Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Thompson, Zachary J.

Publications and source records attributed to Thompson, Zachary J..

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Nondestructive property and defect characterization using X-rays and neutrons

As advanced manufacturing (AM) continues to mature as a fabrication technique, interest in its use for the fabrication of nuclear components continues to grow. AM nuclear parts offer the ability to create parts with complex and non-standard geometries that cannot be produced using traditional manufacturing techniques, circumvention of supply chain issues, and reduction of time from design to implementation. However, components fabricated with AM techniques must undergo nondestructive examination (NDE) to ensure they are fabricated to the required specifications to ensure safe and proper operation. The Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (AMMT) program has undertaken initial exploratory studies on several NDE techniques to evaluate their feasibility for research and development (R&D), as well as Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC), and in-service inspections of AM parts. This work describes research results on several techniques, including X-ray and neutron tomography and scattering, as well as photothermal radiometry. The experimental results are described and an overview for each techniques’ potential use on AM parts in the various phases of part development and lifetime is given. Finally, future directions for technique development and application to AM nuclear components are described.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Material Identification Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

Two implementations of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were studied to identify materials using X-ray attenuation data taken with the Digital Radiography and Computed Tomography (DRCT) systems that were developed for the Recovered Chemical Materiel Directorate (RCMD). Maitrejean et al.’s approach utilizes eigen effects through Principal Component Analysis, while Osipov et al.’s approach proposed a physics-based method. Both approaches approximate mass attenuation coefficients of materials as a linear combination of basis functions (eigen effects) or physics-based equations. A set of coefficients {a 1 , a 2 , a 3 } or {B, D} were found by parameter optimization in EXCEL Solver. The identification parameters, {$\frac{a_{2}}{a_{1}}$, $\frac{a_{3}}{a_{1}}$} or estimated effective atomic number $\hat{Z}$ from {B, D}, were calculated to identify material of an aluminum 8 step wedge and a steel 8 step wedge in X-ray radiography images taken by a DRCT system. Maitrejean et al.’s approach was unable to provide reliable $\frac{a_{3}}{a_{1}}$ ratio values for identification of materials. Osipov et al.’s approach was found to be more robust in identify materials with a semi-empirical formula derived from test results in this study.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

The Steel Equivalency Workbook: An X-Ray Transmission Calculator

The Steel Equivalency Spreadsheet was created as a robust, user-friendly method for the following: 1. Determining if it is possible to image an object. 2. Reducing time needed when selecting equipment and preparing for field imaging activities. 3. Reducing the amount of equipment taken for field imaging activities. 4. Determining a starting point for exposure settings prior to imaging an object. 5. Reducing the amount of dose deposited to complete an imaging operation (in the spirit of As Low As Reasonably Achievable, ALARA). The spreadsheet was developed using various physical models to account for different phenomena. Future implementations aim to expand beyond the Digital Radiography and Computed Tomography Single Munition Scanner (DRCT SMS) in standard configuration to include high energy XRGs (Betatrons) and sub-MeV pulsed XRGs (XRS4). Alternative computational methods that compensate for incoherent scattering when calculating relative transmission are also being pursued. Ultimately the spreadsheet exceeded the developmental goal of having less than 10% average error when comparing calculations to real-world images.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗