Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Zhang, Ji-Guang

Publications and source records attributed to Zhang, Ji-Guang.

At least 19 records

Method to control the etching rate of materials

A method for etching materials in which organic solvents are added to the etching mixture and combined in a mixing arrangement. When agitated organic materials mix with the etching agent and interact with the underlying material to form a shield around the etched areas that prevents the additional interaction of water with the newly etched areas and enables the etching of silicon oxides (SiOx) but does not oxidize Si. This method leads to milder reactions with less heat generation and avoids the safety hazards associated with conventional etching methods.

Yi, Ran↗

Extending Calendar Life of Si-Based Lithium-Ion Batteries by a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte

Silicon (Si) is one of the most promising anode materials for the next generation lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Although significant progresses have been made on the cycle life of Si-based LIBs, their calendar-life is still far less than those required for electrical vehicle applications. Here, in this work, the fundamental mechanisms behind the limited calendar life of Si-LIBs have been investigated. It is found that the unstable interphase layers formed on electrodes during the formation/cycling of batteries using conventional electrolyte with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) additive are responsible for the rapid impedance-increase of Si-LIBs during storage at elevated temperature (55°C). By using an FEC-free localized high concentration electrolyte (lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide:ethyl propionate:ethylene carbonate:1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (1:2.8:0.2:1 by mol.) with 1 wt.% lithium difluorophosphate), stable interphase layers formed on electrodes can effectively block the crosstalk between cathode and anode, minimize the impedance increase of Si||LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 (NMC622) batteries during storage at elevated temperature (55°C), therefore largely improve their calendar life. Si||NMC622 batteries using this electrolyte also demonstrated a high-capacity retention of ~92.4% after 500 cycles at 45°C with well-preserved electrode structure. Hence, this novel electrolyte is a good candidate to extend the cycling life and calendar life of Si-LIBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Tailoring Solvation Solvent in Localized High-Concentration Electrolytes for Lithium||Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile

Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) is a promising cathode material for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries due to its significantly reduced polysulfide (PS) dissolution compared to the elemental S cathode. Although conventional carbonate-based electrolytes is stable with SPAN electrodes, it is less stable with Li metal anode (LMA). Recently, localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have been developed to improve the stability of LMA. Here, we report a new strategy to further improve the performance of LI||SPAN batteries by replacing the conventional solvating solvent 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) in the LHCE with a new solvating solvent, 1,2-diethoxyethane (DEE), the new LHCEs exhibits less reactivity against Li 2 S 2 , alleviates PS dissolution, forms a better cathode-electrolyte interphase layer on the SPAN, and enhances structure reversibility even at elevated temperature (ET, 45°C). With the same salt and diluent as in other LHCEs, the LHCE with DEE leads to better performance in Li||SPAN batteries (with 82.9% capacity retention after 300 cycles at ET), preservation of SPAN cathode structure, and suppression of the volume change of LMA. The similar strategy on tailoring the solvating solvents in LHCEs can also be used in other rechargeable batteries to improve their performances.

1,2-diethoxyethane↗

Three-Dimensional Polymeric-Scaffold-Based Current Collector for a Lithium Metal Anode toward High-Energy-Density Batteries

Here, the practical applications of high-energy-density rechargeable lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) have been impeded by the intrinsic issues of the Li metal anode (LMA) including high reactivity with electrolyte and dendritic formation. Conventional LMAs, which have the "hostless" feature consisting of a Li layer on a two-dimensional copper (Cu) foil as a current collector, led to additional loss in specific energy density, since Cu is a nonfaradaic heavy metal, bringing formidable areal capacity loss. To address these problems, a heat-treated three-dimensional-structured Cu-coated polyimide (HT-Cu@PI) membrane is designed and fabricated as a current collector. Benefiting from this unique material/structure, it enables not only better electrochemically deposited Li by a uniform/continuous Li-ion transport pathway but also a significant increase in the gravimetric/volumetric energy densities of LMBs by allowing more Li deposition in a fixed weight/volume. Therefore, this new LMA structure will accelerate the practical application of high-energy-density LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Improving Cycling Performance of Anode-Free Lithium Batteries by Pressure and Voltage Control

The anode-free lithium (Li) batteries (AFLBs) have great potential to provide higher energy density than most other batteries. However, the performance of AFLBs is very sensitive to pressure and other operating parameters, especially for coin cells widely used in AFLB investigations. Therefore, optimizing cell assembly parameters and test protocol is critical to get reliable and comparable results in this field. In this work, the operating voltage range of AFLBs using a localized high concentration electrolyte has been optimized. The morphology of the deposited Li in AFLBs is much more indicting to the pressure than other type of batteries due to the absence of anode active material (i.e. Li) as a pressure cushion layer in the as prepared cells. With an optimized cycling protocol, a thin layer of uniform nucleation sites can be formed in the initial cycle which will facilitate smooth Li desposition/stripping in the subsequent cycles of AFLBs. The solid electrolyte interphase layer formed under optimized pressure and uniform pressure distribution exhibits a good mechanical stability even after long-term cycling. In conclusion, with an optimized cell configuration, the internal pressure in the coin cells has been optimized to improve the cycling performance of AFLBs (Cu||NMC811) with 72% of capacity retention in 100 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Localized high-concentration electrolytes get more localized through micelle-like structures

Liquid electrolytes in batteries are typically treated as macroscopically homogeneous ionic transport media despite having a complex chemical composition and atomistic solvation structures, leaving a knowledge gap of the microstructural characteristics. Here, we reveal a unique micelle-like structure in a localized high-concentration electrolyte, in which the solvent acts as a surfactant between an insoluble salt in a diluent. The miscibility of the solvent with the diluent and simultaneous solubility of the salt results in a micelle-like structure with a smeared interface and an increased salt concentration at the centre of the salt–solvent clusters that extends the salt solubility. These intermingling miscibility effects have temperature dependencies, wherein a typical localized high-concentration electrolyte peaks in localized cluster salt concentration near room temperature and is used to form a stable solid–electrolyte interphase on a Li metal anode. Importantly, these findings serve as a guide to predicting a stable ternary phase diagram and connecting the electrolyte microstructure with electrolyte formulation and formation protocols of solid–electrolyte interphases for enhanced battery cyclability.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Direct in situ measurements of electrical properties of solid–electrolyte interphase on lithium metal anodes

The solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) critically governs the performance of rechargeable batteries. An ideal SEI is expected to be electrically insulative to prevent persistently parasitic reactions between the electrode and the electrolyte and ionically conductive to facilitate Faradaic reactions of the electrode. However, the true nature of the electrical properties of the SEI remains hitherto unclear due to the lack of a direct characterization method. Here we use in situ bias transmission electron microscopy to directly measure the electrical properties of SEIs formed on copper and lithium substrates. We reveal that SEIs show a voltage-dependent differential conductance. A higher rate of differential conductance induces a thicker SEI with an intricate topographic feature, leading to an inferior Coulombic efficiency and cycling stability in Li||Cu and Li||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells. Further, our work provides insight into the targeted design of the SEI with desired characteristics towards better battery performance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

In Situ Visualization of the Pinning Effect of Planar Defects on Li Ion Insertion

Longevity of Li ion batteries strongly depends on the interaction of transporting Li ions in electrode crystals with defects. However, detailed interactions between the Li ion flux and structural defects in the host crystal remain obscure due to the transient nature of such interactions. Here, by in situ transmission electron microscopy and density function theory calculations, we reveal how the diffusion pathways and transport kinetics of a Li ion can be affected by planar defects in a tungsten trioxide lattice. We uncover that changes in charge distribution and lattice spacing along the planar defects disrupt the continuity of ion conduction channels and dramatically increase the energy barrier of Li diffusion, thus, arresting Li ions at the defect sites and twisting the lithiation front. In conclusion, the atomic-scale understanding holds critical implications for rational interface design in solid-state batteries and solid oxide fuel cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries operating at extreme conditions

Electrolytes for lithium ion batteries with carbon-based, silicon-based, or carbon- and silicon-based anodes include a lithium salt; a nonaqueous solvent comprising at least one of the following components: (i) an ester, (ii) a sulfur-containing solvent, (iii) a phosphorus-containing solvent, (iv) an ether, (v) a nitrile, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt is soluble in the solvent; a diluent comprising a fluoroalkyl ether, a fluorinated orthoformate, a fluorinated carbonate, a fluorinated borate, a fluorinated phosphate, a fluorinated phosphite, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt has a solubility in the diluent at least 10 times less than a solubility of the lithium salt in the solvent; and an additive having a different composition than the lithium salt, a different composition than the solvent, and a different composition than the diluent. In some electrolytes, the nonaqueous solvent comprises an ester.

Cao, Xia↗

Electrolytes for lithium batteries with carbon and/or silicon anodes

Electrolytes for lithium ion batteries with carbon-based, silicon-based, or carbon- and silicon-based anodes include a lithium salt; a nonaqueous solvent comprising at least one of the following components: (i) an ester, (ii) a sulfur-containing solvent, (iii) a phosphorus-containing solvent, (iv) an ether, (v) a nitrile, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt is soluble in the solvent; a diluent comprising a fluoroalkyl ether, a fluorinated orthoformate, a fluorinated carbonate, a fluorinated borate, or a combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt has a solubility in the diluent at least 10 times less than a solubility of the lithium salt in the solvent; and an additive having a different composition than the lithium salt, a different composition than the solvent, and a different composition than the diluent.

Xu, Wu↗

Voltage and Temperature Limits of Advanced Electrolytes for Lithium-Metal Batteries

Several advanced electrolytes (mainly ether-based) have recently demonstrated excellent electrochemical performance in high energy density lithium (Li)-metal batteries. However, the safety of these ether-based electrolytes is still unknown. This work evaluates the thermal stability of these new formulations to understand their safety limits of operation in comparison to carbonate electrolytes typically used in Li-ion batteries. Electrolyte stability is assessed in conjunction with LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cathode and Li-metal anode at ultra-high voltages (≤ 4.8 V) and temperatures (≤ 300°C) to trigger thermal runaway, where onset and extent of heat release are monitored via isothermal microcalorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry Most ether-based electrolytes show improved thermal resilience over commercial carbonate formulations when heated up to 300°C. The thermal behavior in presence of charged cathode and Li-metal suggests that the new electrolytes may be better at stabilizing active material surfaces than carbonate electrolytes. Although extreme voltages severely destabilize the ether-based formulations, prompting thermal runaway, a phosphate based localized high concentration electrolyte exhibits superior stability over commercial carbonate electrolytes at all tested temperatures (32°C, 45°C, and 60°C). Although thermal analysis during the first charge process (as adopted in this preliminary study) may be insufficient to conclude the long-term advantages of these electrolytes, a more stable electrolyte identified under extreme voltage and temperature conditions will provide valuable guidance for the safety of future electrolyte designs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Pinned Electrode/Electrolyte Interphase and Its Formation Origin for Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Cathode in Stable Lithium Batteries

Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) represents one of the most promising directions for high-energy-density lithium (Li)-sulfur batteries. However, the practical application of Li||SPAN is currently limited by the insufficient chemical/electrochemical stability of electrode/electrolyte interphase (EEI). Here, a pinned EEI layer is designed for stabilizing a SPAN cathode by regulating the EEI formation mechanism in an advanced LiFSI/ether/fluorinated-ether electrolyte. Computational simulations and experimental investigations reveal that, benefiting from the nonsolvating nature, the fluorinated-ether can not only act as a protective shield to prevent the Li polysulfides dissolution but also, more importantly, endow a diffusion-controlled EEI formation process. It promotes the formation of a uniform, protective, and conductive EEI layer pinning into SPAN surface region, enabling the high loading Li||SPAN batteries with superior cycling stability, wide temperature performance, and high-rate capability. Finally, this design strategy opens an avenue for exploring advanced electrolytes for Li||SPAN batteries and guides the interface design for broad types of battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

BattPhase—A Convergent, Non-Oscillatory, Efficient Algorithm and Code for Predicting Shape Changes in Lithium Metal Batteries Using Phase-Field Models: Part I. Secondary Current Distribution

Electrochemical models at different scales and varying levels of complexity have been used in the literature to study the evolution of the anode surface in lithium metal batteries. This includes continuum, mesoscale (phase-field approaches), and multiscale models. Thermodynamics-based equations have been used to study phase changes in lithium batteries using phase-field approaches. However, grid convergence studies and the effect of additional parameters needed to simulate these models are not well-documented in the literature. In this paper, using a motivating example of a moving boundary model in one- and two-dimensions, we show how one can formulate phase-field models, implement algorithms for the same and analyze the results. An open-access code with no restrictions is provided as well. This article concludes with some thoughts on the computational efficiency of phase-field models for simulating dendritic growth.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Batteries (2021 Annual Progress Report)

This document summarizes the progress of VTO battery R&D projects supported during the fiscal year 2021 (FY 2021). In FY 2021, the DOE VTO battery R&D funding was approximately $\$$115 million. Its R&D focus was on the development of high-energy batteries for EVs as well as very high-power devices for hybrid vehicles. The electrochemical energy storage roadmap (which can be found at the EERE Roadmap web page2) describes ongoing and planned efforts to develop electrochemical storage technologies for EVs. To advance battery technology, which can in turn improve market penetration of PEVs, the program investigates various battery chemistries to overcome specific technical barriers, e.g., battery cost, performance, life (both the calendar life and the cycle life), its tolerance to abusive conditions, and its recyclability/sustainability. VTO R&D has had considerable success, lowering the cost of EV battery packs to $\$$185/kWh in 2019 (representing more than 80% reduction since 2008) yet even further cost reduction is necessary for EVs to achieve head-to-head cost competitiveness with ICEs (without Federal subsidies). In addition, today’s batteries also need improvements in such areas as their ability to accept charging at a high rate, referred to as extreme fast charging (XFC) (15 minute charge) – to provide a “refueling” convenience similar to ICEs, and the ability to operate adequately at low temperatures. Research into “next-gen lithium-ion” batteries which would provide such functionalities is one of the R&D focus areas. VTO is funding research on both “next gen” chemistries (which employ an alloy anode and/or a high voltage cathode) and beyond lithium-ion (BLI) chemistries (which can, for example, employ a lithium metal anode).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Nonsacrificial Additive for Tuning the Cathode–Electrolyte Interphase of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Solid–electrolyte interphases is essential for stable cycling of rechargeable batteries. The traditional approach for interphase design follows the decomposition of additives prior to the host electrolyte, which, as governed by the thermodynamic rule, however, inherently limits the viable additives. Here we report an alternative approach of using a nonsacrificial additive. This is exemplified by the localized high-concentration electrolytes, where the fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) plays a nonsacrificial role for modifying the chemistry, structure, and formation mechanism of the cathode–electrolyte interphase (CEI) layers toward enhanced cycling stability. On the basis of ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we further reveal that the unexpected activation of the otherwise inert species in the interphase formation is due to the FEC–Li + coordinated environment that altered the electronic states of reactants. In conclusion, the nonsacrificial additive on CEI formation opens up alternative avenues for the interphase design through the use of the commonly overlooked, anodically stable compounds.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗