Upgrading the 14x22 Data Acquisition System (DAS)

Ashley Dittberner

NASA NTRS · 20220006895

Upgrading the 14x22 Data Acquisition System (DAS)

Abstract

The 14-by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel recently completed development and installation of a new Data Acquisition System for use in the tunnel and in the Rotor Test Cell (RTC). Planning and development of this new system has been ongoing for several years, and installation was performed over this past year. This effort also required an upgrade of the facility infrastructure to support the upgraded power and cooling requirements. This presentation summarizes the new data acquisition system, improved capabilities, challenges of installation, and proposed future enhancements to the system.

Explore related subjects

wind tunnel data acquisition system

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ashley Dittberner. Upgrading the 14x22 Data Acquisition System (DAS). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220006895

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2026

Experimental Demonstration of a Supersonic Spike Ejector

Spike diffusers are presented as a means to improve supersonic ejector efficiency via reduction in shock losses. Design, fabrication, and testing of an articulated prototype is described. Experimental results are compared to empirical performance curves representing the loci of optimal one- and two-stage conventional ejectors driven by dry air and discharging to atmosphere. Operated at a compression ratio of ~10 with all inputs equal, the spike ejector is shown to have achieved up to 2.19X and 1.83X the secondary mass throughput of the one- and two-stage references, respectively. This suggests the potential of spike diffusers to reduce ejector operating costs by ~50%.

wind tunnel↗

NASA NTRS2022

Optimization Approach for Wind Tunnel Fan Blade Strain Gage Correlation with Test Fixture Unknowns

NASA has a significant maintenance challenge with the aging wind tunnel infrastructure across the Agency. Some wind tunnel fan blades, such as those in the National Transonic Facility at NASA Langley Research Center, have been in use for far longer than their planned 10-year lifetime. No detailed analytical models of the fan blades from their initial fabrication were created. To support the fabrication of either new, nominally identical fan blades or newly designed fan blades, accurate analytical models of the existing fan blades are necessary to demonstrate an understanding of the capabilities of the existing fan blades. Additionally, the existing documentation of the testing of the existing fan blades has gaps. In this report, a process for improving test-analysis correlation for these wind tunnel fan blades is discussed. This process involved a detailed study of unknown parameters in test fixture parameters from the old and incomplete test documentation. To improve correlation, these unknown parameters were used as design variables in an optimization study to minimize the error between test data and computed structural responses. Legacy strain gage data from tests conducted in 1981 were compared with results from a finite element model created in 2019. The use of test data from 1981 was necessary because none of the existing fan blades could be spared for use in destructive structural testing. While this process was demonstrated for wind tunnel fan blades, this process could be utilized for evaluating unknowns in test fixtures for other structural test configurations.

wind tunnel↗

NASA NTRS2022

Flow Visualization to Complement Modern Wing Tunnel Testing

In recent times, wind tunnel testing at the NASA Ames Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT) seeks to validate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools. To that end, we find that now more than ever, flow visualization is a powerful capability that provides context to the experimental results bringing real-time insight to the researcher. It enables us to answer questions like: “Why does this drag polar look different?” or “What is the source of this tone in the microphone data?”. Flow visualization can verify that assumptions made in the CFD model are correct, addressing questions like: “Are our trip dots the correct size and location?” or “Does the position of this shock match our prediction?”. Techniques such as infrared flow visualization and schlieren / shadowgraph are powerful capabilities that when taken together can provide results as to the nature of the fluid structure interaction at a test condition in a format that pairs well with computational results. When properly integrated these measurements can be taken with no impact on the productivity of the test program, supplementing traditional measurements and often discovering something unforeseen, helping the researcher to answer those slippery aerodynamic questions and ultimately build confidence in the accuracy of a model.

wind tunnel↗