Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Xie, Xiaohong.
Catalysts comprising MoP and MoP 2 are disclosed, wherein the catalyst is a composite. The catalyst may have a molar ratio of MoP:MoP 2 within a range of 5:95 to 95:5. The catalyst may be used as a cathode active material for hydrogen generation from neutral pH solutions, such as wastewater or seawater. Methods of making the catalyst also are disclosed.
In this project, we developed multi-transition metal and nitrogen co-doped electrocatalysts for potential applications in rechargeable Zn-air batteries, reversible fuel cells.
Abstract The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) generally exists in electrochemistry‐enabled applications that are coupled with cathodic reactions like hydrogen evolution, carbon dioxide reduction, ammonia synthesis, and electrocatalytic hydrogenation. The OER heavily impacts the overall energy efficiency of these devices because the sluggish OER kinetics result in a huge overpotential, thus, a large amount of efficient catalysts are needed. The benchmark iridium and ruthenium (Ir/Ru)‐based materials (mostly used in acid media) are, however, significantly limited by their scarcity. Non‐precious metal‐based catalysts (NPMCs) have emerged as the most promising alternatives; however, they tend to degrade quickly under the harsh operating conditions of typical OER devices. Another challenge is the unsatisfying performance of OER catalysts when integrated in real‐world devices. Herein, the OER active sites for three mainstream types of NPMCs including non‐precious transition metal oxides/(oxy)hydroxides, metal‐free carbon materials, and hybrid non‐precious metal and carbon composites are reviewed. In addition, possible degradation mechanisms for active sites and mitigation strategies are discussed in detail. This review also provides insights into the gaps between R&D of NPMCs for the OER and their applications in practical devices.
Anion exchange member (AEM) fuel cells have gained great attention recently mainly owing to the advantages of non-precious metal catalysts application. Despite of the similar oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics in acid and base, the reaction kinetics of hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) is two orders of magnitude slower in alkaline systems than in acid. To understand the slower kinetics of HOR in base, two major interpretations have been proposed, including 1) hydrogen binding energy as a major descriptor for HOR in both acid and base; and 2) bifunctional theory based on the contributions from both hydrogen and hydroxide adsorption for HOR in alkaline electrolyte. Here, we discuss the possible HOR mechanisms in alkaline electrolytes with the corresponding Tafel behavior change. Besides the discussion of traditional Tafel-Volmer and Heyrovsky-Volmer HOR mechanisms, the recently proposed hydroxide adsorption step is discussed to illustrate the HOR mechanism difference in acid and base. We further correlate the hydroxide adsorption step involved mechanism with HOR catalyst design, and summarize its role in HOR and HER activities improvement in alkaline electrolyte over the same catalyst. The representative works of alkaline HOR catalyst development were briefly introduced, and the strategy of strengthening interaction between H2 desorption and H2O recombination was finally proposed for future HOR catalyst design in alkaline environment.
Not Available
Development of platinum group metal (PGM)-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has been a strategic research topic for proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Present state-of-art PGM-free ORR catalysts are Fe, N co-doped carbon (Fe-N-C) catalysts, which unfortunately exhibit instability concerns. Herein, we report a stable atomically dispersed Co, N co-doped carbon (Co-N-C) catalyst with high Co content of 1.0 at% and the active site, i.e., the coordination of Co, is CoN2+2 in nature. The Co-N-C catalyst demonstrated high ORR activity comparable to, and high stability over 3 times better than, that of the Fe-N-C catalyst. It also achieved a high activity of 22 mA cm2 at 0.9 ViR-free and a power density of 0.61 W cm-2 under 1.0 bar H2/O2. Further, we identify two main degradation mechanisms of the PGM-free catalysts: catalyst oxidation by H2O2/radicals and demetalation. The improved stability of Co-N-C relative to Fe-N-C is attributed to less Fenton-reactive nature of Co and significantly enhanced resistance to demetalation of Co-N-C.
Abstract Fuel cells as an attractive clean energy technology have recently regained popularity in academia, government, and industry. In a mainstream proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, platinum‐group‐metal (PGM)‐based catalysts account for ≈50% of the projected total cost for large‐scale production. To lower the cost, two materials‐based strategies have been pursued: 1) to decrease PGM catalyst usage (so‐called low‐PGM catalysts), and 2) to develop alternative PGM‐free catalysts. Grand stability challenges exist when PGM catalyst loading is decreased in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA)—the power generation unit of a PEM fuel cell—or when PGM‐free catalysts are integrated into an MEA. More importantly, there is a significant knowledge gap between materials innovation and device integration. For example, high‐performance electrocatalysts usually demonstrate undesired quick degradation in MEAs. This issue significantly limits the development of PEM fuel cells. Herein, recent progress in understanding the degradation of low‐PGM and PGM‐free catalysts in fuel cell MEAs and materials‐based solutions to address these issues are reviewed. The key factors that degrade the MEA performance are highlighted. Innovative, emerging material concepts and development of low‐PGM and PGM‐free catalysts are discussed.