Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Sandford, M. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Sandford, M. C..

26 records · Page 2

Experimental parametric studies of transonic T-tail flutter

Wind-tunnel tests of the T-tail of a wide-body jet airplane were made at Mach numbers up to 1.02. The model consisted of a 1/13-size scaled version of the T-tail, fuselage, and inboard wing of the airplane. Two interchangeable T-tails were tested, one with design stiffness for flutter-clearance studies and one with reduced stiffness for flutter-trend studies. Transonic antisymmetric-flutter boundaries were determined for the models with variations in: (1) fin-spar stiffness, (2) stabilizer dihedral angle (-5 deg and 0 deg), (3) wing and forward-fuselage shape, and (4) nose shape of the fin-stabilizer juncture. A transonic symmetric-flutter boundary and flutter trends were established for variations in stabilizer pitch stiffness. Photographs of the test configurations are shown.

Ruhlin, C. L.↗

Development and demonstration of a flutter-suppression system using active controls

The application of active control technology to suppress flutter was demonstrated successfully in the transonic dynamics tunnel with a delta-wing model. The model was a simplified version of a proposed supersonic transport wing design. An active flutter suppression method based on an aerodynamic energy criterion was verified by using three different control laws. The first two control laws utilized both leading-edge and trailing-edge active control surfaces, whereas the third control law required only a single trailing-edge active control surface. At a Mach number of 0.9 the experimental results demonstrated increases in the flutter dynamic pressure from 12.5 percent to 30 percent with active controls. Analytical methods were developed to predict both open-loop and closed-loop stability, and the results agreed reasonably well with the experimental results.

Sandford, M. C.↗

Transonic flutter study of a 50.5 deg cropped-delta wing with two rearward-mounted nacelles

Transonic flutter characteristics of three geometrically similar delta-wing models were experimentally determined in the Langley transonic dynamics tunnel at Mach numbers from about 0.6 to 1.2. The models were designed to be simplified versions of an early supersonic transport wing design. The model was an aspect-ratio-1.28 cropped-delta wing with a leadingedge sweep of 50.5 deg. The flutter characteristics obtained for this wing configuration indicated a minimum flutter-speed index near a Mach number of 0.92 and a transonic compressibility dip amounting to about a 27-percent decrease in the flutter-speed index relative to the value at a Mach number of 0.6. Analytical studies were performed for one wing model at Mach numbers of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 by using both doublet-lattice and lifting-surface (kernel-function) unsteady aerodynamic theory. A comparison of the analytical and experimental flutter results showed good agreement at all Mach numbers investigated.

Sandford, M. C.↗

A transonic study of active flutter suppression based on an aerodymamic energy concept

The application of active control technology to the suppression of flutter has been successfully demonstrated in the Langley transonic dynamics tunnel. This study involved the implementation of an aerodynamic-energy criterion to suppress flutter of a simplified delta-wing model. Use of this technique with both leading- and trailing-edge active controls has resulted in an increase in dynamic pressure of 22% above the basic wing flutter point and with only a trailing-edge active control has resulted in an increase in dynamic pressure of 30% above the basic wing flutter point at a Mach number of 0.9. Analytical methods used to predict the open- and closed-loop behavior of the model are also discussed.

Sandford, M. C.↗

Status of two studies on active control of aeroelastic response at NASA Langley Research Center

The application of active control technology to the suppression of flutter was successfully demonstrated during two recent studies in the Langley transonic dynamics tunnel. The first study involved the implementation of an aerodynamic-energy criterion, using both leading- and trailing-edge controls, to suppress flutter of a simplified delta-wing model. Use of this technique resulted in an increase in the flutter dynamic pressure of approximately 12 percent for this model at a Mach number of 0.9. Analytical methods used to predict the open- and closed-loop behavior of the model are also discussed. The second study, which is a joint effort with the Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, was conducted to establish the effect of active flutter suppression on a model of the Boeing B-52 Configured Vehicle (CCV). Some preliminary results of this study indicate significant improvements in the damping associated with the critical flutter mode.

Abel, I.↗

Status of two studies on active control of aeroelastic response

The application of active control technology to the suppression of flutter has been successfully demonstrated during two recent studies in the Langley transonic dynamics tunnel. The first study involved the implementation of an aerodynamic-energy criterion, using both leading- and trailing-edge controls, to suppress flutter of a simplified delta-wing model. Use of this technique has resulted in an increase in the flutter dynamic pressure of approximately 12 percent for this model at a Mach number of 0.9 Analytical methods used to predict the open- and closed-loop behavior of the model are also discussed. The second study, was conducted to establish the effect of active flutter suppression on a model of the Boeing B-52 Control Configured Vehicle (CCV). Some preliminary results of this study indicate significant improvements in the damping associated with the critical flutter mode.

Abel, I.↗