Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Straub, Mark D.

Publications and source records attributed to Straub, Mark D..

Modeling Heterogeneity in UO 2 Nanoparticles Using X‐ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Abstract EXAFS provides the capability to interrogate nanoparticle (NP) structure in atomistic detail without relying on long‐range crystallinity. There is a limitation in that EXAFS provides averaged structural information, making it difficult to separate a small amount of heterogeneous structure from bulk. In this work, models were developed to extract surface‐specific information from conventional EXAFS measurements collected on UO 2 NPs of varying size. Specifically, the surface terminating species of UO 2 NPs was determined from comparison of coordination numbers with geometric models while the origin of static disorder was interrogated from user‐defined simulations. Results show that the degree of oxygenation on the NP surface does not significantly deviate from bulk surface and that static disorder is highly enhanced in NP surface layers but cannot be attributed to surface relaxation effects alone. The approach described herein has the potential to be adapted to a range of inorganic NP systems to interrogate surface structure.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

A Uranium(II) Arene Complex That Acts as a Uranium(I) Synthon

We report two-electron reduction of the amidate-supported U(III) mono(arene) complex U(TDA) 3 (2) with KC 8 yields the anionic bis(arene) complex [K[2.2.2]cryptand][U(TDA) 2 ] (3) (TDA = N-(2,6-di-isopropylphenyl)pivalamido). EPR spectroscopy, magnetic susceptibility measurements, and calculations using DFT as well as multireference CASSCF methods all provide strong evidence that the electronic structure of 3 is best represented as a 5f 4 U(II) metal center bound to a monoreduced arene ligand. Reactivity studies show 3 reacts as a U(I) synthon by behaving as a two-electron reductant toward I 2 to form the dinuclear U(III)–U(III) triiodide species [K[2.2.2]cryptand][(UI(TDA) 2 ) 2 (μ-I)] (6) and as a three-electron reductant toward cycloheptatriene (CHT) to form the U(IV) complex [K[2.2.2]cryptand][U(η 7 -C 7 H 7 )(TDA) 2 (THF)] (7). The reaction of 3 with cyclooctatetraene (COT) generates a mixture of the U(III) anion [K[2.2.2]cryptand][U(TDA) 4 ] (1-crypt) and U(COT) 2 , while the addition of COT to complex 2 instead yields the dinuclear U(IV)–U(IV) inverse sandwich complex [U(TDA) 3 ] 2 (μ-η 8 :η 3 -C 8 H 8 ) (8). Two-electron reduction of the homoleptic Th(IV) amidate complex Th(TDA) 4 (4) with KC 8 gives the mono(arene) complex [K[2.2.2]cryptand][Th(TDA) 3 (THF)] (5). The C–C bond lengths and torsion angles in the bound arene of 5 suggest a direduced arene bound to a Th(IV) metal center; this conclusion is supported by DFT calculations.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Thorium amidates function as single-source molecular precursors for thorium dioxide

Here, we report the synthesis of four homoleptic thorium(IV) amidate complexes as single-source molecular precursors for thorium dioxide. Each can be sublimed at atmospheric pressure, with the substituents on the amidate ligands significantly impacting their volatility and thermal stability. These complexes decompose via alkene elimination to give ThO 2 without need for a secondary oxygen source. ThO 2 samples formed from pyrolysis of C-alkyl amidates were found to have higher purity and crystallinity than ThO 2 samples formed from C-aryl amidates.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Amidinate Supporting Ligands Influence Molecularity in Formation of Uranium Nitrides

Uranium nitride complexes are attractive targets for chemists as molecular models for the bonding, reactivity, and magnetic properties of next-generation nuclear fuels, but these molecules are uncommon and can be difficult to isolate due to their high reactivity. Here, we describe the synthesis of three new multinuclear uranium nitride complexes, [U(BCMA) 2 ] 2 (μ-N)(μ-κ 1 :κ 1 -BCMA) (7), [(U(BIMA) 2 ) 2 (μ-N)(μ-N i Pr)(K 2 (μ-η 3 :η 3 -CH 2 CHN i Pr)] 2 (8), and [U(BIMA) 2 ] 2 (μ-N)(μ-κ 1 :κ 1 -BIMA) (9) (BCMA = N,N-bis(cyclohexyl)methylamidinate, BIMA = N,N-bis(iso-propyl)methylamidinate), from U(III) and U(IV) amidinate precursors. By varying the amidinate ligand substituents and azide source, we were able to influence the composition and size of these nitride complexes. 15 N isotopic labeling experiments confirmed the bridging nitride moieties in 7–9 were formed via two-electron reduction of azide. The tetra-uranium cluster 8 was isolated in 99% yield via reductive cleavage of the amidinate ligands; this unusual molecule contains nitrogen-based ligands with formal 1–, 2–, and 3– charges. Additionally, chemical oxidation of the U(IV) precursor U(N 3 )(BCMA) 3 yielded the cationic U(V) species [U(N 3 )(BCMA) 3 ][OTf]. Magnetic susceptibility measurements confirmed a U(IV) oxidation state for the uranium centers in the three nitride-bridged complexes and provided a comparison of magnetic behavior in the structurally related U(III)-U(IV)-U(V) series U(BCMA) 3 , U(N 3 )(BCMA) 3 , and [U(N 3 )(BCMA) 3 ][OTf]. At 240 K, the magnetic moments in this series decreased with increasing oxidation state, i.e., U(III) > U(IV) > U(V); this trend follows the decreasing number of 5f valence electrons along this series.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Recent Advances in Nuclear Forensic Chemistry

Nuclear forensics is a rapidly growing field with a widespread impact on global nonproliferation. From the beginning, nuclear forensic capabilities have been inextricably bound to existing limitations within chemistry and materials science. As nuclear forensics has continued to develop as a unique field of research, new advances in chemistry have revolutionized our ability to rapidly and quantitatively analyze radioactive materials for attribution. In particular, microanalytical techniques originally developed for nanoscience, such as micro-XRF, SIMS, and SEM-EDX, have enabled spatially resolved chemical analyses to be performed with only nanograms of material. Such techniques have redefined the paradigm for pre- and postdetonation nuclear forensics, as large quantities of material are no longer necessary for full characterization and attribution. This Review explains how modern nuclear forensic techniques have developed from their origins in chemistry and provides real-world examples of how these techniques have been used to characterize radioactive materials, including fallout from nuclear detonations such as the 1945 Trinity test.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗