Scherer, Wolfgang | Engineering Papers

DOE OSTI2022

Experimental X-ray Charge-Density Studies–A Suitable Probe for Superconductivity? A Case Study on MgB 2

Case studies of 1T-TiSe 2 and YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7-δ have demonstrated that X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies can be used to trace even subtle structural phase transitions which are inherently connected with the onset of superconductivity in these benchmark systems. However, the utility of XRD in the investigation of superconductors like MgB 2 lacking an additional symmetry-breaking structural phase transition is not immediately evident. Nevertheless, high-resolution powder XRD experiments on MgB 2 in combination with maximum entropy method analyses hinted at differences between the electron density distributions at room temperature and 15 K, that is, below the T c of approx. 39 K. The high-resolution single-crystal XRD experiments in combination with multipolar refinements presented here can reproduce these results but show that the observed temperature-dependent density changes are almost entirely due to a decrease of atomic displacement parameters as a natural consequence of a reduced thermal vibration amplitude with decreasing temperature. Our investigations also shed new light on the presence or absence of magnesium vacancies in MgB 2 samples–a defect type claimed to control the superconducting properties of the compound. Here, we propose that previous reports on the tendency of MgB 2 to form non-stoichiometric Mg 1–x B 2 phases (1 – x ~ 0.95) during high-temperature (HT) synthesis might result from the interpretation of XRD data of insufficient resolution and/or usage of inflexible refinement models. Indeed, advanced refinements based on an Extended Hansen–Coppens multipolar model and high-resolution X-ray data, which consider explicitly the contraction of core and valence shells of the magnesium cations, do not provide any significant evidence for the formation of non-stoichiometric Mg 1–x B 2 phases during HT synthesis.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2019

Mysterious SiB 3 : Identifying the Relation between α- and β-SiB 3

Binary silicon boride SiB 3 has been reported to occur in two forms, as disordered and nonstoichiometric α-SiB 3–x , which relates to the α-rhombohedral phase of boron, and as strictly ordered and stoichiometric β-SiB 3 . Similar to other boron-rich icosahedral solids, these SiB 3 phases represent potentially interesting refractory materials. However, their thermal stability, formation conditions, and thermodynamic relation are poorly understood. Here, we map the formation conditions of α-SiB 3–x and β-SiB 3 and analyze their relative thermodynamic stabilities. α-SiB 3–x is metastable (with respect to β-SiB 3 and Si), and its formation is kinetically driven. Pure polycrystalline bulk samples may be obtained within hours when heating stoichiometric mixtures of elemental silicon and boron at temperatures 1200–1300 °C. At the same time, α-SiB 3–x decomposes into SiB6 and Si, and optimum time-temperature synthesis conditions represent a trade-off between rates of formation and decomposition. The formation of stable β-SiB 3 was observed after prolonged treatment (days to weeks) of elemental mixtures with ratios Si/B = 1:1–1:4 at temperatures 1175–1200 °C. The application of high pressures greatly improves the kinetics of SiB 3 formation and allows decoupling of SiB 3 formation from decomposition. Quantitative formation of β-SiB 3 was seen at 1100 °C for samples pressurized to 5.5–8 GPa. β-SiB 3 decomposes peritectoidally at temperatures between 1250 and 1300 °C. The highly ordered nature of β-SiB 3 is reflected in its Raman spectrum, which features narrow and distinct lines. In contrast, the Raman spectrum of α-SiB 3–x is characterized by broad bands, which show a clear relation to the vibrational modes of isostructural, ordered B 6 P. The detailed composition and structural properties of disordered α-SiB 3–x were ascertained by a combination of single-crystal X-ray diffraction and 29 Si magic angle spinning NMR experiments. Notably, the compositions of polycrystalline bulk samples (obtained at T ≤ 1200 °C) and single crystal samples (obtained from Si-rich molten Si–B mixtures at T > 1400 °C) are different, SiB 2.93(7) and SiB 2.64(2) , respectively. The incorporation of Si in the polar position of B 12 icosahedra results in highly strained cluster units. This disorder feature was accounted for in the refined crystal structure model by splitting the polar position into three sites. The electron-precise composition of α-SiB 3–x is SiB 2.5 and corresponds to the incorporation of, on average, two Si atoms in each B 12 icosahedron. Accordingly, α-SiB 3–x constitutes a mixture of B 10 Si 2 and B 11 Si clusters. The structural and phase stability of α-SiB 3–x were explored using a first-principles cluster expansion. The most stable composition at 0 K is SiB 2.5 , which however is unstable with respect to the decomposition β-SiB 3 + Si. Modeling of the configurational and vibrational entropies suggests that α-SiB 3–x only becomes more stable than β-SiB 3 at temperatures above its decomposition into SiB 6 and Si. Hence, we conclude that α-SiB 3–x is metastable at all temperatures. Density functional theory electronic structure calculations yield band gaps of similar size for electron-precise α-SiB 2.5 and β-SiB 3 , whereas α-SiB 3 represents a p-type conductor.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗