Phase-field model of strain effect on superconducting transitions and mesoscale pattern formation
Not Available
Fortino, Daniel (ORCID:000000033040384X)↗
Engineering topics
Xu, Jinchao
Publications and source records attributed to Xu, Jinchao.
An Efficient Numerical Algorithm for Solving Coupled Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau Equation for Superconductivity and Elasticity
A decoupled finite element algorithm is developed for simulating the vortex dynamics on an elastic superconductor which couples the time-dependent Ginzburg- Landau equation with the complex-valued superconducting order parameter and the vector-valued magnetic potential, and the elasticity equation. We present an iterative algorithm for the decoupled system arising from the time and spatial discretization using a combination of preconditioner, algebraic multigrid method (AMG) and preconditioned conjugate gradient method (PCG). The iterative algorithm allows us to perform large-scale three-dimensional simulations of mesoscale pattern formation during superconducting phase transitions with arbitrary elastic boundary conditions. Here, the performance and efficiency of the algorithm are numerically verified by several benchmark problems, exhibiting up to two orders of magnitude improvement depending on the scale of discrete system compared to the exact solver.
Efficiency↗
Lack of robustness and accuracy of many numerical schemes for phase-field simulations
In this paper, we study the stability, accuracy and convergence behavior of various numerical schemes for phase-field modeling through a simple ODE model. Both theoretical analysis and numerical experiments are carried out on this ODE model to demonstrate the limitation of most numerical schemes that have been used in practice. One main conclusion is that the first-order fully implicit scheme is the only robust algorithm for phase-field simulations while all other schemes (that have been analyzed) may have convergence issue if the time step size is not exceedingly small. More specifically, by rigorous analysis in most cases, we have the following conclusions: (i) The first-order fully implicit scheme converges to the correct steady state solution for all time step sizes. In the case of multiple solutions, one of the solution branches always converges to the correct steady state solution. (ii) The first-order convex splitting scheme, which is equivalent to the first-order fully implicit scheme with a different time scaling, always converges to the correct steady state solution but may seriously lack numerical accuracy for transient solutions. (iii) For the second-order fully implicit and convex splitting schemes, for any time step size $δt > 0$, there exists an initial condition $u_0$ , with $|u_0| > 1$, such that the numerical solution converges to the wrong steady state solution. (iv) For $|u_0|$ ≤ 1, all second-order schemes studied in this paper converge to the correct steady state solution although severe numerical oscillations occur for most of them if the time step size is not sufficiently small. (v) An unconditionally energy-stable scheme (such as the modified Crank–Nicolson scheme) is not necessarily better than a conditionally energy-stable scheme (such as the Crank–Nicolson scheme). Finally, most, if not all, of the above conclusions are expected to be true for more general Allen–Cahn and other phase-field models.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗