Weaver, Harold | Engineering Papers

NASA NTRS2018

Evolution of H2O Production in Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON) as Inferred from Forbidden Oxygen and OH Emission

We present H2O production rates for comet C/2012 S1 (ISON) derived from observations of [O I] and OH emission during its inbound leg, covering a heliocentric distance range of 1.8–0.44 AU. Our production rates are in agreement with previous measurements using a variety of instruments and techniques and with data from the various observatories greatly differing in their projected fields of view. The consistent results across all data suggest the absence of an extended source of H2O production, for example sublimation of icy grains in the coma, or a source with spatial extent confined to the dimensions of the smallest projected field of view (in this case < 1000 km). We find that ISON had an active area of around 10 sq km for heliocentric distances Rh > 1.2 AU, which then decreased to about half this value from Rh = 1.2–0.9 AU. This was followed by a rapid increase in active area at about Rh = 0.6 AU, corresponding to the first of three major outbursts ISON experienced inside of 1 AU. The combination of a detected outburst in the light curve and rapid increase in active area likely indicates a major nucleus fragmentation event. The 5–10 sq km active area observed outside of Rh = 0.6 AU is consistent with a 50–100% active fraction for the nucleus, larger than typically observed for cometary nuclei. Although the absolute value of the active area is somewhat dependent on the thermal model employed, the changes in active area observed are consistent among models. The conclusion of a 50–100+% active fraction is robust for realistic thermal models of the nucleus. However the possibility of a contribution of a spatially unresolved distribution of icy grains cannot be discounted. As our [OI]-derived H2O production rates are consistent with values derived using other methods, we conclude that the contribution of O2 photodissociation to the observed [O I] emission is at most 5–10% that of the contribution of H2O for ISON. This is consistent with the expected contribution of O2 photodissociation if O2/H2O ∼ 4%, meaning [O I] emission can still be utilized as a reliable proxy for H2O production in comets as long as O2/H2O ≲ 4%, similar to the abundance measured by the ROSINA instrument on Rosetta at comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko.

Coma↗

NASA NTRS2016

Far-Ultraviolet Observations of Comet C 2012 S1 (ISON) From Fortis

We have used the unique far-UV imaging capability offered by a sounding-rocket-borne instrument to acquire observations of C/2012 S1 (ISON) when its angular separation with respect to the Sun was 26 deg.3 on 2013 November 20.49. At the time of observation, the comet's heliocentric distance and velocity relative to the Sun were r h = 0.43 au and r (sub h) = 62.7 km s)exp. -1). Images dominated by C Iota Lambda 1657 and H Iota Lambda 1216 were acquired over a 10(exp. 6) x 10(exp. 6) km(exp. 2) region. The water production rate implied by the Ly Alpha observations is constrained to be Q H2O is much greater than 8 x 10(exp. 29) s(exp. -1) while the neutral carbon production rate was Q(sub c) is much greater than 4 x 10(exp. 28) s(exp. -1). The radial profile of C I was consistent with it being a dissociation product of a parent molecule with a lifetime T is approx. 5 x 10(exp. 4) s, favoring a parent other than CO. We constrain the Q(sub co) production rate to 5(+1.5)(-7.5), 10(exp. 28) s(exp. -1) with 1 sigma errors derived from photon statistics. The upper limit on the Q (sub CO)/Q(sub H2O) is 6%.

sounding rocket↗

NASA NTRS2014

Geology Before Pluto: Pre-Encounter Considerations

The cameras of New Horizons will provide robust data sets that should be imminently amenable to geological analysis of the Pluto systems landscapes. In this paper, we begin with a brief discussion of the planned observations by the New Horizons cameras that will bear most directly on geological interpretability. Then we broadly review the major geological processes that could potentially operate on the surfaces of Pluto and its major moon Charon. We first survey exogenic processes (i.e. those for which energy for surface modification is supplied externally to the planetary surface): impact cratering, sedimentary processes (including volatile migration), and the work of wind. We conclude with an assessment of the prospects for endogenic activity in the form of tectonics and cryovolcanism.

Pluto↗