Song, Duo — Page 2 | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2020

Role of the Solvent–Surfactant Duality of Ionic Liquids in Directing Two-Dimensional Particle Assembly

Nanoparticle self-assembly plays a key role in formation of superlattices, which exhibit remarkable physical and chemical properties. However, controlling assembly remains a challenge partly due to a lack of understanding of the assembly dynamics and the difficulty in linking interfacial solution properties to interparticle forces. In this study, using liquid-cell transmission electron microscopy, self-assembly of gold nanoparticles (NPs) into superlattices in mixtures of water and ionic liquid (IL) was visualized, revealing a dual role of the IL in the assembly process. At intermediate concentrations, the IL acts as a surfactant stabilizing the particles at a well-defined equilibrium separation corresponding to the length of hydrogen bonded IL cations adsorbed onto neighboring NPs. Analysis of the interparticle forces reveals attractive long-range interactions of a van der Waals nature. At separations of 1-3 nm, interactions are dominated by attractive ion correlation and repulsive hydration forces giving rise to an energy minimum at 1.5 nm separation. The superlattice is further stabilized by hydrogen bonding, which shifts the equilibrium interparticle distance to 1.1 nm. In contrast, at higher concentrations, IL accumulates and forms a structured network in the gap between nanoparticles, where it acts as a solvent that eliminates the repulsive barrier and thus promotes particle coalescence. This solvent-surfactant duality of IL opens new opportunities for their use in directing particle assembly.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2020

Electron transfer calculations between edge sharing octahedra in hematite, goethite, and annite

A key reaction underlying the charge transport in iron containing oxides, clays, micas is the Fe$^{2+}$-Fe$^{3+}$ exchange reaction between edge-sharing iron octahedra. These reactions facilitate conduction in these minerals by the thermally-activated hopping of small polarons across the lattice. Depending on the mineral and local charge state the small polaron can either encase an electron or hole. The probability for conduction of small polarons depends strongly on the height and adiabicity of the reaction barrier, with larger and more diabatic barriers yielding slow conduction associated with either weak coupling or a large prerequisite rearrangement of the lattice during charge transport. To model these reactions, a first principle electron transfer (ET) method was developed to model the small polaron hopping between the edge-sharing octahedra sites in hematite ($e^{-}$ polaron), goethite ($e^{-}$ polaron), and annite ($h^{+}$ polaron) bulk structures. The ET method is based on electronic structure methods (i.e., plane-wave Density Functional Theory) capable of performing calculations with periodic cells and large size systems efficiently while at the same time being accurate enough to be used in the estimation of the electron-transfer coupling matrix element, $V_{AB}$, and the electron transfer transmission factor, $\kappa_{el}$. Additionally, the calculations confirmed the existence of small polarons in all three minerals, and the reactions were predicted to be strongly adiabatic. It was found that transfer of a hole in the octahedral layer of annite had an adiabatic barrier of $0.311$ eV, and the transfer of an extra electron in hematite and goethite had adiabatic barriers of $0.242$ eV and $0.232$ eV respectively. The electronic coupling parameters,$V_{AB}$, were found to be $0.188$ eV, $0.196$ eV, and $0.102$ eV respectively for hematite, goethite, and annite. While similar bonding topologies pertain, the underlying basis for the differences is the subtle differences in local structures.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗