Engineering topics

V M Canuto

Publications and source records attributed to V M Canuto.

3 records

NASA NTRS2021

Do Sub-Mesoscales Inhibit Destruction of PV?

We present the first explicit form of the three components, advective, diabatic and frictional of the PV J fluxes contributed by sub-mesoscales SM. Of particular interest is the surface value of the vertical frictional PV flux which when positive, can induce destruction of PV by down-front winds. The 2005 numerical simulations of Thomas confirmed that this is indeed the case. However, since the 12 km numerical resolution could not account for sub-mesoscales SM (0.1-10) km, the effect of SM on the PV destruction process could not be quantified. The goal of this work is to provide an answer to that question asked in the title. The two SM parameterizations entering the problem, the vertical buoyancy flux and the momentum flux (Reynolds stresses), bring about a new feature, the dependence on the SM kinetic energy (represented by the dimensionless Rossby number Ro), that causes unexpected results. While in the absence of SM, there were no restrictions on where PV destruction could occur, in the presence of SM, the condition of a positive surface vertical frictional flux is restricted to SM regimes with very low Ro<1 and very high Ro>10. Since the SM kinetic energy is location dependent, so is PV destruction. The effect of SM seems to make PV destruction a much rarer occurrence than previously thought.

potential vorticity↗

NASA NTRS2020

Sub-Mesoscales at Ocean Fronts: Dissipation of Eddy Kinetic Energy

D’Asaro et al. measured the dissipation of eddy kinetic energy at the Kuroshio ocean front, found it to be 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than the value predicted by the law of the wall and suggested that the enhancement is due to sub-mesoscales, SM. To assess their suggestion, we employ two SM models. In the first model the buoyancy flux is based on baroclinic instabilities only and there is no momentum flux (Reynolds stresses). The model is unable to reproduce the Kuroshio data. The second model includes baroclinic instabilities, wind stress and Reynolds stresses. It reproduces the data satisfactorily. The analytic formula for the dissipation that we present can be used in OGCMs to parameterize dissipation at ocean fronts other than Kuroshio, e.g., Gulf Stream and ACC, an extension that could improve the predictions of climate studies.

sub-mesoscale models↗

NASA NTRS2019

ACC Subduction by Mesoscales

The mesoscale contribution to Subduction in the Southern Ocean was recently studied by Salle'e and Rintoul (2011, SR) using the following mesoscale model. The adiabatic A-regime was modeled with the GM stream function, the diabatic D-regime was modeled with tapering functions,the D-A interface was taken to be at the mixed layer depth and the mesoscale diffusivity was either a constant or given by a 2D model. Since the resulting subductions were an order of magnitude smaller than the data of ±200 m/yr (Mazloff et al., 2010), SR showed that if instead of the above model-dependent mesoscale diffusivities, they employed the ones by Salle'e et al. (2008) from surface drifter observations, the subductions compared significantly better with the data. On those grounds, SR suggested a tenfold increase of the diffusivity. In this work, we suggest that since the mesoscale diffusivity is but one component of a muc large mesoscale parameterization, one should first assess the latter's overall performance followed by the assessment of the predicted ACC subduction. We employ the mesoscale model formulated31 in Canuto et al. (2018; 2019, that includes recent theoretical and observational advances and that was assessed against a variety of data including the output of 17 other OGCMs. The ACC diffusivities compare well with drifter data by Salle'e et al. (2008) and the ACC subduction rates are in agreement with the data.

V M Canuto↗