An Energy Method for Determining the Most Dynamics Responsive Axis of a Structure
No abstract available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Tsuha, Walter S..
No abstract available
No abstract available
Report discusses enhanced projection-and-assembly (EP&A) method and its application to Galileo spacecraft. EP&A method and its predecessor, projection-and-assembly (P&A) method, described in "Enhanced Method of Reduction of Mathematical Models" (NPO-18402), and "Two-Stage Reduction of Dynamical Models" (NPO-18723).
No longer necessary to solve eigenvalue problems of high order. Component-mode projection-and-assembly model-reduction (COMPARE) method provides approximation of dynamics of vibrations of complicated, multiple flexible bodies by use of mathematical models of reduced order. Incorporates component-mode synthesis (CMS) method and enhanced projection-and-assembly (EP&A) method, described in "Enhanced Method of Reduction of Dynamical Models" (NPO-18402), providing for somewhat simplified two-stage process in which order of applicable mathematical models reduced. Reduced-order models used to design algorithms of control systems to suppress vibrations or otherwise control structure.
A two-stage model reduction methodology, combining the classical Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) method and the newly developed Enhanced Projection and Assembly (EP&A) method, is proposed in this research. The first stage of this methodology, called the COmponent Modes Projection and Assembly model REduction (COMPARE) method, involves the generation of CMS mode sets, such as the MacNeal-Rubin mode sets. These mode sets are then used to reduce the order of each component model in the Rayleigh-Ritz sense. The resultant component models are then combined to generate reduced-order system models at various system configurations. A composite mode set which retains important system modes at all system configurations is then selected from these reduced-order system models. In the second stage, the EP&A model reduction method is employed to reduce further the order of the system model generated in the first stage. The effectiveness of the COMPARE methodology has been successfully demonstrated on a high-order, finite-element model of the cruise-configured Galileo spacecraft.
Enhanced projection-and-assembly method is recent product of efforts to model mathematically dynamics of vibrations of large, flexible structures. In projection-and-assembly method modes contributing significantly to control input and output points selected at system (overall structure) level, then projected (in abstract mathematical sense) onto components of system. In enhanced version, static correction modes capture static contributions of those modes neglected in reduced-order model. Reduced models for suppressing vibrations of structures made more accurate.
The Topex/Poseidon satellite's structural development approach adhered to more stringent requirements than previous efforts, since this spacecraft must withstand not only launch/flight loads but also those planned for the 'protoflight' vehicle's structural and environmental tests. There requirements encompassed conservatively estimated design loads, high safety factors, and extensive analytical simulations. The structural adequacy of the satellite was verified by means of a ground testing program to comply with both JPL institutional requirements and Arianespace requirements. Modal survey tests of the satellite have been successfully completed.
A two-stage model reduction methodology, combining the classical Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) method and the newly developed Enhanced Projection and Assembly (EP&A) method is proposed in this research. The first stage of this methodology, called COmponent Mode Projection and Assembly model REduction (COMPARE) method, involves the generations of CMS mode sets, such as the MacNeal-Rubin mode sets. These mode sets are then used to reduce the order of each component model in the Rayleigh-Ritz sense. The resultant component models are then combined to generate reduced-order system models at various system configurations. A composite mode set which retains important system modes at all system configurations is then selected from these reduced-order system models. In the second stage, the EP&A model reduction method is employed to reduce further the order of the system model generated in the first stage. The effectiveness of the COMPARE methodology has been successfully demonstrated on a high-order, finite-element model of the cruise-configured Galileo spacecraft.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A structural verification program applied to qualifying two heritage composite antenna reflectors for flight on the TOPEX satellite is outlined. The verification requirements and an integrated analyses/test approach employed to meet these requirements are described. Structural analysis results and qualification vibration test data are presented and discussed. It was determined that degradation of the composite and bonding materials caused by long-term exposure to an uncontrolled environment had not severely impaired the integrity of the reflector structures. The reflectors were assessed to be structurally adequate for the intended TOPEX application.
An enhanced projection and assembly (P and A) method employing static correction modes to either the retained mode set of the system or the projected mode sets of the components is presented. The effectiveness of the proposed technique was successfully demonstrated on a 13-DOF mass-spring model and a high-order finite element model of the Galileo spacecraft. When applied to the Galileo cruise model, the system-level augmented P and A method significantly alleviates the zero-mismatch problem found in previous studies.
Many flexible multibody dynamics simulation codes require some form of component description that properly characterizes the dynamic behavior of the system. A model reduction procedure for producing low order component models for flexible multibody simulation is described. Referred to as projection and assembly, the method is a Rayleigh-Ritz approach that uses partitions of the system modal matrix as component Ritz transformation matrices. It is shown that the projection and assembly method yields a reduced system model that preserves a specified set of the full order system modes. Unlike classical component mode synthesis methods, the exactness of the method described is obtained at the expense of having to compute the full order system modes. The paper provides a comprehensive description of the method, a proof of exactness, and numerical results demonstrating the method's effectiveness.
This paper explains the projection and assembly model reduction method which has been used to derive reduced order component models for the Galileo spacecraft. Assembly of reduced order component models produces a reduced order system model which can then be used in multibody simulation codes for efficient run times. The methodology is explained and a proof is given showing the exact reproduction of selected significant system modes. Frequency bounds are obtained for all modes produced when the reduced order components are assembled. The projection and assembly method is demonstrated on two examples. The first example is a simplified model of the Galileo spacecraft, while the second example is the model of the Galileo spacecraft in its early mission configuration. When articulation of components is allowed, the method may not reproduce all system modes precisely. Remedies for this problem are suggested.
This paper describes a procedure for the selection of component modes employed in discretization of component deformation in a flexible multibody spacecraft. The emphasis is placed on the selection of modes which adequately represent the interaction of the various on-board control systems with the vehicle structural flexibility. The method combines the component mode synthesis approaches of Craig-Bampton (1968), MacNeal (1971) and Rubin (1975), and Benfield-Hruda (1971) with the modal balancing method of Moore (1981) and Gregory (1984). The procedure, which is applicable to both articulating and nonarticulating systems, was used to develop a low-order model of the three-body articulating Galileo spacecraft.
The assumed-modes method in multibody dynamics allows the elastic deformation of each component in the system to be approximated by a sum of products of spatial and temporal functions commonly known as modes and modal coordinates respectively. The choice of component modes used to model articulating and non-articulating flexible multibody systems is examined. Attention is directed toward three classical Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) methods whereby component normal modes are generated by treating the component interface (I/F) as either fixed, free, or loaded with mass and stiffness contributions from the remaining components. The fixed and free I/F normal modes are augmented by static shape functions termed constraint and residual modes respectively. A mode selection procedure is outlined whereby component modes are selected from the Craig-Bampton (fixed I/F plus constraint), MacNeal-Rubin (free I/F plus residual), or Benfield-Hruda (loaded I/F) mode sets in accordance with a modal ordering scheme derived from balance realization theory. The success of the approach is judged by comparing the actuator-to-sensor frequency response of the reduced order system with that of the full order system over the frequency range of interest. A finite element model of the Galileo spacecraft serves as an example in demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed mode selection method.