Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Walter F Miller

Publications and source records attributed to Walter F Miller.

11 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cloud Macrophysical Changes Observed by MODIS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat for the 11-year Period

Using the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO), and CloudSatsatellitemeasurements, cloud macrophysicalchanges are examined from 2007 to 2017(Ham et al., 2021). Particularly, we compare cloud changes derived from MODIS passive sensor and CALIPSO-CloudSat (CALCS) combined active sensor measurements. Both MODIS and CALCS well capture general features of the cloud changes related to El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. However, because of better detections of thin cirrus clouds, CALCS cloud volume anomalies are better correlated with relative humidity anomalies, compared to MODIS. In addition, MODIS observations show a stronger anticorrelation between low and mid/high cloud volume anomalies, compared to CALCS, mainly due to limitations in detecting overlapping clouds by MODIS passive sensor.In addition, the geometrical thickness of MODIS mid/high clouds is thinner than that from CALCS, less affecting cloud amounts at 0-3 km altitude.

Cloud↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Shortwave Broadband Irradiance Computations Using Cloud Properties Combined from CALIPSO, CloudSat, and MODIS

In this study, cloud properties measured from the CALIPSO, CloudSat, and MODIS (CCM) are used for top-of-atmosphere (TOA) shortwave (SW) broadband (BB) irradiance computations. The CALIPSO and CloudSat active sensors provide detailed cloud vertical profiles, but these occasionally miss parts of the cloud columns due to the full attenuation of sensor signals, surface clutter, or insensitivity to a certain range of cloud particle sizes. As a result, the CCM-merged cloud extinction coefficient profiles can be underestimated. Therefore, we compare the column-integrated visible scaled cloud optical depth (VSCOD) of the CCM-merged cloud extinction coefficient profile with the MODIS-estimated VSCOD and apply a scaling factor to the CCM-merged cloud extinction profile. The VSCOD is defined as a visible cloud optical depth multiplied by (1¬–asymmetry parameter). The SW irradiances are computed using the scaled CCM-merged cloud extinction coefficient and effective radius profiles. It is shown that the multi-sensor-combined cloud profiles significantly reduce positive TOA SW BB biases, compared to those with MODIS-derived cloud properties only. The improvement is more pronounced for optically thick clouds, where MODIS ice particle effective radius is largely underestimated.

Cloud↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CERES FLASHFlux: Low Latency Data Product for Education and Applied Science Uses

The Fast Longwave and Shortwave Radiative Flux (FLASHFlux) data product was developed to provide a rapid release version of the CERES results, which are made available to the GLOBE (Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment) program and the applied science research communities involving in the renewable energy and agricultural sectors within a week of the satellite observations by exchanging some accuracy for speed. FLASHFlux provides two data products: 1) an hourly Level 2 Single Scanner Footprint (SSF) data separately for Terra, Aqua, and NOAA-20 observations, and 2) a daily Level 3 Time Interpolated and Spatially Averaged (TISA) 1-degree equal angle gridded data the combines Terra and Aqua observations. However, since both Terra and Aqua satellites are nearing end of life, the FLASHFlux data product will begin to transition to utilizing NOAA-20 observation in the TISA data product. The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on board the NOAA-20 and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on board the Aqua satellites have different optics and spectral channels. We quantify the differences in the Level 2 SSF data products between the two satellites over a few sample months for cloud and radiative flux quantities for both the shortwave (solar wavelengths) and longwave (thermal infrared wavelengths) at TOA and surface. In addition, we also assess the impact of using NOAA-20 in place of Aqua in the Level 3 FLASHFlux TISA daily product on the TOA and surface radiative fluxes. Additionally, we highlight use case of FLASHFlux data product in combination with CERES EBAF to assess the Earth’s Radiation Budget, the accuracy of FLASHFlux data product compares to Surface sites measurement, and users of the FLASHFlux data through the POWER (Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources) program.

PC Sawaengphokhai↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Machine Learning Approach to Determine Surface Radiative Fluxes based on CERES Observations

The Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) projects provides satellite-based observations of the radiative fluxes and clouds systems. CERES climate quality data products typically take several months of calibration and validation before release to the public. An alternative data product, Fast Longwave and Shortwave radiative Flux (FLASHFlux), was created to provide data to the applied sciences and educational users. FLASHFlux provides Top-of-Atmosphere radiative fluxes, Clouds properties, and parameterized surface radiative fluxes within four days for footprint (Level 2) data. We investigate the use of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) using MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) derived clouds properties and meteorology from the Global Assimilation and Meteorology Office (GMAO) scaled to the CERES footprint from the CERES Clouds Radiative Swath (CRS) data product to compute surface radiative fluxes. We test ANN produce fluxes against surface fluxes produced from the Fu-Liou model used in CRS and the Langley Parameterized Shortwave Algorithm (LPSA) and Langley Parameterized Longwave Algorithm (LPLA) used in FLASHFlux. We also validated each model with ground-based observations. Furthermore, we investigate Leave-One-Feature-Out Importance (LOFO) to evaluate the significance of each feature in our training and provide insight for future models. Advances in machine learning, along with increases in computational capabilities and available data allow us to estimate effects of unresolved processes in our climate without direct modeling. This work evaluates the ability to create accurate data-driven models to supplement or replace current models that estimate surface radiative fluxes.

Climatology↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessing the Uncertainty Impact of CERES Fast Longwave and SHortwave Radiative Flux (FLASHFlux) Level 3 Product With and Without Terra Observations

The Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project provides satellite-based observations of how Earth’s energy flows are varying in time and space and how clouds and aerosols are affecting the Earth’s radiation budget. Nominally, CERES data products require months of validation and calibration before releasing a climate quality data. The Fast Longwave And SHortwave radiative Flux (FLASHFlux) data product was developed to provide data for applied science research involving the renewable energy and agricultural sectors within a week of observation. FLASHFlux achieves this by using simplified calibration, an operational meteorological product from Global Monitoring and Assimilation Office (GMAO), and a surface parameterizations model. The CERES FLASHFlux provides two data products: 1) an hourly Level 2 Single Scanner Footprint (SSF) data separately for Terra and NOAA-20 observations. 2) a daily Level 3 Time Interpolated and Spatially Averaged (TISA) gridded data that combines NOAA-20 and Terra observations on a one-degree equal angle grid. FLASHFlux TISA data product interpolate on a diurnal model that assumes a satellite equilateral crossing time of 10:30 AM and 1:30 PM from Terra and Aqua, respectively. Aqua was replaced by NOAA-20 starting on September 2022. Terra is planned to be replace by the Satellite ClOud and Radiation Property retrieval System (SatCORPS) soon. We are currently using the Terra observations as it continues to drift. We assess the impact of FLASHFlux TISA data when Terra is removed. An uncertainty estimate of the Top-Of-Atmosphere (TOA) fluxes are given of FLASHFlux Version4A (before Terra drift) and Version4B (current), and Version4B (no Terra) in comparison to the CERES EBAF and SYN1deg. In addition, we compare FLASHFlux Version4B and Version4B (no Terra) surface radiative fluxes to ground base measurements to determine the impact of running without Terra data.

PC Sawaengphokhai↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Surface Longwave and Shortwave Fluxes Trained on CERES Observations

The Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) project provides satellite-based observations of the radiative fluxes and clouds systems. CERES climate quality data products typically take several months of calibration and validation before release to the public. The Fast Longwave and Shortwave Radiative Flux (FLASHFlux) data product was developed to provide key data for the applied sciences and educational users within a week of observation. FLASHFlux achieves this by using simplified calibration, an operational meteorological product from Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO), and its own surface parameterizations model. The CERES FLASHFlux provides two data products: 1) an hourly Level 2 Single Scanner Footprint (SSF) data separately for Terra and NOAA-20 observations, and 2) a daily Level 3 Time Interpolated and Spatially Averaged (TISA) 1o x 1o gridded data that combines Terra and NOAA-20 observations. Currently, FLASHFlux uses the Langley Parameterized Shortwave Algorithm (LPSA) and Langley Parameterized Longwave Algorithm (LPLA) to derive its surface fluxes (Kratz et al., 2010; Gupta et al, 2001). A new Machine Learning (ML) based approach using Artificial Neural Networks to derive Surface Longwave (LW) & Shortwave (SW) fluxes based on training data from the CERES Clouds Radiative Swath (CRS) product is being investigated to replace LPSA and LPLA in the SSF surface flux products. One of the biggest hurdles in training ML model is model fitting. To overcome the problem of overfitting we use feature engineering that helps in finding the important feature and remove features that are irrelevant to the model. In our training we employed the Leave-One-Feature-Out Importance (LOFO) to evaluate the significance of each feature in our training. We intercompare ANN fluxes against surface fluxes produced from the Fu-Liou model in CRS and the LPSA/LPLA in FLASHFlux SSF. Furthermore, we validated ANN derived fluxes to the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN).

P C Sawaengphokhai↗