NASA NTRS · 20210019385
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Matthew Orrell, Chris Wohl, Robert Edahl. Bending Stiffness in Prepreg Composites. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210019385
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
With the ever-expanding aviation industry, a need is arising for more rapid production of composite aircraft to meet increasing demand. State-of-the-art aircraft such as the Boeing 787showcase 50% composite material usage by weight, highlighting this emerging industry-wide adoption of the material system. Currently, many of the large structures associated with these aircraft are manufactured additively via Automated Fiber Placement (AFP). The AFP process shows great potential for efficient manufacturing, however unavoidable defects still occur because of tool surface geometry, placement errors, or poor process planning, resulting in decreased quality and throughput. Due to such effects, it is critical to incorporate design for manufacturing (DFM) principles to achieve the optimal manufacturing plan and resulting structure. This work will develop a methodology for incorporating design information into process planning metrics in an automated fashion to achieve an optimal set of process inputs.The analysis incorporates HyperX, Computer Aided Process Planning (CAPP) and Vericut Composite Programming (VCP). Safety margins from HyperX are imported into CAPP where AFP defects are mapped to the values. The resulting margins are then incorporated into the CAPP manufacturability algorithms, creating a design informed process planning analysis
Commercial aircraft structures are frequently manufactured from carbon-epoxy materials because of their weight and stiffness advantages compared to metallic materials. Wing cover panels are regularly manufactured using an automated fiber placement (AFP) process, but current design and manufacturing methodologies do not fully take advantage of the opportunities afforded by AFP. Design and manufacturing studies were undertaken at the NASA Langley Research Center at the Integrated Structural Assembly of Advanced Composites (ISAAC) facility to quantify manufacturing benefits and limitations associated with AFP to create structurally efficient integral stiffeners as an alternative to bonded or mechanically fastened stiffeners. This methodology could save weight and remove failure mechanisms by reducing the need for rivets and bonding materials since the stiffener plies are interleaved within the skin plies. The use of AFP with integral stiffeners can open the design space, but a fundamental, systematic evaluation of manufacturing limitations is necessary. Manufacturing trials are described herein, where considered manufacturing variables included stiffener location, stiffener course staggering, stiffener widths, stiffener intersections, and material thicknesses for both the skin and stiffener plies. The manufacturing process and lessons learned from each trial are described, including the most successful current design which contains staggered stiffeners, non-traditional laminate angles, and a combination of multiple material thicknesses within the same laminate.