Engineering topics

William K Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to William K Anderson.

7 records

NASA NTRS2024

FUN3D Manual: 14.1

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.1, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for formal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.

William K Anderson↗

NASA NTRS2023

FUN3D Manual: 14.0.2

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.0.2, including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for formal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.

William K Anderson↗

NASA NTRS2022

FUN3D Manual: 14.0

This manual describes the installation and execution of FUN3D version 14.0,including optional dependent packages. FUN3D is a suite of computational fluid dynamics simulation and design tools that uses mixed-element unstructured grids in a large number of formats, including structured multiblock and overset grid systems. A discretely-exact adjoint solver may be used for for-mal design optimization, error estimation, and mesh adaptation. FUN3D also offers a reacting, real-gas capability and provides GPU acceleration of many common simulation options.1

William K Anderson↗

NASA NTRS2020

Verification of Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation for Turbulent Simulations over ONERA M6 Wing

Unstructured anisotropic mesh adaptation is known to be an efficient way to control discretization errors in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Method verification is required to provide the confidence for routine use in production analysis. The current work aims at verification of anisotropic mesh adaptation for RANS simulations over the ONERA M6 wing. The present verification study is performed using four different flow solvers, three different implementations of the metric field, and three mesh mechanics packages. Two of the flow solvers use stabilized finite-element discretizations (FUN3D-SFE and GGNS), one uses finite-volume discretization (FUN3D-FV), and the last one uses mixed finite-volume and finite element discretizations (Wolf). The mesh adaptation is based on an error estimator that aims to control the quadratic error term in the linear interpolation of Mach number. Two sets of adaptations were performed; the first one controls the interpolation error in L2 norm and the second one controls the interpolation error in L4 norm. Convergence studies were performed on the forces and the pitching moment using all four solvers, and the results are compared with previously verified convergence studies on fixed (nonadapted) meshes. Both forces and pitching moment on adapted meshes are found to be converging to the fine mesh values faster than those on fixed meshes. In addition to forces and moments, convergence of surface pressure and skin friction coefficients at various measurement locations on the wing are also presented. Adapted-mesh surface pressure distributions agree with the fine fixed mesh pressure distributions. Adapted-mesh skin friction distributions contain high frequency noise with mean values approaching the fixed mesh pressure skin friction distributions.

Aravind Balan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Edge Based Viscous Method for Node-Centered Formulations

This paper presents a novel, efficient, conservative, edge-based method for evaluation of mean flow viscous fluxes and turbulence-model diffusion terms of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations on tetrahedral grids. The new method is implemented in a practical, node-centered, finite-volume computational fluid dynamics solver. The baseline finite-volume scheme that is equivalent to a second-order accurate finite-element Galerkin approximation of viscous stresses is reformulated. The order of operations to compute the cell-based Green-Gauss gradients is changed to combine the operations by edge, which leads to an equivalent formulation on tetrahedral grids, improves efficiency, and preserves the compact discretization stencil based on the nearest neighbors. The computational results presented in this paper verify the implementation of this edge-based method by comparing its accuracy and iterative convergence with those of the well verified and validated baseline formulation. Efficiency gains for residual and Jacobian evaluations result in significant reduction of time to solution. This novel edge-based formulation on tetrahedra can be seamlessly combined with the baseline formulation on cells of other types for computing solutions on mixed-element grids.

Edge Based↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Edge-Based Viscous Method for Mixed-Element Node-Centered Finite-Volume Solvers

A novel, efficient, edge-based viscous (EBV) discretization method has been recently developed, implemented in a practical, unstructured-grid, node-centered, finite-volume flow solver, and applied to viscous-kernel computations that include evaluations of meanflow viscous fluxes, turbulence-model and chemistry-model diffusion terms, and the corresponding Jacobian contributions. Initially, the EBV method had been implemented for tetrahedral grids and demonstrated multifold acceleration of all viscous-kernel computations. This paper presents an extension of the EBV method for mixed-element grids. In addition to the primal edges of a given mixed-element grid, virtual edges are introduced to connect cell nodes that are not connected by a primal edge. The EBV method uses an efficient loop over all (primal and virtual) edges and features a compact discretization stencil based on the nearest neighbors. This study verifies the EBV method and assesses its efficiency on mixed-element grids by comparing the EBV solution accuracy and iterative convergence with those of well-established solutions obtained using a cell-based viscous (CBV) discretization method. The EBV solver’s memory footprint is optimized and often smaller than the memory footprint of the CBV solver. A multifold speedup is demonstrated for all viscous-kernel computations resulting in significant reduction of the time to solutions for several benchmark mixed-element-grid computations, including simulations of a flow around NASA’s juncture-flow model and a hypersonic, chemically reacting flow around a blunt body.

Edge-based viscous method↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Edge-Based Viscous Method for Corner-Flow Solutions on Graphics Processing Units

A highly efficient, edge-based viscous (EBV) discretization method has been recently implemented in a practical, unstructured-grid, node-centered, finite-volume flow solver and evaluated for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) formulations. In comparison to a well-established cell-based viscous (CBV) method, the EBV method has demonstrated multifold acceleration of all viscous-kernel computations on general unstructured mixed-element grids. The viscous kernels include evaluation of viscous fluxes, diffusion terms in turbulence models, and the corresponding Jacobian terms. In this paper, an EBV implementation of a nonlinear extension of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, SA-neg-QCR2000, is presented and verified. The SA-neg-QCR2000 model is used for simulating turbulent corner flows. Previously reported EBV computations have been conducted on traditional computing architectures based on central processing units (CPU). This paper assesses benefits of the EBV method on modern high-performance computing architectures based on graphics processing units (GPU). The GPU implementations of the CBV and EBV methods are verified by comparing solutions and iterative convergence with those observed in CPU computations on the same grids. A comprehensive assessment of the EBV speedup on CPU and GPU architectures is presented for established benchmark corner flows, namely, a supersonic flow through a long square duct and a subsonic flow around a NASA juncture flow model.

CFD↗