Engineering PapersSearch

NASA NTRS · 20110016005

Construction and Resource Utilization Explorer: Regolith Characterization Using a Modular Instrument Suite and Analysis Tools

Abstract

The Construction Resource Utilization Explorer (CRUX) is a technology maturation project for the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration to provide enabling technology for lunar and planetary surface operations (LPSO). The CRUX will have 10 instruments, a data handling function (Mapper - with features of data subscription, fusion, interpretation, and publication through geographical information system [GIs] displays), and a decision support system DSS) to provide information needed to plan and conduct LPSO. Six CRUX instruments are associated with an instrumented drill to directly measure regolith properties (thermal, electrical, mechanical, and textural) and to determine the presence of water and other hydrogen sources to a depth of about 2 m (Prospector). CRUX surface and geophysical instruments (Surveyor) are designed to determine the presence of hydrogen, delineate near subsurface properties, stratigraphy, and buried objects over a broad area through the use of neutron and seismic probes, and ground penetrating radar. Techniques to receive data from existing space qualified stereo pair cameras to determine surface topography will also be part of the CRUX. The Mapper will ingest information from CRUX instruments and other lunar and planetary data sources, and provide data handling and display features for DSS output. CRUX operation will be semi-autonomous and near real-time to allow its use for either planning or operations purposes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johnson, Jerome B., Boynton, William V., Davis, Keil, Elphic, Richard, Glass, Brian, Haldemann, Albert F. C., Adams, Frederick W.. 2005-09-23. Construction and Resource Utilization Explorer: Regolith Characterization Using a Modular Instrument Suite and Analysis Tools. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20110016005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Implementation Plan for a NASA Integrated Lunar Science Strategy in the Artemis Era

This Implementation Plan provides a snapshot of NASA’s plans to implement the strategy recommended in OWL and to address the M2M objectives relevant to lunar science. The word “integrated” in the title refers to integrating the capabilities and new opportunities afforded by Artemis and CLPS alongside more traditional mechanisms such as The Discovery and New Frontiers Programs and various Research and Analysis (R&A) elements to achieve our lunar science objectives. It is an opportunity to present the full scope of tools currently available to NASA and how they map to high-priority lunar science that can be accomplished on and at the Moon. It is also an opportunity to build a plan for future NASA-led, lunar focused science and exploration activities that is flexible and can be adapted to a changing landscape (i.e., capability growth, priority evolution, and budgetary fluctuation).

Moon

Lunar Vehicle Active Charge Control System (LVACCS)+

The Lunar Vehicle Active Charge Control System (LVACCS) is an instrument in development that will measure the electrical potential of a spacecraft or rover under both positive and negative charge conditions, actively discharge negative charge, and charge the vehicle to a safe positive potential. All surfaces immersed in a plasma charge to non-zero potentials. In very low-density plasma (< 100 cm^-3), space vehicle charging can interfere with plasma probe measurements, degrade avionics performance, or cause a total system failure. LVACCS provides real-time in-situ space situational awareness that overcome these challenges in a small package. LVACCS has been awarded a NASA PICASSO grant to bring the instrument to technology readiness level 5. LVACCS consists of two main components: a collimated photoelectron gun (CPEG) and a Spacecraft Charge Detector (SCD).Monitoring charge build up on the lunar surface isa critical first step to understand hazards for crew, rovers, and instrumentation operating there.The LVACCS instrument will be able to fill in this gap providing robust lunar surface potential measurements and active charge dissipation.

Moon

Revisiting the petrogenesis of pyroclastic glass bead deposits at the Apollo 15 and 17 sites

The Apollo 15 low-titanium and Apollo 17 high-titanium pyroclastic glass beads are amongst the most primitive magmatically derived samples obtained from the Moon. Two key samples, the low-Ti Apollo 15426 green glass clod and the high-Ti Apollo 74220 orange glass are morphologically distinct, where the Apollo 15 beads are larger (~ 107 μm along maximum axis) and more fractured, and the Apollo 17 are smaller (~42 μm) and less fractured. In this study, holohyaline beads as well as crystallized beads were examined from both samples. Crystallized beads show compositional variability in major, minor, and trace elements and enable examination of magmatic mineral fractionation processes during cooling of both deposits. The Apollo 15426 beads experienced variable olivine crystallization, whereas the Apollo 74220 beads experienced both olivine and ilmenite crystallization. Holohyaline beads from both deposits show more limited major, minor, and trace element variability than their crystallized counterparts. Trace element abundance data for individual holohyaline beads show that in Apollo 74220, they are tightly clustered at ~30 × Carbonaceous Ivuna chondrite [CI] with negative Eu anomalies and subchondritic Nb/Ta, and interpreted to reflect the presence of late-stage magma ocean cumulate overturned into an otherwise primitive mantle source. Incompatible trace element abundances for holohyaline beads in 15426 are supra-chondritic from ~8 × CI, to >80 × CI, with pronounced relative depletions in Sr and Eu for the most incompatible element enriched beads, which represent a distinct bead group within the deposit. Apollo 15426 beads have elevated Ni and Co abundances at the edges of the beads compared to their centers. These data are interpreted to reflect a more complex magmatic evolution of the 15426 deposit, beginning with: (i) initial magma generation, storage and assimilation within shallower low-Ca and high-Ca pyroxene bearing magma ocean cumulates (15B,C); (ii) mobilization of the earlier magmas by more recently generated primitive magmas (15A); (iii) eruption and crystallization of some beads (15D,E), and (iv) later jumbling of the deposit, possible impact contamination and addition of exotic bead components (J Group). In contrast, the 74220 data shows no discernable difference between Ni and Co abundances at the edges and centers supporting prior observations for limited melt fractionation and an absence of meteoritic components. It is further suggested that both deposits are likely to have been formed in the presence of a transient atmosphere. Using 74220 melt compositions from this study, post-entrapment crystallization abundances range from 266 to 1130 micrograms/g for H 2 O, 36 to 68 micrograms/g for F, 441 to 832 micrograms/g for S, and zero to 2.31 micrograms/g for Cl, consistent with prior studies and suggesting up to ~0.1 wt.% H 2 O in the melt, with considerably less in the source. The role that late-stage magma ocean cumulates rich in ilmenite, apatite and high-Ca pyroxene might play in modifying this volatile element estimate, however, casts remaining doubt on the volatile element abundance and evolution of the primitive Moon.

Moon