Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Sung, Myung Kyun.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As AM lattices become more popular in medical devices, it is important to consider how lattice design parameters affect the mechanical integrity and performance of a device. This research investigated the effect of lattice orientation on the compressive mechanical response of five common lattice geometries: Hexagonal Honeycomb (Hex), Diamond, Voronoi Tessellation Method (VTM), sheet-based Gyroid, and Face-Centered-Cubic (FCC). Samples were tested at two relative densities and eight orientations, printed in Nylon 12 (PA2200) on an EOS P396. The mechanical response was compared to simulated finite element analysis (FEA) response for Hex and FCC lattices. Hex lattices displayed significant orientation dependance. Diamond lattices demonstrated some orientation dependance when at a lower relative density. Gyroid, FCC, and VTM all displayed minimal orientation dependance. Increasing lattice relative density appeared to reduce anisotropy among tested orientations of all lattice geometries except Hex. FEA simulations were able to produce a trend response that matched the mechanical response trends based on the investigated orientations. Furthermore, these results support the need for multi axial lattice mechanical test considerations. It also bolsters the need for lattice FEA models to have a sufficient comparator when identifying “worst-case” lattice test scenarios.
Topology Optimization (TO) determines a material distribution within a domain under given conditions and design constraints, and generally generates complex geometries as a result. Complementary to TO, Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers the ability to fabricate complex geometries which may be difficult to manufacture using traditional techniques such as milling. AM has been used in multiple industries including the medical devices area. Hence, TO may be used to create patient-matched devices where the mechanical response is catered to a particular patient. Furthermore, during a medical device regulatory 510(k) pathway, demonstrating that worst-cases are known and tested is critical to the review process. Using TO and AM to predict worst-case designs for subsequent performance testing may be challenging and does not appear to have been thoroughly explored. Investigating the effects of TO input parameters when AM is employed may be the first step in determining the feasibility of predicting these worst-cases.