Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Seiji Kato

Publications and source records attributed to Seiji Kato.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Using Dual-Regression to Produce 16-Day Average AIRS Soundings

Temperature and humidity profiles are needed to estimate surface radiation budget. The Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) team uses temperature and humidity profiles from a reanalysis product produced by NASA’s Global Modeling and Assimilation Office for surface irradiance computations. Biases and drifts in temperature and humidity profiles in the reanalysis product result in biases and drifts in surface irradiances computed with them. One approach to correct biases and drifts in temperature and humidity profile is to use satellite observations, similar to assimilating instantaneous spectral radiances to correct modeled temperature and humidity profiles. In this work, we use mean spectral radiances to test the possibility of understanding biases in reanalysis mean temperature and humidity profiles. Specifically, we use 16-day mean Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) radiances and only use clear-sky spectral radiances with a viewing zenith angle nadir to near-nadir. We use the dual-regression method (Smith et al. 2012) to test whether temperature and humidity profiles retrieved from the 16-day mean spectral radiances agree with the average of temperature and humidity profiles derived from instantaneous spectral radiances. When daytime and nighttime spectral radiances are averaged separately and daytime and nighttime retrievals are performed separately, temperature and humidity profiles derived from the mean spectral radiances agree well with mean temperature and humidity profiles derived from instantaneous spectral radiances. The agreement improves when clouds are further screened to compute 16-day mean clear-sky spectral radiances.

Anthony DiNorscia↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Regional Water and Energy Balance in Contemporary Reanalyses

Regional to continental water and energy balance in reanalyses provide crucial information on the climate and climate variations in that region and can contrast other regions. Reanalyses are a valuable tool in piecing together the complete balance owing to the incorporation of the budgets in the background model and the assimilation of observation. On the other hand, the background model has its own biases and observational assimilation can lead to non-negligible tendencies within the budgets, and these can vary over space and time. Here, we will compare the balance within several reanalyses and how they have evolved over recent decades. Several observational data products will provide reference points in the comparison. In addition, a recent project has integrated observations of the water and energy budgets in an optimization that aims to reduce the imbalance of regional budgets in using observational terms from disparate sources. In evaluating the regional balances, we will incorporate, when available, the water and energy convergence terms as well as their analysis increments (which may be diagnosed as residuals). The reanalyses considered here include: Japanese Reanalyses for Three Quarters Century (JRA3Q), ECMWF Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5), Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) and the NCEP Reanalysis II (NCEPR2). NCEPR2 is representative of the late 90s technology, while the others represent the contemporary climate reanalyses presently available. We will discuss the regional balances over key river basins (e.g. Mississippi and Amazon), and a range of continents including those well observed (North America and Europe) and those with fewer consistent observations (e.g. Africa). These contrasting regions show the degree of advancement in reanalyses and expose areas in need of improvement. The results also demonstrate the usefulness of producing complete atmospheric water and energy budgets as part of the diagnostic output.

Michael G Bosilovich↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Uncertainties in an Observation-Based Estimate of the Global Aerosol Direct Radiative Effect

Aerosols impact Earth’s radiation budget directly through interactions with radiation and indirectly via interactions with clouds. Aerosols have significant radiative impacts on Earth’s energy budget and represent the largest uncertainty in the radiative forcing of the current climate. Although the magnitude of the aerosol direct radiative effect (DRE) is estimated to be less than that of the indirect effect, uncertainties are large. While model-based estimates of aerosol radiative forcing are subject to uncertainties in modeled aerosol properties and uncertainties in simulated cloud cover and albedo, most observation-based studies of global aerosol DRE have their own difficulties with aerosol optical properties and have been limited to cloud-free skies in most cases. Estimates of the uncertainty of the aerosol DRE are themselves uncertain and have varied widely among different published studies. In this study we use the CERES-CALIPSO-CloudSat-MODIS (C3M) product to estimate the global clear-sky and all-sky aerosol DRE. C3M merges collocated data from CERES, CALIPSO, CloudSat, and MODIS with information from reanalysis and an aerosol transport model. With CALIOP observations of aerosol below optically thin clouds and above clouds, co-located with cloud albedo from MODIS, the C3M dataset allows a detailed exploration of observational uncertainties. By perturbing the aerosol properties used and comparing radiative effects in perturbed cases with the base case we characterize uncertainties in estimated aerosol DRE due to uncertainties in the aerosol properties involved. The results also provide a basis for determining measurement requirements to improve the accuracy of DRE estimates. We will describe the approach and present results.

Dave Winker↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Regional Water and Energy Balance in Contemporary Reanalyses

Regional to continental water and energy balance in reanalyses provide crucial information on the climate and climate variations in that region and can contrast other regions. Reanalyses are a valuable tool in piecing together the complete balance owing to the incorporation of the budgets in the background model and the assimilation of observation. On the other hand, the background model has its own biases and observational assimilation can lead to non-negligible tendencies within the budgets, and these can vary over space and time. Here, we will compare the balance within several reanalyses and how they have evolved over recent decades. Several observational data products will provide reference points in the comparison. In addition, a recent project has integrated observations of the water and energy budgets in an optimization that aims to reduce the imbalance of regional budgets in using observational terms from disparate sources. In evaluating the regional balances, we will incorporate, when available, the water and energy convergence terms as well as their analysis increments (which may be diagnosed as residuals). The reanalyses considered here include: Japanese Reanalyses for Three Quarters Century (JRA3Q), ECMWF Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5), Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) and the NCEP Reanalysis II (NCEPR2). NCEPR2 is representative of the late 90s technology, while the others represent the contemporary climate reanalyses presently available. We will discuss the regional balances over key river basins (e.g. Mississippi and Amazon), and a range of continents including those well observed (North America and Europe) and those with fewer consistent observations (e.g. Africa). These contrasting regions show the degree of advancement in reanalyses and expose areas in need of improvement. The results also demonstrate the usefulness of producing complete atmospheric water and energy budgets as part of the diagnostic output.

Michael Bosilovich↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Water and Energy Cycles in Contemporary Atmospheric Reanalyses in US Basins

Global atmospheric reanalyses have become an important tool for climate studies, owing to the inclusion of observation driven model quantities that are not easily observed, if at all. This includes the study of regional water and energy budgets, despite the fact that the physical terms of the budgets do not balance, owing in large part to the influence of assimilated observations. Here, we focus on the regional water and energy budgets for key river basins in the US, related to the Humans and Hydroclimate in the US (H2US, a Global Energy and Watercycle EXchanges, GEWEX, regional hydroclimate project). Regional budgets and their residuals (related to the assimilated observations) from contemporary reanalyses will be evaluated and intercompared to assess the improvements over previous reanalyses and identify their strengths and weaknesses as contributions to H2US. When available, the observational analysis increments will be quantified directly, and as residuals when that information is missing. Early results show improvements over the Mississippi River basin water cycle closure, and reduced analysis increments. However, the energy analysis increments show non negligible seasonality. Results for the Colorado River basin and National Climate Assessment (NCA) regions will also be presented. The results will emphasize the need for reanalyses and models to produce complete budget equation terms.

Michael Bosilovich↗