Engineering topics

Toll, D. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Toll, D. L..

23 records · Page 2

NASA NTRS1982

Urban change detection procedures using Landsat digital data

Landsat multispectral scanner data was applied to an urban change detection problem in Denver, CO. A dichotomous key yielding ten stages of residential development at the urban fringe was developed. This heuristic model allowed one to identify certain stages of development which are difficult to detect when performing digital change detection using Landsat data. The stages of development were evaluated in terms of their spectral and derived textural characteristics. Landsat band 5 (0.6-0.7 micron) and texture data produced change detection maps which were approximately 81 percent accurate. Results indicated that the stage of development and the spectral/textural features affect the change in the spectral values used for change detection. These preliminary findings will hopefully prove valuable for improved change detection at the urban fringe.

Jensen, J. R.↗

NASA NTRS1981

Urban area update procedures using Landsat data

Landsat digital enhancements and classification maps are shown to be useful for updating the urban expansion of standard metropolitan statistical areas on a macro scale. Automated procedures for detecting nonurban to urban land coverage change using multitemporal Landsat data are investigated for five metropolitan areas, showing an overall delineation similar to that obtained from large scale aerial photography. The evaluated change detection procedures include image differencing, principal component transformation prior to differencing, and post classification comparison. Results show that image differencing techniques in MSS band 5 provide the most accurate land cover change detections.

Toll, D. L.↗

NASA NTRS1980

Preliminary evidence for the influence of physiography and scale upon the autocorrelation function of remotely sensed data

Previously established results demonstrate that LANDSAT data are autocorrelated and can be described by a univariate linear stochastic process known as auto-regressive-integrated-moving-average model of degree 1, 0, 1 or ARIMA (1, 0, 1). This model has two coefficients of interest for interpretation phi(1) and theta(1). In a comparison of LANDSAT thematic mapper simulator (TMS) data and LANDSAT MSS data several results were established: (1) The form of the relatedness as described by this model is not dependent upon system look angle or pixel size. (2) The phi(1) coefficient increases with decreasing pixel size and increasing topographic complexity. (3) Changes in topography have a greater influence upon phi(1) than changes in land cover class. (4) The theta(1) seems to vary with the amount of atmospheric haze. These patterns of variation in phi(1) and theta(1) are potentially exploitable by the remote sensing community to yield stochastically independent sets of observations, characterize topography, and reduce the number of bytes needed to store remotely sensed data.

Labovitz, M. L.↗

NASA NTRS1980

Evaluating LANDSAT wildland classification accuracies

Procedures to evaluate the accuracy of LANDSAT derived wildland cover classifications are described. The evaluation procedures include: (1) implementing a stratified random sample for obtaining unbiased verification data; (2) performing area by area comparisons between verification and LANDSAT data for both heterogeneous and homogeneous fields; (3) providing overall and individual classification accuracies with confidence limits; (4) displaying results within contingency tables for analysis of confusion between classes; and (5) quantifying the amount of information (bits/square kilometer) conveyed in the LANDSAT classification.

Toll, D. L.↗

NASA NTRS1980

Preliminary results of mapping urban land cover with Seasat SAR imagery

The detectability of urban land cover types is explored using digitally processed Seasat SAR imagery of the Denver, Colorado area. Test sites within the metropolitan area were selected to include a cross section of Anderson, et. al. Level II land cover classes and cover types representative of the urban area growth stages. Using the Image 100 interactive processing system each test site was level sliced in an attempt to define specific reflectance boundaries for each cover type and to determine the spectral and spatial characteristics of homogeneous response regions. The rural-urban fringe boundary was readily definable, but a precise Level I and Level II land cover classification was not possible. High density housing could be separated from low density housing and from parks, but reflectance values were often look angle dependent. Confusion between some water and vegetation responses also posed problems.

Henderson, F. M.↗