Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Zaretzki, Russell L

Publications and source records attributed to Zaretzki, Russell L.

A Hydropower facility as an Energy Water Signal Processor

In recent times, various efforts have been made to address the challenge of adequately representing hydropower systems in modeling frameworks, accounting for the lack of data to represent the multiple constraints in hydropower operation. This research is a pilot data-driven methodology for characterizing, classifying, and comparing the water-to-energy and energy-to-water signal transformations that hydropower facilities as signal processors accomplish. In this study, a Box Jenkins transfer function/noise model is used to identify the relationship between reservoir inflows and outflows. For examining the feasibility of this methodology, 5-minute fleet data for five storage and five run-of-river facilities was provided by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and transfer function models are developed. The influence of past inflow and outflow values on the current outflow decisions was investigated and summarized by examining the results of Box Jenkins methodology. Finally, dominance analysis was introduced to add value to the Box Jenkins model results and provide different stakeholders with a set of concepts to convey the functionality of hydropower.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗

How R Developers explain their Package Choice: A Survey

Background: Contemporary software development relies heavily on reusing already implemented functionality, usually in the form of packages. Aims: We aim to shed light on developers' preferences when selecting packages in R language. Method: To do that, we create and administer a survey to over 1000 developers who have added one of two common dataframe enhancement libraries in R to their projects: data.table or tidyr. We design a questionnaire using the Social Contagion Theory (SCT) following prior work on technology adoption and ensure that key dimensions affecting developer choice are considered. Results: Of the 1085 developers we contacted, 803 completed the survey asking them to prioritize various factors known to affect developer perceptions of package quality and to provide their background. Most developers self-identified as data scientists with two to five years of work experience. We found significant differences between the preferences of developers who chose data.table and tidyr. Surprisingly, package reputation based on easy-to-see measures, such as the number of stars on GitHub, was not an important factor for either group. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the inherently social nature of package adoption. They can help design future studies on how different populations of developers make decisions on which software packages to use in their projects. Finally, package developers and maintainers can benefit by better understanding the prime concerns of the users of their packages.

Malviya Thakur, Addi↗