NASA NTRS · 20240009292
An overview of entry modeling approaches for asteroid impact scenarios.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Eric Stern, Bruno Dias, Chris Johnston, Brody Bessire, Amal Sahai. Entry Modeling for Planetary Defense. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240009292
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Next decade, the Dragonfly probe will enter Titan’s atmosphere on a mission to explore and characterize its unique and complex organic chemistry. In contrast to Mars entry missions, where the challenge is to slow down in its tenuous atmosphere before impacting the surface, Titan’s thick atmosphere provides generous drag. However, Titan has its own unique EDL challenges. Among these challenges is the long time (on the order of 90 minutes!) the vehicle will need to descend unguided through flow regimes where blunt-body entry probes are known to be dynamically unstable. This elongated timeline, both prior to drogue parachute deployment, and during the ensuing descent, has the potential to allow adverse dynamic instability properties to produce large amplitude oscillations in angle-of-attack. This, in-turn may lead to non-compliance in vehicle attitude requirements for EDL events such as parachute deployment, and lander release, or in the most extreme case, tumbling of the aeroshell and near-assured loss of mission.
Next decade, the Dragonfly probe will enter Titan’s atmosphere on a mission to explore and characterize its unique and complex organic chemistry. In contrast to Mars entry missions, where the challenge is to slow down in its tenuous atmosphere before impacting the surface, Titan’s thick atmosphere provides generous drag. However, Titan has its own unique EDL challenges. Among these challenges is the long time (on the order of 90 minutes!) the vehicle will need to descend unguided through flow regimes where blunt-body entry probes are known to be dynamically unstable. This elongated timeline, both prior to drogue parachute deployment, and during the ensuing descent, has the potential to allow adverse dynamic instability properties to produce large amplitude oscillations in angle-of-attack. This, in-turn may lead to non-compliance in vehicle attitude requirements for EDL events such as parachute deployment, and lander release, or in the most extreme case, tumbling of the aeroshell and near-assured loss of mission.
Overview of sensors used in EDL instrumentation suites. For spaceflight missions involving atmospheric entry, the environment experienced by a spacecraft cannot be fully replicated on the ground. Taking measurements in the flight environment is the “gold standard” for: Validating predictive modeling tools Reducing risk on future EDL missions EDL Instrumentation can consist of in-situ sensors embedded within the aeroshell, or remote observations. Focus of this presentation is on NASA in-situ sensors.