Bleed Roughness Mechanism
Suction applied through wall bleed is expected to reduce boundary-layer thickness and lead to a profile that can resist separation. However, experiments with rows of suction holes or slots have shown that the benefits of suction are not realized under certain circumstances. Lee, Sloan and Paynter attributed this to a 'bleed roughness', and modeled the phenomena using a modified inner-length scale with convective lag for the eddy viscosity. Test information was required to determine the roughness values at each Mach number and bleed rate. The present work used numerical calculation, subsonic and supersonic experimentation, and physical modeling were used to explore bleed roughness. It was found that the phenomena can exist in the absence of bleed, that it is a function of geometry and Mach number, and that it does not appear in low subsonic flow. The inner-length scale/convective lag approach was found to be inconsistent with recent physical observation. Alternate steady models for the roughness effect disagreed with mass flux trends and the choked flow limit, and suggested that non-steady mechanisms are present. While new supersonic experiments did exhibit low-frequency plenum oscillations, high-frequency unsteadiness associated with the orifice flow scale appears to be the cause of bleed roughness. In fact, boundary-layer calculations with an oscillatory orifice flow produced the same effect in the time-averaged downstream profile for incompressibile flow. A new empirical turbulence-model was proposed which increased the eddy viscosity throughout the entire boundary-layer by a constant which was calibrated using the zero-bleed profile. Preliminary calculations agreed with the experimental data. The model significantly reduced the test information required to determine roughness values for turbulence modeling, and provided prediction capability for supersonic bleed flows. An abstract of a thesis entitled 'Boundary-Layer Bleed Roughness' is included.