Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

West, Anna

Publications and source records attributed to West, Anna.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Marine Energy Environmental Toolkit for Permitting and Licensing

The permitting and licensing process for marine energy in the U.S. could take up to 7 years for even small demonstrations or pilot studies despite existing resources like Tethys, MarineCadstre, and the FERC E-Library. The goal of the Marine Energy Environmental Toolkit Project was to increase regulators, developers, and marine energy innovators’ understanding of potential environmental effects of marine energy conversion devices deployments and provide information to make efficient and effective determinations during permitting and licensing; develop a one-stop shop for existing environmental, spatial, regulatory, and scientific data that allows users to access disparate sources of data through a series of tags and spatial queries. The Toolkit (marineenergy.app) builds upon prior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO) investments by pulling from WPTO-funded and outside resources to facilitate the permitting and licensing process, inform technology developers of required permits, and disseminate the latest knowledge of the environmental effects of these devices to regulators, developers, and marine energy innovators and stakeholders.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗
DOE OSTI2021

Marine Energy Environmental Permitting and Compliance Costs

Costs to permit Marine Energy projects are poorly understood. In this paper we examine environmental compliance and permitting costs for 19 projects in the U.S., covering the last 2 decades. Guided discussions were conducted with developers over a 3-year period to obtain historical and ongoing project cost data relative to environmental studies (e.g., baseline or pre-project site characterization as well as post-installation effects monitoring), stakeholder outreach, and mitigation, as well as qualitative experience of the permitting process. Data are organized in categories of technology type, permitted capacity, pre- and post-installation, geographic location, and funding types. We also compare our findings with earlier logic models created for the Department of Energy (i.e., Reference Models). Environmental studies most commonly performed were for Fish and Fisheries, Noise, Marine Habitat/Benthic Studies and Marine Mammals. Studies for tidal projects were more expensive than those performed for wave projects and the range of reported project costs tended to be wider than ranges predicted by logic models. For eight projects reporting full project costs, from project start to FERC or USACE permit, the average amount for environmental permitting compliance was 14.6%.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗
DOE OSTI2020

Environmental Permitting and Compliance Cost Reduction Strategies for the MHK Industry: Lessons Learned from Other Industries

The marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) industry plays a vital role in the U.S. clean energy strategy by providing a renewable, domestic energy source that may offset the need for traditional energy sources. The first MHK deployments in the U.S. have incurred very high permitting costs and long timelines for deploying projects, which increases project risk and discourages investment. A key challenge to advancing an economically competitive U.S. MHK industry is reducing the time and cost required for environmental permitting and compliance with government regulations. Other industries such as offshore oil and gas, offshore wind energy, subsea power and data cables, onshore wind energy, and solar energy facilities have all developed more robust permitting and compliance pathways that provide lessons for the MHK industry in the U.S. and may help inform the global consenting process. Based on in-depth review and research into each of the other industries, we describe the environmental permitting pathways, the main environmental concerns and types of monitoring typically associated with them, and factors that appear to have eased environmental permitting and compliance issues.

other industries↗
DOE OSTI2019

A Checklist of River Function Indicators for hydropower ecological assessment

Hydropower generation has benefits for societies that seek low-carbon, renewable energy alternatives, but sustainable hydropower production will require an explicit consideration of potential tradeoffs between socioeconomic and environmental priorities. These tradeoffs are typically explored during a formal environmental impact assessment process that can be complex and controversial. The steps taken to address stakeholder concerns through impact hypotheses and field studies are not always transparent. We have designed a Checklist of River Function Indicators to facilitate stakeholder discussions during hydropower licensing and to support more transparent, holistic, and scientifically informed hydropower environmental analyses. Based on a database of environmental metrics collected from hydropower project studies documented by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the International Hydropower Association, the Low Impact Hydropower Institute, and peer-reviewed scientific literature, our proposed Checklist of River Function Indicators contains 51 indicators in six categories. We have tested the usefulness of the Indicators by applying them to seven hydropower projects documented by FERC. Among the case study projects, 44 of the 51 Indicators were assessed according to the FERC documentation. Although each hydropower project presents unique natural resource issues and stakeholder priorities, the proposed Indicators can provide a transparent starting point for stakeholder discussions about which ecological impacts should be considered in hydropower planning and relicensing assessments.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2019

Instruction Manual: River Function Questionnaire

The River Function Questionnaire (Questionnaire) is a series of questions designed to help stakeholders determine the impacts of hydropower on a series of environmental indicators, i.e. river functions, that may need to be understood or addressed through additional field studies or environmental assessments. In order to provide a platform accessible to many users, the questionnaire was developed in Microsoft Excel with convenient macro-enabled interactive features. The Questionnaire was developed under the Department of Energy (DOE)-funded Environmental Metrics for Hydropower (EMH) project in FY 2018. This document provides an instruction manual that provides overall guidance and step-by-step instructions for use.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2018

2018 Webinar Summary: MHK Environmental Compliance Cost Reduction Strategies Workshop

This three-year effort started in FY17 with the primary objective of detailing the environmental compliance costs and lessons learned from U.S. based MHK projects that have gone through the permitting and compliance process. The project goal is to find ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the permitting and compliance process that reduce deployment uncertainties and associated risks/costs; ultimately encouraging investment in MHK projects. The project team is composed of Sandia National Laboratories, H. T. Harvey & Associates, Integral Consulting, and Kearns & West. Step one of the project process, collect data to determine permitting and compliance costs, was a focus during 2017, but is an ongoing process to ensure the project team is working with the most recent and accurate data as possible. Currently, the project team is focusing on step two of the project process, identify cost reduction pathways. Step three, develop cost reduction strategies, will follow during Fall 2018 and Winter 2019. Each step is envisioned as an iterative approach working with industry and regulators to best meet the project goal.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2018

2018 Workshop Summary: MHK Environmental Compliance Cost Reduction Strategies Workshop

This three-year effort started in FY17 with the primary objective of detailing the environmental compliance costs and lessons learned from U.S. based MHK projects that have gone through the permitting and compliance process. The project goal is to find ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the permitting and compliance process that reduce deployment uncertainties and associated risks/costs; ultimately encouraging investment in MHK projects. The project team is composed of Sandia National Laboratories, H. T. Harvey & Associates, Integral Consulting, and Kearns & West. Step one of the project process, collect data to determine permitting and compliance costs, was a focus during 2017, but is an ongoing process to ensure the project team is working with the most recent and accurate data as possible. Currently, the project team is focusing on step two of the project process, identify cost reduction pathways. Step three, develop cost reduction strategies, will follow during Fall 2018 and Winter 2019. Each step is envisioned as an iterative approach working with industry and regulators to best meet the project goal.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗