Engineering topics
Sunny, E.
Publications and source records attributed to Sunny, E..
Transition to Uranium-Based Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Options
An Evaluation and Screening (E and S) study of nuclear fuel cycle options was recently conducted for the U.S. Department of Energy to identify promising fuel cycle options with the potential for achieving substantial improvements compared to the current nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S. This study considered the entire fuel cycle, i.e., the complete nuclear energy system from mining to disposal including both once-through and recycle fuel cycles. The E and S study considered performance at steady-state when evaluating the potential benefits and challenges to achieving that eventual end state. Based on the steady-state findings from the E and S, a set of four fuel cycle options (FCOs) were identified as most promising, in terms of offering the most benefits compared to the current cycle. These FCOs have natural uranium (or existing stocks of uranium such as depleted uranium) as the makeup feed sent to the fast reactor (FR) fleet combined with two dimensions. The first dimension is whether the FR is a single-stage (produces just enough fuel resources to sustain operation and growth of the FR fleet) or a two-stage (produces additional fuel resources to also sustain a companion fleet of thermal reactors) fuel cycle. In all four cases, all of the uranium is continuously recycled. The second dimension is whether only the plutonium is co-extracted and recycled with the uranium (with minor actinides disposed as waste) or all transuranic elements are co-extracted and recycled. The four most promising options are: 1) single-stage FR recycling of U/Pu (EG23), 2) recycling of U/TRU in single-stage FR (EG24), 3) recycling of U/Pu in two-stage FR/thermal reactors (EG29), and 4) recycling of U/TRU in two-stage FR/thermal reactors (EG30). (authors)
EXPANDED ANALYSIS OF TRANSITION TO AN ALTERNATIVE FUEL CYCLE
Explore the source record for details and available documents.