Engineering topics

Richard, R. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Richard, R. M..

3 records

NASA NTRS1989

The flexure assembly design for the SIRTF one-meter primary mirror

A titanium flexure assembly for the Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF) 1-m primary mirror has been designed to accommodate: (1) the cryogenic cool-down effect on the optical performance of the mirror, (2) the Shuttle launch-load environment, and (3) the support-baseplate manufacturing tolerances. Numerous iterations involving a multidimensional design space search led to an assembly design that provides the stiffness and strength in the vertical (optical axis) and tangential directions to accommodate launch loads, but is compliant radially to accommodate cryogenic cool down. A 'folded back' titanium flexure system was required because of the differential thermal contraction of the aluminum telescope baseplate support and the fused-silica mirror. This unique and innovative flexure assembly represents a totally passive mechanism for accommodating the design launch loads, cryogenic cool down, and out-of-plane baseplate effects.

Richard, R. M.↗

NASA NTRS1984

A mirror mount for cryogenic environments

The finite element method was used to study the effect of mount-induced aberrations on the optical surface of a lightweight double arch mirror subjected to cryogenic temperatures. The mount design was controlled by the requirements imposed on the optical surface quality and stress levels. The finite element analysis was used to define the feasible range of mount parameters and the selection of a design within the feasible region. The final design consisted of three spring-loaded Invar T-clamps that uniquely define the location of the mirror, three radially compliant parallel spring guides that remove the effect of radial contraction of structure in cryogenic temperatures, and a flexible baseplate that was used to reduce the effect of temperature-induced baseplate tilt errors. The experimental results from the application of this system to an existing 20-inch fused silica double arch mirror are shown, and possible improvements in system performance are discussed.

Iraninejad, B.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Optimum shapes for lightweighted mirrors

Two types of monolithic lightweight mirrors with arched backs, the center-supported single arch and the ring-supported double arch, are discussed. It is shown that, assuming a maximum permissible rms tolerance of 6 x 10 to the -6th in, the single arch mirror weighs about 50 percent of an equivalent solid mirror up to a diameter of 24 in. The single arch is relatively simple to construct and uses a simple center support. Where a better figure is required, or for larger sizes, the double arch is superior in performance to the single arch. The weight of the double arch will vary from about 50 to under 40 percent of an equivalent conventional mirror as the diameter is increased from 20 to 144 in. Further weight reduction for the double arch is possible through the reduction of the size of the support.

Vukobratovich, D.↗