A Comparison of Satellite-Based Multilayered Cloud Detection Methods

Abstract

Both techniques show skill in detecting multilayered clouds, but they disagree more than 50% of the time. BTD method tends to detect more ML clouds than CO2 method and has slightly higher detection accuracy. CO2 method might be better for minimizing false positives, but further study is needed. Neither method as been optimized for GOES data. BTD technique developed on AVHRR, better BTD signals & resolution. CO2 developed on MODIS, better resolution & 4 CO2 channels. Many additional comparisons with ARSCL data will be used to optimize both techniques. A combined technique will be examined using MODIS & Meteosat-8 data. After optimization, the techniques will be implemented in the ARM operational satellite cloud processing.