Applying Large Graph Neural Networks to Predict Transition Metal Complex Energies Using the tmQM_wB97MV Data Set
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Ulissi, Zachary W..
Not Available
Not Available
Catalyst discovery is paramount to support access to energy and key chemical feedstocks in a post fossil fuel era. Exhaustive computational searches of large material design spaces using ab initio methods like density functional theory (DFT) are infeasible. We seek to explore large design spaces at relatively low computational cost by leveraging large, generalized, graph-based machine learning (ML) models, which are pretrained and therefore require no upfront data collection or training. We present Catlas, a framework that distributes and automates the generation of adsorbate-surface configurations and ML inference of DFT energies to achieve this goal. Catlas is open source, making ML assisted catalyst screenings easy and available to all. To demonstrate its efficacy, we use Catlas to explore catalyst candidates for the direct conversion of syngas to multi-carbon oxygenates. For this case study, we explore 947 stable/metastable binary, transition metal intermetallics as possible catalyst candidates. On this subset of materials, we are able to predict the adsorption energy of key descriptors, *CO and *OH, with good accuracy (0.16, 0.14 eV MAE, respectively). Using the projected selectivity towards C 2+ oxygenates from an existing microkinetic model, we identified 144 candidate materials. For 10 promising candidates, DFT calculations reveal a good correlation with our assessment using ML. Finally, among the top elemental combinations were Pt–Ti, Pd–V, Ni–Nb, and Ti–Zn, all of which appear unexplored experimentally.
Electrocatalysis provides a potential solution to NO 3 - pollution in wastewater by converting it to innocuous N 2 gas. However, materials with excellent catalytic activity are typically limited to expensive precious metals, hindering their commercial viability. Here, in response to this challenge, we have conducted the most extensive computational search to date for electrocatalysts that can facilitate NO 3 - reduction reaction, starting with 59 390 candidate bimetallic alloys from the Materials Project and Automatic-Flow databases. Using a joint machine learning- and computation-based screening strategy, we evaluated our candidates based on corrosion resistance, catalytic activity, N 2 selectivity, cost, and the ability to synthesize. We found that only 20 materials will satisfy all criteria in our screening strategy, all of which contain varying amounts of Cu. Our proposed list of candidates is consistent with previous materials investigated in the literature, with the exception of Cu–Co and Cu–Ag based compounds that merit further investigation.
We report the recent boom in computational chemistry has enabled several projects aimed at discovering useful materials or catalysts. We acknowledge and address two recurring issues in the field of computational catalyst discovery. First, calculating macro-scale catalyst properties is not straightforward when using ensembles of atomic-scale calculations [e.g., density functional theory (DFT)]. We attempt to address this issue by creating a multi-scale model that estimates bulk catalyst activity using adsorption energy predictions from both DFT and machine learning models. The second issue is that many catalyst discovery efforts seek to optimize catalyst properties, but optimization is an inherently exploitative objective that is in tension with the explorative nature of early-stage discovery projects. In other words, why invest so much time finding a “best” catalyst when it is likely to fail for some other, unforeseen problem? We address this issue by relaxing the catalyst discovery goal into a classification problem: “What is the set of catalysts that is worth testing experimentally?” Here, we present a catalyst discovery method called myopic multiscale sampling, which combines multiscale modeling with automated selection of DFT calculations. It is an active classification strategy that seeks to classify catalysts as “worth investigating” or “not worth investigating” experimentally. Our results show an ~7–16 times speedup in catalyst classification relative to random sampling. These results were based on offline simulations of our algorithm on two different datasets: a larger, synthesized dataset and a smaller, real dataset.