Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Saiz, David J.

Publications and source records attributed to Saiz, David J..

12 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Model-based quantification of margins and uncertainties in metal additive manufacturing for process design and qualification

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) Additive Manufacturing (AM) has the potential to enable the production of components with novel designs and material properties unachievable otherwise. However, process repeatability is a challenge, making qualification ill-defined and greatly reducing the utility of what could be an important manufacturing technology. In this work, a combination of modeling, uncertainty quantification (UQ), and experimentation are used in an effort to predict and bound the range of possible outcomes of the LPBF process. Quantities of interest predicted are melt pool dimensions, microstructure features, and mechanical distortions. A combination of high fidelity thermal-fluid models, microstructure growth models, and reduced fidelity, rapid thermal and mechanical models are used. Uncertainty propagation techniques are used to predict probability distributions of quantities of interest from estimates of process uncertainties. Repeated experiments are done to quantify observed probability distributions and compared to predicted distributions to determine if predictions are precise and accurate. Novel modeling methods are microstrucutre characterization techniques are also discussed. It is found that high fidelity models do a generally good job bounding experimentally observed melt pool morphologies for both bead-on-plate and powder bed cases. Microstructure models are able to bound a number of experimentally observed microstructure statistics, but with low precision due to challenges with calibrating the microstructure growth model parameters. A developed modified inherent strain distortion model does not accurately predict observed distortions. A lumped laser distortion model shows promise in being both accurately and precisely bounding observed outcomes from the deflection comb build, but requires further evaluation on more builds and geometries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Optimization of stochastic feature properties in laser powder bed fusion

Process parameter selection in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) controls the as-printed dimensional tolerances, pore formation, surface quality and microstructure of printed metallic structures. Measuring the stochastic mechanical performance for a wide range of process parameters is cumbersome both in time and cost. As such, in this study, we overcome these hurdles by using high-throughput tensile (HTT) testing of over 250 dogbone samples to examine process-driven performance of strut-like small features, ~1 mm 2 in austenitic stainless steel (316 L). The output mechanical properties, porosity, surface roughness and dimensional accuracy were mapped across the printable range of laser powers and scan speeds using a continuous wave laser LPBF machine. Tradeoffs between ductility and strength are shown across the process space and their implications are discussed. While volumetric energy density deposited onto a substrate to create a melt-pool can be a useful metric for determining bulk properties, it was not found to directly correlate with output small feature performance.

316 L stainless steel↗
DOE OSTI2022

Process and feedstock driven microstructure for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel

Here in the pursuit of improving additively manufactured (AM) component quality and reliability, fine-tuning critical process parameters such as laser power and scan speed is a great first step toward limiting defect formation and optimizing the microstructure. However, the synergistic effects between these process parameters, layer thickness, and feedstock attributes (e.g. powder size distribution) on part characteristics such as microstructure, density, hardness, and surface roughness are not as well-studied. In this work, we investigate 316L stainless steel density cubes built via laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), emphasizing the significant microstructural changes that occur due to altering the volumetric energy density (VED) via laser power, scan speed, and layer thickness changes, coupled with different starting powder size distributions. This study demonstrates that there is not one ideal process set and powder size distribution for each machine. Instead, there are several combinations or feedstock/process parameter ‘recipes’ to achieve similar goals. This study also establishes that for equivalent VEDs, changing powder size can significantly alter part density, GND density, and hardness. Through proper parameter and feedstock control, part attributes such as density, grain size, texture, dislocation density, hardness, and surface roughness can be customized, thereby creating multiple high-performance regions in the AM process space.

316L stainless steel↗