Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Tanimoto, Rebekah

Publications and source records attributed to Tanimoto, Rebekah.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2015

Post-Flight Aerodynamic and Aerothermal Model Validation of a Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator

NASA's Low Density Supersonic Decelerator Program is developing new technologies that will enable the landing of heavier payloads in low density environments, such as Mars. A recent flight experiment conducted high above the Hawaiian Islands has demonstrated the performance of several decelerator technologies. In particular, the deployment of the Robotic class Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (SIAD-R) was highly successful, and valuable data were collected during the test flight. This paper outlines the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis used to estimate the aerodynamic and aerothermal characteristics of the SIAD-R. Pre-flight and post-flight predictions are compared with the flight data, and a very good agreement in aerodynamic force and moment coefficients is observed between the CFD solutions and the reconstructed flight data.

Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test↗
NASA NTRS2013

Fabrication Assembly and Test of the Mars Science Laboratory Descent Stage Propulsion System

The Descent Stage Propulsion System (DSPS) is the most challenging and complex propulsion system ever built at JPL. Performance requirements, such as the entry Reaction Control System (RCS) requirements, and the terminal descent requirements (3300 N maximum thrust and approximately 835,000 N-s total impulse in less than a minute), required a large amount of propellant and a large number of components for a spacecraft that had to fit in a 4.5 meter aeroshell. The size and shape of the aeroshell, along with the envelope of the stowed rover, limited the configuration options for the Descent Stage structure. The configuration and mass constraints of the Descent Stage structure, along with performance requirements, drove the configuration of the DSPS. This paper will examine some of the challenges encountered and solutions developed during the fabrication, assembly, and test of the DSPS.

Mars Science Laboratory (MSL)↗
NASA NTRS2010

Preliminary Characterization of the Altair Lunar Lander Slosh Dynamics and Some Implications for the Thrust Vector Control Design

This paper describes a conceptual design of the Thrust Vector Control (TVC) system and preliminary modeling of propellant slosh, for the Altair Lunar Lander. Altair is a vehicle element of the NASA Constellation Program aimed at returning humans to the moon. Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C) is the measurement and control of spacecraft position, velocity, and attitude in support of mission objectives. One key GN&C function is the commanding of effectors that control attitude and impart delta V on the vehicle, utilizing both reaction control system (RCS) thrusters and throttling and TVC gimbaling of the vehicle main engine. Both the Altair descent and ascent modules carry fuel tanks. During thrusting maneuvers, the sloshing of liquid fuels in partially filled tanks can interact with the controlled system in such a way as to cause the overall system to be unstable. These fuel tanks must be properly placed, relative to the spacecraft's c.m., to avoid any unstable interactions. Following this will be a discussion of propellant slosh modeling work performed for the present vehicle configuration, including slosh frequency and participatory fluid mass predictions. Knowing the range of slosh mode frequencies over mission phases, the TVC bandwidth must be carefully selected so as not to excite the slosh modes at those frequencies. The likely need to increase the damping factor of slosh modes via baffles will also be discussed. To conclude, a discussion of operations procedures aimed at minimizing TVC-slosh interactions will be given.

Lee, Allan Y.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Preliminary Characterizations of Altair Lunar Lander Slosh Dynamics and Some Implications for TVC Design

During thrust maneuvers, the sloshing of fuel in partially filled tanks could interact with the controlled system in such a way as to cause the overall system to be unstable. This failure mode could be a result of poor coordination between systems engineers of Structures, Propulsion, GN&C, Mission Operations, and other subsystems. Attentions to the following is a minimum: Placements of fuel tanks, Tank shapes and baffle designs, Separation of TVC BW from slosh mode frequencies, Adequacy of excursion range of engine gimbal actuators in all engine burns, BW of sensors (e.g., gyroscopes) and actuators (e.g., engine gimbal), Structural frequencies of spacecraft and engine mounts, Prediction of S/C's c.m. location, canting of gimbal null axis, others. Check overall TVC performance via validated simulation test bed. Modeling fuel slosh during spacecraft thrusting maneuvers • Placement of fuel tanks to guarantee stable interactions between fuel slosh mode and the S/C rigid-body mode • Estimation of slosh frequencies (as a function of mission phases): – Estimation of slosh mode damping • Some implications for Thrust Vector Control design: – Selection of TVC controller bandwidth – Adequacy of the excursion range of engine gimbal actuator • TVC system design: Complex Interactions between GN&C, Propulsion, Structure, and Other Subsystems

Thrust vector control↗