Engineering Papers⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20220009610

AdaStress

Abstract

This is a tutorial on AdaStress, a tool for finding and analyzing the likeliest failures in a simulated system under test. The presentation outlines the adaptive stress testing framework, provides a demonstration of use, and showcases several examples of failure detection in a complex real-world system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adrian Agogino, Rory Lipkis. AdaStress. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220009610

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Reinforcement Learning for Anomaly Detection in Nuclear Power Plant Operation and Maintenance

In nuclear power plants (NPPs), timely identification of sensor and human errors is critical to ensure safe and efficient plant operations. Anomaly detection models can be employed for this task. However, traditional anomaly detection approaches may have high dependency on labeled datasets and struggle with adaptability in complex, dynamic environments. Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated significant potential in fault diagnosis and anomaly detection; however, its application to anomaly detection in NPPs remains a relatively underexplored research direction. Hence, to address this gap, in this study, we present a novel physics-informed reinforcement learning model, PIRL-AD: Physics-Informed Reinforcement Learning for Anomaly Detection, that integrates domain knowledge from calorimetric equations into the RL framework for enhanced sensor and human error anomaly detection. We evaluate the performance of PIRL-AD against a non-physics informed RL benchmark and a support vector machine (SVM) on data collected from a forced flow loop testbed. Experimental results suggest that PIRL-AD outperforms other baselines on a range of anomalous datasets that include both sensor and human-induced anomalies across key performance metrics, statistically outperforming the RL and SVM benchmarks with respect to geometric mean (respectively, 92.96% vs. 91.06% vs. 83.01%) and F1-score (respectively, 89.23% vs. 86.98% vs. 77.01%). Furthermore, the findings suggest the potential of physics-integrated reinforcement learning models for enhanced anomaly detection performance in NPPs.

Reinforcement learning↗