Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Rudisill, T. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Rudisill, T. S..

Flowsheet for the Neutralization of Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) Material

Under the Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) program H-Canyon will be dissolving aluminum spent nuclear fuel (ASNF) and then neutralizing that solution without performing head-end strike or uranium recovery operations. After dissolution in H-Canyon the material will be neutralized to a free hydroxide concentration of either 0.6 M or 1.2 M to meet the waste acceptance criteria for transfer to the SRS Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facility (CSTF). In order to ensure the material could be successfully neutralized and transferred, SRNL completed experiments with simulated H-Canyon dissolver solutions. Two bounding simulants were developed based on the expected compositions of ASNF to be dissolved, one containing only Gd as the neutron poison and one containing Fe as an additional poison.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Analysis of H-Canyon 6.4D Dissolver Solid

During reconfiguration of the 6.4D dissolver for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel, solid material was observed on the bottom of the dissolver pot. Samples of the solids were taken from the north and south side of the 6.4D pot and were transported to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) for characterization. The samples were initially dried, and then a small portion of each sample set was removed, and rinsed with either 1 M HNO 3 or 6 M HNO 3 . A portion of each unrinsed and rinsed sample was dissolved and analyzed for elemental and radiochemical concentrations. Results from the analyses indicated that the solids were primarily Si, Fe, Al, and Cr. The U content in the initial dried, unrinsed solids was 0.380 wt %, but was reduced to 0.057 wt % in the rinsed solids, indicating the majority of the U was mostly soluble in HNO 3 . Small amounts of Pu were measured at 0.010 wt % in both the rinsed and unrinsed solids.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Dissolution Flowsheet for U-10Mo Scrap Generated from the Fabrication of High Performance Research Reactor Fuel

The Savannah River National Laboratory was requested to develop dissolution flowsheets for low enriched uranium scrap streams generated during the fabrication of high performance research reactor (HPRR)fuel. The scrap streams include U-10Mo-Zr foil and rejected Al-clad plates. Co-rolled U-10Mo-Zr foils and Alclad U-10Mo-Zr mini-plates which have been through the hot isostatic pressing process were obtained from BWX Technologies, Inc. for use in this work. Small-scale dissolution experiments were performed to identify the flowsheet conditions required to safely and efficiently dissolve the fuel fabrication scrap for subsequent U recovery. Experiments were performed to demonstrate the dissolution of the U-10Mo-Zr foil, removal of the Al cladding from the mini-plates, and the dissolution of the mini-plates following cladding removal.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Demonstration of Chemical Decladding and Disposition Options for Non-Al Clad Fuels in H-Canyon

Aqueous disposition of non-Al clad fuels was studied in order to determine if H-Canyon would be a viable disposition option for this type of L-Basin fuel. A review of the L-Basin fuel types and its condition was done suggesting two major cladding types, Zircaloy and 304L stainless steel needed to be studied. Dissolution flowsheets options were reviewed. Sulfex and Zirflex processes were chosen as best for H-Canyon integration. Both process flowsheets were demonstrated on a lab scale to determine decladding rate, and off-gas and waste production. The resulting data suggested decladding in H-Canyon was an option but dissolver corrosion as well as off-gas and waste generation needed to be addressed. Small scale dissolution in a hot cell of smaller damaged fuel is a viable option with the flowsheets tested.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Dissolution of Used Nuclear Fuel using a TBP/n-paraffin Solvent

The complete recycle of used nuclear fuel (UNF) is desirable to recover the energy value from the remaining U and the higher actinides produced during fuel irradiation; however, the construction of a large-scale reprocessing facility is prohibitively expensive. A simplified flowsheet with a reduced equipment footprint is needed to improve the economic viability. To address this issue, we evaluated a hybrid process which combines the dissolution of UNF pretreated (oxidized) for tritium removal in a tributyl phosphate (TBP) solvent with the solvent extraction cycles required for recovery of the actinide and lanthanide elements. To demonstrate the feasibility of the hybrid process, we prepared actinide solid solutions containing selected fission product elements as surrogates for pretreated, irradiated light water reactor fuel. The distribution of the actinide and fission product elements was measured between the solvent and residual solids to determine dissolution efficiencies. Dissolution of the solid solutions in the TBP solvent was effective for the recovery of both the actinide and lanthanide elements. An increase in the TBP concentration and temperature improved the dissolution efficiencies for these elements. Two-stage dissolutions were successfully used to recover nearly all the actinides and most of the lanthanides from the solid solutions. Our data indicate that most of the fission products generated during fuel irradiation except for the lanthanides and Tc (based on data for Re) would remain in the undissolved solids. The Am/Cm, lanthanides, and other fission product are easily scrubbed from the solvent by contact with nitric acid generating a pure U/Np/Pu stream.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Optimized Dissolution Flowsheet for Uranium Metal

The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has entered into cooperative agreements with commercial businesses to establish a reliable domestic source of 99 Mo that will be produced without the use of highly enriched uranium (HEU).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Dissolution of Material Test Reactor Fuel in an H-Canyon Dissolver

In an amended record of decision for the management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Savannah River Site, the US Department of Energy has authorized the dissolution and recovery of U from 1000 bundles of Al-clad SNF. The SNF is fuel from domestic and foreign research reactors and is typically referred to as Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuel. Bundles of MTR fuel containing assemblies fabricated from U-Al alloys (or other U compounds) are currently dissolved using a Hg-catalyzed HNO 3 flowsheet. Since the development of the existing flow sheet, improved experimental methods have been developed to more accurately characterize the offgas composition and generation rate during laboratory dissolutions. Recently, these new techniques were successfully used to develop a flowsheet for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel. Using the data from the HFIR dissolution flowsheet development and necessary laboratory experiments, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to define flowsheet conditions for the dissolution of MTR fuels. With improved offgas characterization techniques, SRNL will be able define the number of bundles of fuel which can be charged to an H-Canyon dissolver with much less conservatism.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Dissolution of Used Nuclear Fuel Using a TBP/N-Paraffin Solvent

The dissolution of unirradiated used nuclear fuel (UNF) pellets pretreated for tritium removal was demonstrated using a tributly phosphate (TBP) solvent. Dissolution of pretreated fuel in TBP could potentially combine dissolution with two cycle of solvent extraction required for separating the actinides and lanthanides from other fission products. Dissolutions were performed using UNF surrogates prepared from both uranyl nitrate and uranium trioxide produced from the pretreatment process by adding selected actinide and stable fission product elements. In laboratory-scale experiments, the U dissolution efficiency ranged from 80-99+% for both the nitrate and oxide surrogate fuels. On average, 80% of the Pu and 50% of the Np and Am in the nitrate surrogate dissolved; however, little of the transuranic elements dissolved in the oxide form. The majority of the 3+ lanthanide elements dissolved. Only small amounts of Sr (0-1.6%) and Mo (0.1-1.7%) and essentially no Cs, Ru, Zr, or Pd dissolved.

##CAI suggestions##↗

Dissolution of Material and Test reactor Fuel in an H-Canyon Dissolver

In an amended record of decision for the management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at the Savannah River Site, the US Department of Energy has authorized the dissolution and recovery of U from 1000 bundles of Al-clad SNF. The SNF is fuel from domestic and foreign research reactors and is typically referred to as Material Test Reactor (MTR) fuel. Bundles of MTR fuel containing assemblies fabricated from U-Al alloys (or other U compounds) are currently dissolved using a Hg-catalyzed HNO3 flowsheet. Since the development of the existing flowsheet, improved experimental methods have been developed to more accurately characterize the offgas composition and generation rate during laboratory dissolutions. Recently, these new techniques were successfully used to develop a flowsheet for the dissolution of High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel. Using the data from the HFIR dissolution flowsheet development and necessary laboratory experiments, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to define flowsheet conditions for the dissolution of MTR fuels. With improved offgas characterization techniques, SRNL will be able define the number of bundles of fuel which can be charged to an H-Canyon dissolver with much less conservatism.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Dissolution Flowsheet for High Flux Isotope Reactor Fuel

As part of the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) processing campaign, H-Canyon is planning to begin dissolving High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) fuel in late FY17 or early FY18. Each HFIR fuel core contains inner and outer fuel elements which were fabricated from uranium oxide (U 3 O 8 ) dispersed in a continuous Al phase using traditional powder metallurgy techniques. Fuels fabricated in this manner, like other SNF’s processed in H-Canyon, dissolve by the same general mechanisms with similar gas generation rates and the production of H 2 . The HFIR fuel cores will be dissolved and the recovered U will be down-blended into low-enriched U. HFIR fuel was previously processed in H-Canyon using a unique insert in both the 6.1D and 6.4D dissolvers. Multiple cores will be charged to the same dissolver solution maximizing the concentration of dissolved Al. The objective of this study was to identify flowsheet conditions through literature review and laboratory experimentation to safely and efficiently dissolve the HFIR fuel in H-Canyon. Laboratory-scale experiments were performed to evaluate the dissolution of HFIR fuel using both Al 1100 and Al 6061 T6 alloy coupons. The Al 1100 alloy was considered a representative surrogate which provided an upper bound on the generation of flammable (i.e., H 2 ) gas during the dissolution process. The dissolution of the Al 6061 T6 alloy proceeded at a slower rate than the Al 1100 alloy, and was used to verify that the target Al concentration in solution could be achieved for the selected Hg concentration. Mass spectrometry and Raman spectroscopy were used to provide continuous monitoring of the concentration of H 2 and other permanent gases in the dissolution offgas, allowing the development of H 2 generation rate profiles. The H 2 generation rates were subsequently used to evaluate if a full HFIR core could be dissolved in an H-Canyon dissolver without exceeding 60% of the calculated lower flammability limit (LFL) for H 2 at a given Hg concentration. Complete dissolution of the Al 1100 and Al 6061 T6 alloys up to a final Al concentration of 2 M was obtained using a 7 M HNO 3 solution containing a 0.002 M Hg catalyst. However, following the dissolutions, solids were observed in the solution. The solids were amorphous, but likely originated from the Si present in the alloys. No crystalline materials, such as Al(NO 3 ) 3 were observed. During the course of the dissolution experiments, it was determined that delaying the addition of Hg once the HNO 3 solution reached the boiling point can reduce the total offgas and H 2 generation rates. The delay in starting the Hg addition is not necessary for HFIR fuel dissolution, but could be useful in other research reactor dissolution campaigns. The potential to generate flammable concentrations of H 2 in the offgas during a HFIR fuel dissolution was evaluated using the experimental data. The predicted H 2 concentration in the dissolver offgas stream was compared with 60% of the calculated H 2 LFL at 200 °C using several prototypical experiments. The calculations showed that a full HFIR core can be dissolved using nominally 0.002 M Hg to catalyze the dissolution. The margin between the predicted H 2 concentration and the calculated LFL was greater when the solution was allowed to boil for 45 min prior to initiating the Hg addition. When the Hg was increased to 0.004 M, the predicted H 2 concentration exceeded the calculated LFL early in the dissolution. The dissolution experiments also demonstrated that additional Hg (beyond the initial 0.002 M) could be added as the Al concentration increases. The ability to add more Hg during a HFIR fuel dissolution could be beneficial if slow dissolution rates are observed at high Al concentrations. Experimental data were used to demonstrate that the predicted H 2 concentration in a dissolver was below 60% of the calculated LFL at 200 °C when 0.004 M Hg was used to catalyze the dissolution if the Al concentration is conservatively greater than 0.5 M. Data also show that the Hg concentration during a HFIR fuel dissolution can be increased from 0.002 to 0.008 M at an Al concentration of 1.3 M.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Low temperature dissolution flowsheet for plutonium metal

The H-Canyon flowsheet used to dissolve Pu metal for PuO 2 production utilizes boiling HNO 3 . SRNL was requested to develop a complementary dissolution flowsheet at two reduced temperature ranges. The dissolution and H 2 generation rates of Pu metal were investigated using a dissolving solution at ambient temperature (20-30 °C) and for an intermediate temperature of 50-60 °C. Additionally, the testing included an investigation of the dissolution rates and characterization of the off-gas generated from the ambient temperature dissolution of carbon steel cans and the nylon bags that contain the Pu metal when charged to the dissolver.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗