Technical facilities catalog, volume II

Ralph E Cushman

Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 19670029756

Technical facilities catalog, volume II

Ralph E Cushman

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This Technical Facilities Catalog has been developed in response to an increasing demand for general and specific information on NASA technical facilities. The Catalog is intended to: a)provide NASA management, facilities managers, program and project managers, individual research engineers and scientists, and other agencies of the Government with knowledge of existing NASA research, development, test and evaluation facilities and b)provide the reader with a basic concept of the capabilities and functions of the wide variety of NASA technical facilities and the technological areas they support.

Explore related subjects

Wind tunnel Research facility Test facility Environmental chamber Aerospace technology

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ralph E Cushman. 1967-03-01. Technical facilities catalog, volume II. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19670029756

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2014

Increased Mach Number Capability for the NASA Glenn 10x10 Supersonic Wind Tunnel

Computational simulations and wind tunnel testing were conducted to explore the operation of the Abe Silverstein Supersonic Wind Tunnel at the NASA Glenn Research Center at test section Mach numbers above the current limit of Mach 3.5. An increased Mach number would enhance the capability for testing of supersonic and hypersonic propulsion systems. The focus of the explorations was on understanding the flow within the second throat of the tunnel, which is downstream of the test section and is where the supersonic flow decelerates to subsonic flow. Methods of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were applied to provide details of the shock boundary layer structure and to estimate losses in total pressure. The CFD simulations indicated that the tunnel could be operated up to Mach 4.0 if the minimum width of the second throat was made smaller than that used for previous operation of the tunnel. Wind tunnel testing was able to confirm such operation of the tunnel at Mach 3.6 and 3.7 before a hydraulic failure caused a stop to the testing. CFD simulations performed after the wind tunnel testing showed good agreement with test data consisting of static pressures along the ceiling of the second throat. The CFD analyses showed increased shockwave boundary layer interactions, which was also observed as increased unsteadiness of dynamic pressures collected in the wind tunnel testing.

Wind tunnel↗

NASA NTRS1962

Tables of Interference Factors for Use in Wind-tunnel and Ground-effect Calculations for VTOL-STOL Aircraft. Part IV- Wind Tunnels Having Width-height Ratio of 0.5

Tables of interference factors for use in wind-tunnel and ground-effect calculations for VTOL-STOL aircraft are presented for wind tunnels having a width-height ratio of 0.5. These tables were machine-calculated and are intended for use with the procedures of NASA Technical Report R-124. These tables are presented without comment.

Wind tunnel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Acoustic Improvements to the 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel

A major refurbishment of the 9- by 15-Foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel at NASA Glenn Research Center was undertaken between 2016 and 2019 to improve the acoustic measurement capability of the facility. The principal objective was to lower the background noise in the test section so quiet aircraft propulsors could be tested with good signal-to-noise ratio. The secondary objective was to improve the anechoic quality of the facility so that the measurement uncertainty would be reduced and the data collected would be more accurate. The results of the project were a vastly improved anechoic wind tunnel, with one-third octave sound levels reduced by 8 to 18 dB in the frequency range of interest. The anechoic quality of the test section was improved substantially, reducing the effect of unwanted echoes contaminating the noise measurements, with the error in an impulse response measurement reduced from 0.8 dB to 0.2 dB. This report describes the main acoustic findings and is intended to provide guidance for other facilities requiring a low noise environment

Wind tunnel↗