Engineering topics

Scott Jonathan Wood

Publications and source records attributed to Scott Jonathan Wood.

9 records

NASA NTRS2024

Multidisciplinary Analytics, Visualization, and Reporting Interface for Integrated Countermeasures

Exploration class missions will have communication latency requiring crew members to make decisions more autonomously, with less support from ground personnel. Therefore, new software is needed to provide crew the ability to not only visualize their countermeasures data, but to also derive comprehensive, nuanced, and multidisciplinary insights regarding the health and performance informatics throughout a mission. The Multidisciplinary Analytics, Visualization, and Reporting Interface for Integrated Countermeasures (MAVRIIC) software seeks to establish a centralized approach to countermeasure data visualization that will facilitate a more holistic understanding of crew members' well-being and performance and enable the development of informed and autonomous decision-making support systems aligned with the evolving requirements of Exploration missions. The culmination of MAVRIIC phase 1 (end of FY23) marked the release of a full-stack, cloud-based ground tool displaying visualizations of in-flight exercise data, exercise ground testing, and exercise MEDB reports. Phase 2 of MAVRIIC (FY24) focuses on beginning the expansion of data contents to domains outside of exercise, including functional fitness, sensorimotor, food/nutrition, radiation, bone, and cardio/vision. Phase 3 and phase 4 will comprise enhanced analytics integration and initiation of flight tool development for infusion into the Artemis Program and eventually the Mars Transit Habitat.

Kent Lawrence Kalogera↗

NASA NTRS2023

Augmented Reality Tool for Operationally Relevant 3D Sensorimotor Assessments

This project will leverage existing capabilities of an augmented reality (AR) sensorimotor assessment tool. Currently, the tool mimics the capabilities of validated 2-dimensional (2D) assessments. While this modality is well-aligned with seated interactions with flight-deck displays, extravehicular activity (EVA) tasks will require full body mobility wherein astronauts reach and bend in a 3-dimensional (3D) space. These types of motions, naturally including head movements, are known to elicit experiences of disorientation. Thus, sensorimotor assessments that include these stimulations and larger movements are important for understanding astronaut readiness prior to initial EVAs. The proposed effort will extend the current 2D eye-hand coordination task in AR to a 3D task designed to evaluate dynamic balance and eye-hand-body coordination. The new module will extend the range of motion and interaction space such that it better aligns with operational task needs for astronaut readiness evaluation.

Sarah Catherine Moudy↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Preliminary Results Using Galvanic Vestibular Reduction as a Non-Pharmaceutical Tool for Motion Sickness Mitigation

Alterations in vestibular sensory processing following G-transitions lead to motion sickness and spatial disorientation upon return to Earth’s gravity. The use of non-pharmaceutical mitigation for motion sickness has several potential advantages over drug treatment options. The purpose of this study was to validate a non-pharmaceutical tool using galvanic vestibular reduction (GVR) to mitigate G-transitional induced motion sickness and spatial disorientation.

G N Pradhan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Field Assessment of Sensorimotor Function Following Long-Duration Spaceflight

INTRODUCTION: Field assessments of functional task performance following long duration spaceflight are critical to characterize the risk associated with sensorimotor adaptation. A portable test battery involving sit-to-stand, prone-to-stand, walk and turn with obstacle, and tandem walking has been implemented during pre- and postflight testing to provide Sensorimotor Standard Measures that could be implemented in remote test locations. METHODS: To date, 19 astronauts (12 males, 7 females) participated in this study before and after 6–8-month expeditions to the International Space Station (198 ± 70 days, mean ±std). Ethics approvals were obtained, and all subjects provided informed consent. Tests were conducted preflight, within a few hours after landing, and then 1 day and 6–11 days later. Time to stability was the outcome measure for both standing tasks, time to completion and turn rate for the walk and turn task, and percent complete steps for the tandem walking (eyes open and closed). Statistical analyses included mixed effects (multi-level) generalized linear models. RESULTS: Consistent with previous Field Tests, significant effects of spaceflight were observed during the initial testing including longer times to stabilize posture when standing, longer times to complete the short obstacle walk, and fewer correct steps during tandem walking. The recovery timeline varied with task complexity, generally taking longer when either the basis of support was limited (e.g., tandem walk) and/or visual cues were deprived (eyes closed). DISCUSSION: These data suggest that additional sensorimotor-based countermeasures may be necessary to maintain functional performance during long-duration spaceflight. Maintaining core measures as new countermeasures are implemented during future missions will be instrumental in assessing their efficacy. This test battery will also serve as the basis for developing sensorimotor assessments during future space exploration.

Scott Jonathan Wood↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Head-Trunk Coordination Measures for Monitoring Postflight Sensorimotor Readaptation Strategies

During exploration missions, individual health assessments will be required to account for variability in neurosensory adaptation and task readiness for the initial extravehicular activities (EVAs). Previous research has identified postflight vestibular alterations and disruptions in head-trunk coordination after both short and long duration spaceflight missions. Astronauts were found to minimize head angular displacement and utilize a consistent forward head tilt theorized as a compensatory approach to stabilize the cephalic system and reduce motion sickness during readaptation to Earth’s gravity. Further, anecdotal self-reports from Shuttle crewmembers stated that pitch and side-to-side head movements immediately post-landing typically resulted in perceived angular self-motion. Notable disruptions also occur upon arrival in orbit, with astronauts choosing waist rotation rather than head movements during dynamic tasks. It is thought that the underlying sensorimotor disruptions may contribute to motion sickness in space and upon landing, postflight gait dysfunction, and inaccurate spatial orientation when performing daily tasks. To better characterize microgravity-induced sensorimotor adaptations, it is important to develop measures and monitoring tools that have high sensitivity in detecting changes in head-trunk coordination.

H M Weiss↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterizing the Risk: Review of Sensorimotor Evidence and Research Roadmap

BACKGROUND: NASA’s Artemis program will take astronauts back to the lunar surface for the first time in almost 50 years. Despite the successes of the previous Apollo program, the Artemis missions will differ in duration, vehicle characteristics, and landing tasks that may exacerbate the risks to crew health/safety and mission objectives. NASA’s Human Research Program identifies the risk of altered sensorimotor/vestibular function impacting critical mission tasks as one of the top priority risks to lunar exploration missions. This session will review the existing evidence and remaining gaps in knowledge for the sensorimotor risk. DESCRIPTION: Alterations in sensorimotor processing during spaceflight can lead to motion sickness, spatial disorientation, and decrements in postural control, locomotion, and fine motor control during and following gravity-transitions. The risk of impairment is greatest during and soon after gravity-transitions, when performance decrements may have high operational impacts (e.g., manual landings, immediate egress following landing, and early extravehicular activities (EVAs)). Recent studies have specifically improved the risk characterization of changes in perception, motion sickness, postural and locomotor control, manual control, and fine-motor coordination. However, given the difficulty in obtaining measurements during and soon after gravity-transitions, evidence for initial decrements immediately following gravity-transitions remains limited. The most significant gaps in the risk include manual control ability around gravity-transitions, the incidence and severity of motion sickness during landings, and the ability to perform egress/EVAs soon after gravity-transition. To address these gaps, current research roadmaps leverage both spaceflight studies and ground-based analogs for risk characterization and countermeasure development/validation. DISCUSSION: This panel will further describe the current sensorimotor research strategies with an emphasis on the operational scenarios of manual control, crew egress, and EVA. The goal of this research is to accommodate the needs of the crew and facilitate human capabilities to ensure lunar mission success. This work will prepare NASA for successful Artemis missions and enable the next giant leap, the exploration of Mars.

Timothy Ryan Macaulay↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploration Exercise System (EES) Development

Exploration class missions will be required to have an exercise device that is lightweight, has a small footprint, and is capable of providing enough physical stimulus and exercise variability to be an effective countermeasure against muscle and bone loss that results from the microgravity environment. Exploration exercise device prototypes should be evaluated on the ground and in-orbit for feasibility of use in microgravity for long and short duration exploration missions and efficacy of the device to maintain multi-system health and performance. The European Enhanced Exploration Exercise Device (E4D) was selected as the exploration prototype device to be evaluated on ISS for efficacy and feasibility of use as a single multi-modality device for the exercise system for exploration missions. This effort supports the continued development, testing, and verification of E4D hardware and software, internal NASA integration (Human Health and Performance, ISS Vehicle Office, Engineering, and Flight Operations), and external integration across NASA, ESA, and the Danish Aerospace Company (DAC). Providing a feasibility and acceptability assessment from a physiological efficacy and hardware durability standpoint are critical for informing use and risk associated with use on exploration missions. Clearly defined objectives from end users, stakeholders, and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) will be tested by crewmembers during acute use sessions and long duration use of the exercise device while on ISS. This effort will include a flight study where crewmembers will be asked to exercise using only the E4D during the duration of their mission and participate in a battery of physiological testing to evaluate the efficacy. Hardware is scheduled to launch in FY25 followed by 2 years of operational use after activation and checkout. A final recommendation will be provided to the Artemis program on acceptability of the device for exploration missions. The E4D needs a vibration isolation stabilization (VIS) system that serves as a platform for the exercise hardware to protect the vehicle from loads imparted during exercise. Exploration forward VIS systems will need to protect the vehicle and provide sufficient stabilization for the exerciser during performance of all critical exercises. These enabling capabilities need to be achieved within exploration vehicle power, thermal, mass, and volume limitations.

Kent Lawrence Kalogera↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploration Exercise System (EES) Physiology

Exploration class missions will be required to have an exercise device that is lightweight, has a small footprint, and is capable of providing enough physical stimulus and exercise variability to be an effective countermeasure against muscle, bone, aerobic fitness, and sensorimotor loss that results from the microgravity environment. Ground studies, inflight studies, and results analyses are required to inform Moon2Mars Design Reference Missions (DRMs) and vehicle designs. This activity encompasses two related projects, an evaluation study called Zero T2 and a requirements development for an exploration treadmill (ET). Exploration class missions’ mass/power/volume restrictions have resulted in the development of exercise devices that are motorized and flywheel-based to provide both aerobic and resistive training on one platform. These devices provide a variety of full body resistance exercise options as well as rowing and cycling for aerobic exercise, but do not provide ambulatory exercise via a treadmill. Because a treadmill has been available for use on the ISS since 2001, we do not understand the efficacy of exploration exercise modalities on muscle performance, aerobic fitness, bone health, or sensorimotor performance. A retrospective study was performed to quantify the association between total exercise (including specific contributions of treadmill exercise) and functional performance upon landing. Due to the relatively small variation in treadmill usage inflight, there is a need to do a controlled study where inflight crewmembers will not use the ISS treadmill (called T2) for the duration of their flights. There will be 3 arms to the Zero T2 study: 1) participants use all currently available exercise platforms aboard ISS (control group), 2) participants use only ARED and CEVIS, and 3) participants use only European Enhanced Exploration Device (E4D). (Please see the TechPort Entry for Exploration Exercise System Development for further detail on the E4D.) This study started in Oct 2020 and will continue through Sep 2027. In a parallel effort, a team will be developing requirements for an exploration treadmill. This project will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 will develop and implement energy prediction models based on available in-flight exercise data to quantify energy expenditure during 0g treadmill running. Phase 2 will then use the available biomechanical and metabolic evidence from Phase 1 to determine the hardware specification requirements essential to providing the desired exercise stimulus. Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) will then leverage the Standardized Process for Evaluating Exercise Devices (SPEED) developed by the team to 1) assess available technologies for candidate treadmills which meet defined requirements, 2) perform hands-on evaluations of top candidates, 3) provide evaluation outcomes and recommendations to developers. This project will begin in 2025 and continue through Sep 2030.

Kent Lawrence Kalogera↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Sensorimotor Countermeasures

Exploration class missions will include multiple transitions between gravitational environments, sometimes after long periods in microgravity, which will impact the neurovestibular system and sensorimotor capabilities. New countermeasures and assessment tools are needed to enhance preflight disorientation training, maintain inflight physical performance, and accelerate recovery following transitions between gravity environments so that crew are enabled to perform critical exploration mission tasks. The Sensorimotor Countermeasures capability area encompasses three projects. 1) The Upright Proprioception Retention via Inflight Training and Evaluation (UPRITE) system is being developed as an in-flight countermeasure that will mitigate the degradation of balance control mechanisms, which will improve post-flight postural stability. The development of such a countermeasure is not simply a matter of adapting a ground-based training program for spaceflight. The way that we control balance in a gravitational environment cannot be duplicated in 0g. Therefore, the UPRITE system challenges proprioception and tactile function using a 0g configuration. The steps to develop the countermeasure have been broken into seven phases: training type, controllable board factors, protocol development, 0g hardware test, training efficacy, ISS hardware demonstration, and countermeasure verification. 2) Unobtrusive Monitoring Tools and Operational Assessments (aka Head/Body Assessments) are being developed to quantify crew member sensorimotor adaptation following gravitational transitions. Three areas are needed in this development 1) explore, develop, and validate unobtrusive monitoring tools, 2) define sensorimotor performance metrics, and 3) explore capabilities to enhance sensorimotor assessment tasks for operational use and validate assessment tasks via high-fidelity analogs. 3) The Spatial Disorientation Trainer is being developed as a portable training capability to simulate the performance of landing and recovery type tasks while experiencing vertigo due to post-flight vestibular alterations. These simulations can be used 1) across research studies investigating the impacts of vestibular disruption on operational performance/assessments, 2) to train astronauts for upcoming spaceflight missions, and 3) to educate space medicine and operational personnel prior to providing post-flight support.

Scott Jonathan Wood↗