italian Mice Drawer System (MDS) flown on ISS; Russian Block Obespecheniya Soderzhaniya (BOS) flown on Bion M-1, or JAXA Habitat Cage Unit (HCU) flown in the ISS Kibo module. Over time, circling became the primary dark cycle activity of FLT mice, occurring in individuals then as a coordinated group activity. Here we discuss possible interpretations of circling behavior including: (1) Stereotypic or abnormal repetitive behaviors (ARBs) that are unvarying, and apparently functionless behavior patterns documented numerous species in laboratory and zoo settings, possibility related to insufficient environmental enrichment and stress, (2) Rewarding effects of physical activity that are well-documented in terrestrial studies of rodents given the opportunity to run in wheels, and (3) Vestibular self-stimulation, i.e., the generation biologically-relevant amounts of vestibular sensory input to reduce the effects of microgravity. Affording mice the opportunity to grab and run in the RH resembles physical activities that the crew participate in routinely. Our approach is yielding an interesting analogue for better understanding human responses to spaceflight, and providing the opportunity to begin to address how physical movement influences responses to microgravity.