Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Thomas, J. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas, J. L..

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1987

Computational methods for unsteady transonic flows

Computational methods for unsteady transonic flows are surveyed with emphasis on prediction. Computational difficulty is discussed with respect to type of unsteady flow; attached, mixed (attached/separated) and separated. Significant early computations of shock motions, aileron buzz and periodic oscillations are discussed. The maturation of computational methods towards the capability of treating complete vehicles with reasonable computational resources is noted and a survey of recent comparisons with experimental results is compiled. The importance of mixed attached and separated flow modeling for aeroelastic analysis is discussed, and recent calculations of periodic aerodynamic oscillations for an 18 percent thick circular arc airfoil are given.

Edwards, John W.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Navier-Stokes computations of vortical flows over low aspect ratio wings

An upwind-biased finite-volume algorithm is applied to the low-speed flow over a low aspect ratio delta wing from zero to forty degrees angle of attack. The differencing is second-order accurate spatially, and a multigrid algorithm is used to promote convergence to the steady state. The results compare well with the detailed experiments of Hummel (1983) and others for a Re(L) of 0.95 x 10 to the 6th. The predicted maximum lift coefficient of 1.10 at thirty-five degrees angle of attack agrees closely with the measured maximum lift of 1.06 at thirty-three degrees. At forty degrees angle of attack, a bubble type of vortex breakdown is evident in the computations, extending from 0.6 of the root chord to just downstream of the trailing edge.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Euler and Navier-Stokes solutions for the leeside flow over delta wings at supersonic speeds

Distinctly different types of leeside flowfields over highly swept sharp leading edge delta wings in supersonic flow were numerically simulated using Euler and Navier-Stokes solvers. The Euler code was seen to be adequate only in predicting primary flow structures (leading edge vortex and cross flow shock) whereas the Navier-Stokes code was capable of predicting secondary flow structures (i.e., secondary vortex). A comparison of laminar and turbulent Navier-Stokes solutions indicated that the turbulent boundary layer model is more accurate in predicting the effect of the boundary layer model on the flowfield. Also, the Navier-Stokes code indicated detailed flow structures not observed in the qualitative experimental data available (i.e., vapor screen photographs) indicating a need for quantitative flow field data.

Mcmillin, S. N.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Navier-Stokes computations of prolate spheroids at angle of attack

Three-dimensional viscous flow calculations are made for a 6:1 prolate spheroid at conditions for which detailed experimental data are available. The computations are made with two finite-volume algorithms for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, one using central differencing for the convective and pressure terms and the other using an upwind-biased flux-difference-splitting approach. The effects of grid density and artificial dissipation on the accuracy of the numerical results are included. Generally good agreement of the computations with the experimental results is obtained over a range of Reynolds numbers and angles-of-attack, up to 30 deg, although the results at lower Reynolds numbers are sensitive to the assumed transition location.

Vatsa, V. N.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Upwind relaxation algorithms for Euler/Navier-Stokes equations

A description of and results from a solution algorithm for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations are presented. The main features of the algorithm are second or third order accurate upwind discretization of the convection and pressure derivatives and a relaxation scheme for the unfactored implicit backward Euler time method, implemented in a finite-volume formulation. Upwind methods were successfully used to obtain solutions to the Euler equations for flows with strong shock waves. The particular upwind method being used is based on the flux vector splitting technique developed by Van Leer and both second and third order accurate discretizations were developed. Currently, the most widely used implicit solution technique for the Navier-Stokes equations use approximate factorization (AF) methods to treat multidimensional problems. The time integration scheme being used in the present algorithm corresponds to a line Gauss-Seidel relaxation method. This method produces good convergence rates for steady-state flows, and most of the algorithm was vectorized on the NASA Langley VPS 32 computer. The Navier-Stokes algorithm was tested for several two-dimensional flow problems. Solutions for the problems gave excellent results. The presented effort is directed toward the extension of the scheme to the full three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Separated flow

A brief overview of flow separation phenomena is provided. Langley has many active research programs in flow separation related areas. Three cases are presented which describe specific examples of flow separation research. In each example, a description of the fundamental fluid physics and the complexity of the flow field is presented along with a method of either reducing or controlling the extent of separation. The following examples are discussed: flow over a smooth surface with an adverse pressure gradient; flow over a surface with a geometric discontinuity; and flow with shock-boundary layer interactions. These results will show that improvements are being made in the understanding of flow separation and its control.

Sellers, W. L., III↗
NASA NTRS1986

Computation of leading-edge vortex flows

The simulation of the leading edge vortex flow about a series of conical delta wings through solution of the Navier-Stokes and Euler equations is studied. The occurrence, the validity, and the usefulness of separated flow solutions to the Euler equations of particular interest. Central and upwind difference solutions to the governing equations are compared for a series of cross sectional shapes, including both rounded and sharp tip geometries. For the rounded leading edge and the flight condition considered, viscous solutions obtained with either central or upwind difference methods predict the classic structure of vortical flow over a highly swept delta wing. Predicted features include the primary vortex due to leading edge separation and the secondary vortex due to crossflow separation. Central difference solutions to the Euler equations show a marked sensitivity to grid refinement. On a coarse grid, the flow separates due to numerical error and a primary vortex which resembles that of the viscous solution is predicted. In contrast, the upwind difference solutions to the Euler equations predict attached flow even for first-order solutions on coarse grids. On a sufficiently fine grid, both methods agree closely and correctly predict a shock-curvature-induced inviscid separation near the leeward plane of symmetry. Upwind difference solutions to the Navier-Stokes and Euler equations are presented for two sharp leading edge geometries. The viscous solutions are quite similar to the rounded leading edge results with vortices of similar shape and size. The upwind Euler solutions predict attached flow with no separation for both geometries. However, with sufficient grid refinement near the tip or through the use of more accurate spatial differencing, leading edge separation results. Once the leading edge separation is established, the upwind solution agrees with recently published central difference solutions to the Euler equations.

Newsome, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Far-field boundary conditions for transonic lifting solutions to the Euler equations

Far-field boundary conditions for the Euler equations are formulated and applied to transonic lifting flow over an airfoil in an unbounded domain. An expansion of the linearized small-disturbance equation in the far field is developed and the leading-order term, corresponding to a point vortex representation for the airfoil, is retained. A comprehensive evaluation across the Mach number range of the procedure's effectiveness in eliminating dependence of the numerical results on the boundary extent is presented. Extension of the method to three dimensions is also outlined.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Navier-Stokes computations of lee-side flows over delta wings

Solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations for the flow over delta wings are computed with emphasis on the separated vortical flows developing on the lee side at high angles of attack. A recently developed implicit algorithm is used which employs upwind differencing for the pressure and convection terms and central differencing for the shear stress and heat transfer terms. Solutions to both the three-dimensional equations and the approximate conical flow equations are compared parametrically with an extensive experimental data base at supersonic speeds. The computations indicate that the conical flow approximation provides results in close agreement with the three-dimensional equations, even to angles of attack as high as 20 degrees. Good agreement with experimentally measured pressures and vapor screen photographs is obtained for the conditions investigated. The method predicts the classical pattern of vortical flow over a delta wing and transition to other flow patterns as the leading edge sweep angle and leading edge normal Mach number are varied.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Aspects and applications of patched grid calculations

Patched grid calculations within the framework of an implicit, flux-vector split upwind/relaxation algorithm for the Euler equations are presented. The effect of a metric-discontinuous interface on the convergence rate of the algorithm is discussed along with the spatial accuracy of the solution and the effect of curvature along an interface. Results are presented and discussed for the free-stream problem, shock reflection problem, supersonic inlet with a 5 degree ramp, aerodynamically choked inlet, and three-dimensional analytic forebody.

Walters, R. W.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Upwind Navier-Stokes solutions for separated periodic flows

The application of an upwind implicit approximate factorization Navier-Stokes algorithm to highly separated flow is described. Using both the thin-layer and complete forms of the Navier-Stokes equations, the low Reynolds number laminar flow around a circular cylinder with periodic shedding is solved. The effect of grid density, grid extent, and time step on the Strouhal number is shown. Results from both sets of equations agree within the experimental data band. Unsteady, laminar flow computations around inclined plates and separated airfoils are also described. Strouhal numbers agree to within 5 percent of experiments for inclined plates. Differences between the complete equations and the thin-layer approximation for separated periodic flows are discussed. Computations of an impulsively started circular cylinder and airfoil yield time-accurate flowfield shapes in good agreement with experimental flow visualizations. The turbulent computation of an airfoil at a high angle-of-attack is massively separated, but shows no evidence of periodicity.

Rumsey, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Multigrid acceleration of the flux split Euler equations

Multigrid acceleration is applied to a flux-split algorithm for solving the Euler equations in two and three dimensions. The basic algorithm is an implicit spatially-split approximate factorization method. The stability of the scheme in comparison to other factorization is examined. Results are presented for two-dimensional airfoil flows and three-dimensional wing flows which demonstrate substantially improved convergence with the multigrid algorithm. An asymptotic spectral radius of 0.89 and 0.93 is attained for a 97 x 17 x 17 wing solution at subcritical and supercritical conditions, respectively.

Anderson, W. K.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Implicit flux-split schemes for the Euler equations

Recent progress in the development of implicit algorithms for the Euler equations using the flux-vector splitting method is described. Comparisons of the relative efficiency of relaxation and spatially-split approximately factored methods on a vector processor for two-dimensional flows are made. For transonic flows, the higher convergence rate per iteration of the Gauss-Seidel relaxation algorithms, which are only partially vectorizable, is amply compensated for by the faster computational rate per iteration of the approximately factored algorithm. For supersonic flows, the fully-upwind line-relaxation method is more efficient since the numerical domain of dependence is more closely matched to the physical domain of dependence. A hybrid three-dimensional algorithm using relaxation in one coordinate direction and approximate factorization in the cross-flow plane is developed and applied to a forebody shape at supersonic speeds and a swept, tapered wing at transonic speeds.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1985

A comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations

A comparison is made between the computational results of the Steger-Warming (1981) and van Leer (1982) flux splitting methods, which have been applied in generalized coordinates to quasi-one-dimensional transonic flow in a nozzle and two-dimensional subsonic, transonic, and supersonic flow over airfoils. The latter splitting method leads to higher convergence rates and a sharper representation of shocks in the transition region. The second-order accurate, one-sided-difference model is extended to a third-order, upwind-biased model with only small additional computational effort.

Anderson, W. K.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Upwind relaxation algorithms for the Navier Stokes equations

The development of upwind relaxation algorithms for obtaining efficient steady-state solutions to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations is described. The method is second-order accurate spatially and naturally disipative, using third-order flux splitting of the pressure and convective terms and second-order central differencing for shear and heat flux terms. A line Gauss-Seidel relaxation approach, shown to be unconditionally stable for model convection and diffusion equations, is used. The algorithm is demonstrated for several flows using the thin-layer form of the equations, including the problem of shock-induced separation over a flat plate.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Integral boundary-layer models for turbulent separated flows

Two-dimensional, integral boundary-layer methods of the entrainment and dissipation type, with closure relationships which account for turbulent separated flows through the velocity and turbulence models, are developed. Kinematic shape factor relations used in the two methods are evaluated by comparison with recently obtained experimental data for separated flows. Prescribed-displacement-thickness computations are made with both methods and compared to experiment for a series of separated flows, including low speed and transonic shock-induced separation. Effects of upstream history on the turbulent shear stress development are shown to be important for the accurate prediction of the separated flows considered and the experimental trends are reasonably modeled by a rate equation derived from the turbulent kinetic energy equation.

Thomas, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Navier-Stokes calculations for the vortex of a rotor in hover

An efficient finite-difference scheme for the solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation is used to study the vortex wake of a rotor in hover. The solution Procedure uses a vorticity-stream function formulation and incorporates an asymptotic far-field boundary condition enabling the size of the computational domain to be reduced in comparison to other methods. The results from the present method are compared with experimental data obtained by smoke flow visualization and hot-wire measurements for several rotor blade configurations.

Liu, C. H.↗