Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Smith, Ronald C.

Publications and source records attributed to Smith, Ronald C..

Wind tunnel balance

A flow-through balance is provided which includes a non-metric portion and a metric portion which form a fluid-conducting passage in fluid communication with an internal bore in the sting. The non-metric and metric portions of the balance are integrally connected together by a plurality of flexure beams such that the non-metric portion, the metric portion and the flexure beams form a one-piece construction which eliminates mechanical hysteresis between the non-metric and the metric portion. The system includes structures for preventing the effects of temperature, pressure and pressurized fluid from producing asymmetric loads on the flexure beams. A temperature sensor and a pressure sensor are located within the fluid-conducting passage of the balance. The system includes a longitudinal bellows member connected at two ends to one of the non-metric portion and the metric portion and at an intermediate portion thereof to the other of (1) and (2). A plurality of strain gages are mounted on the flexure beams to measure strain forces on the flexure beams. The flexure beams are disposed so as to enable symmetric forces on the flexure beams to cancel out so that only asymmetric forces are measured as deviations by the strain gages.

Horne, Warren L.↗

Summary of studies to reduce wing-mounted propfan installation drag on an M = 0.8 transport

Powerplant installation losses for an advanced, high-speed, turboprop transport have been investigated in the Ames Research Center Transonic Wind Tunnels as a part of the NASA Advanced Turboprop Program (ATP). Force and pressure tests have been completed at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 0.82 on baseline and modified powered-model configurations to determine the magnitude of the losses and to what extent current design tools could be used to optimize the installed performance of turboprop propulsion systems designed to cruise at M = 0.8. Results of the tests indicate a large reduction in installed drag for the modified configuration. The wing-mounted power plant caused destabilizing pitching moments and a negative shift in the zero-lift pitching moment.

Smith, Ronald C.↗

Installation aerodynamics of wing-mounted, single-rotation propfans

The installation of advanced (M = 0.8) turboprop propulsion systems on transport aircraft represents a challenging task to design engineers. The installation aerodynamics of wing-mounted, single-rotation, tractor turboprop systems have been extensively investigated by NASA Ames using a large powered semispan wind tunnel model. Two configurations have been studied: a straight under-the-wing (UTW) nacelle and a contoured over-the-wing (OTW) configuration. The installation characteristics of these two configurations are presented in terms of installed drag, wing pressure distributions, and surface oil flows. Through the use of wing leading-edge modifications, the installed drag of the UTW nacelle was reduced to less than isolated nacelle drag at the cruise condition of M = 0.8 with a wing C(L) of 0.5. At this condition, the favorable interference is attributed to the recovery of a portion of the swirl in the slipstream generated by the single rotation propeller. The OTW installation represented a much more difficult task. For the configuration tested, the installed drag was unacceptably high and demonstrated the sensitive nature of installing a nacelle/slipstream combination in the transonic flow regime.

Bencze, Daniel P.↗

Test results at transonic speeds on a contoured over-the-wing propfan model

A semispan wing/body model with a powered highly loaded propeller has been tested to provide data on the propulsion installation drag of advanced propfan-powered aircraft. The model had a supercritical wing with a contoured over-the-wing nacelle. It was tested in the Ames Research Center's (ARC) 14-foot Transonic Wind Tunnel at a total pressure of 1 atm. The test was conducted at angles of attack from -0.5 to 4 deg at Mach numbers ranging from 0.6 to 0.8. The test objectives were to determine propeller performance, exhaust jet effects, propeller slipstream interference drag, and total powerplant installation drag. Test results indicated a total powerplant installation drag of 82 counts (0.0082) at a Mach number of 0.8 and a lift coefficient of 0.5, which is approximately 29 percent of a typical airplane cruise drag.

Levin, Alan D.↗

Aerodynamic and propeller performance characteristics of a propfan-powered, semispan model

A semispan wing/body model with a powered propeller was tested to provide data on a total powerplant installation drag penalty of advanced propfan-powered aircraft. The test objectives were to determine the total power plant installation drag penalty on a representative propfan aircraft; to study the effect of configuration modifications on the installed powerplant drag; and to determine performance characteristics of an advanced design propeller which was mounted on a representative nacelle in the presence of a wing.

Levin, Alan D.↗

The Transonic Multifoil Augmentor Wing

The paper describes the development of a thick (t/c = 0.18) transonic, multifoil, blown augmentor-wing section and discusses the results of a series of wind-tunnel tests on the configuration. The results show that the blown multifoil section enjoys two advantages over a conventional unblown single-foil supercritical section or the same overall thickness-chord ratio: 1) "effective" drag reduced by blowing, and 2) increased drag rise Mach number (M(sub D) = 0.75); they also demonstrate that augmentor blowing improves the buffet boundaries of the section. Thus, overall, it has been shown that the augmentor flap configuration is capable of extending the speed range of a jet transport aircraft to the very low approach speeds required by STOL aircraft [as demonstrated by the NASA/DITC (Canadian Department of Industry Trade and Commerce) augmentor-wing STOL research aircraft] and also to the high subsonic speed required for cruise, where it is shown to be competitive with the plain supercritical airfoil.

Smith, Ronald C.↗