USM3D Simulations for Third Sonic Boom Workshop

Alaa Elmiligui; Mohagna J. Pandya; Melissa B. Carter; Boris Diskin; Sudheer N. Nayani

NASA NTRS · 20205002836

USM3D Simulations for Third Sonic Boom Workshop

Alaa Elmiligui·Mohagna J. Pandya·Melissa B. Carter·Boris Diskin·Sudheer N. Nayani

Abstract

The NASA USM3D flow solver was used to compute test cases for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop (SBPW3). The test cases include an axisymmetric equivalent area body, a near field biconvex shock-plume interaction wind tunnel model, and the C608 Low Boom Flight Demonstrator. Numerical simulations were conducted on the mixed element grids and the tetrahedral grids provided by the workshop committee, as well as a family of grids generated by an in-house approach for sonic boom analyses known as Boom Grid. The near-field pressure signatures were extracted, propagated to the ground and the perceived loudness levels on the ground was computed. The USM3D near-field pressure signatures,corresponding ground signatures, and loudness levels on the ground are compared with mean values from other workshop participants.

Explore related subjects

Supersonics Boom CFD Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Alaa Elmiligui, Mohagna J. Pandya, Melissa B. Carter, Boris Diskin, Sudheer N. Nayani. USM3D Simulations for Third Sonic Boom Workshop. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205002836

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2023

Acoustics of a Supersonic Mach 1.4 Axisymmetric Spike Inlet

An engine inlet for a supersonic commercial aircraft is analyzed for noise radiation in low-speed configurations for which auxiliary inlet doors are open. Duct modes generated by the fan are estimated by post-processing unsteady Reynold averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) simulations of the fan and are used as boundary conditions to the inlet domain. Far-field inlet radiated tone levels are computed using commercial acoustics finite element software. The results indicated that the inlet tone levels at cutback and sideline conditions are higher by more than 20 dB than the approach levels.

Supersonics↗

NASA NTRS2023

Acoustics of a Supersonic Mach 1.4 Axisymmetric Spike Inlet

An inlet for a supersonic commercial aircraft is analyzed for noise radiation in low-speed configuration, with auxiliary inlet open. Duct mode amplitudes generated by the fan are determined by post-processing a URANS simulation and become a boundary condition to the inlet. Far-field sound is modeled using commercial acoustics finite element software. The effect of inlet geometry and acoustic liners is simulated and discussed. Absolute levels for inlet tone noise are predicted.

Supersonics↗

NASA NTRS2022

USM3D Simulations for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop

The NASA USM3D flow solver was used to compute test cases for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop (SBPW3). The test cases included a nearfield biconvex shock-plume interaction wind tunnel model and the C608 Low Boom Flight Demonstrator. Numerical simulations were conducted on the mixed-element and tetrahedral grids provided by the workshop committee, as well as a family of grids generated by an in-house approach known as BoomGrid. The nearfield pressure signatures were extracted and propagated to the ground, and the perceived loudness levels on the ground were computed. The USM3D nearfield pressure signatures, corresponding ground signatures, and loudness levels on the ground were compared with that of mean values from other workshop participants. The effect of three flux-limiters on the accuracy of nearfield pressure signature prediction was investigated and results were compared with that of mean values from other workshop participants. The effect of using wall-function models for predicting nearfield pressure signatures was also evaluated. Results showed that the overpressure signatures extracted from the wall-modeled simulations and the wall-resolved simulations are in good agreement. The use of wall functions (wall-modeled simulations) allowed for approximately 23% savings in the time to solution and yielded comparable perceived loudness levels on the ground to the wall-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes simulations.

Supersonics↗