Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Reddy, T. S. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Reddy, T. S. R..

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2001

Gust Response Analysis of a Turbine Cascade

A study was made of the gust response of an annular turbine cascade using a two-dimensional Navier Stokes code. The time-marching CFD code, NPARC, was used to calculate the unsteady forces due to the fluid flow. The computational results were compared with a previously published experimental data for the annular cascade reported in the literature. Reduced frequency, Mach number and angle of incidence were varied independently and the gust velocity was sinusoidal. For the high inlet velocity case, the cascade was nearly choked.

Gorla, R. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Unsteady Cascade Aerodynamic Response Using a Multiphysics Simulation Code

The multiphysics code Spectrum(TM) is applied to calculate the unsteady aerodynamic pressures of oscillating cascade of airfoils representing a blade row of a turbomachinery component. Multiphysics simulation is based on a single computational framework for the modeling of multiple interacting physical phenomena, in the present case being between fluids and structures. Interaction constraints are enforced in a fully coupled manner using the augmented-Lagrangian method. The arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method is utilized to account for deformable fluid domains resulting from blade motions. Unsteady pressures are calculated for a cascade designated as the tenth standard, and undergoing plunging and pitching oscillations. The predicted unsteady pressures are compared with those obtained from an unsteady Euler co-de refer-red in the literature. The Spectrum(TM) code predictions showed good correlation for the cases considered.

Lawrence, C.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Flutter and Forced Response Analyses of Cascades using a Two-Dimensional Linearized Euler Solver

Flutter and forced response analyses for a cascade of blades in subsonic and transonic flow is presented. The structural model for each blade is a typical section with bending and torsion degrees of freedom. The unsteady aerodynamic forces due to bending and torsion motions. and due to a vortical gust disturbance are obtained by solving unsteady linearized Euler equations. The unsteady linearized equations are obtained by linearizing the unsteady nonlinear equations about the steady flow. The predicted unsteady aerodynamic forces include the effect of steady aerodynamic loading due to airfoil shape, thickness and angle of attack. The aeroelastic equations are solved in the frequency domain by coupling the un- steady aerodynamic forces to the aeroelastic solver MISER. The present unsteady aerodynamic solver showed good correlation with published results for both flutter and forced response predictions. Further improvements are required to use the unsteady aerodynamic solver in a design cycle.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Aeroelastic Stability and Response of Rotating Structures

A summary of the work performed from 1996 to 1997 is presented. More details can be found in the cited references. This grant led to the development of aeroelastic analyses methods for predicting flutter and forced response in fans, compressors, and turbines using computational

Keith, Theo G., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1997

User's Manual for DuctE3D: A Program for 3D Euler Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Analysis of Ducted Fans

The program DuctE3D is used for steady or unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic analysis of ducted fans. This guide describes the input data required and the output files generated, in using DuctE3D. The analysis solves three dimensional unsteady, compressible Euler equations to obtain the aerodynamic forces. A normal mode structural analysis is used to obtain the aeroelastic equations, which are solved using either the time domain or the frequency domain solution method. Sample input and output files are included in this guide for steady aerodynamic analysis and aeroelastic analysis of an isolated fan row.

Srivastava, R.↗
NASA NTRS1996

User's Guide for MSAP2D: A Program for Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic (Flutter and Forced Response) Analysis of Multistage Compressors and Turbines

This guide describes the input data required for using MSAP2D (Multi Stage Aeroelastic analysis Program - Two Dimensional) computer code. MSAP2D can be used for steady, unsteady aerodynamic, and aeroelastic (flutter and forced response) analysis of bladed disks arranged in multiple blade rows such as those found in compressors, turbines, counter rotating propellers or propfans. The code can also be run for single blade row. MSAP2D code is an extension of the original NPHASE code for multiblade row aerodynamic and aeroelastic analysis. Euler equations are used to obtain aerodynamic forces. The structural dynamic equations are written for a rigid typical section undergoing pitching (torsion) and plunging (bending) motion. The aeroelastic equations are solved in time domain. For single blade row analysis, frequency domain analysis is also provided to obtain unsteady aerodynamic coefficients required in an eigen analysis for flutter. In this manual, sample input and output are provided for a single blade row example, two blade row example with equal and unequal number of blades in the blade rows.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1996

PROP3D: A Program for 3D Euler Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic (Flutter and Forced Response) Analysis of Propellers. Version 1.0

This guide describes the input data required, for steady or unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic analysis of propellers and the output files generated, in using PROP3D. The aerodynamic forces are obtained by solving three dimensional unsteady, compressible Euler equations. A normal mode structural analysis is used to obtain the aeroelastic equations, which are solved using either time domain or frequency domain solution method. Sample input and output files are included in this guide for steady aerodynamic analysis of single and counter-rotation propellers, and aeroelastic analysis of single-rotation propeller.

Srivastava, R.↗
NASA NTRS1996

ASTROP2 Users Manual: A Program for Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Propfans

This manual describes the input data required for using the second version of the ASTROP2 (Aeroelastic STability and Response Of Propulsion systems - 2 dimensional analysis) computer code. In ASTROP2, version 2.0, the program is divided into two modules: 2DSTRIP, which calculates the structural dynamic information; and 2DASTROP, which calculates the unsteady aerodynamic force coefficients from which the aeroelastic stability can be determined. In the original version of ASTROP2, these two aspects were performed in a single program. The improvements to version 2.0 include an option to account for counter rotation, improved numerical integration, accommodation for non-uniform inflow distribution, and an iterative scheme to flutter frequency convergence. ASTROP2 can be used for flutter analysis of multi-bladed structures such as those found in compressors, turbines, counter rotating propellers or propfans. The analysis combines a two-dimensional, unsteady cascade aerodynamics model and a three dimensional, normal mode structural model using strip theory. The flutter analysis is formulated in the frequency domain resulting in an eigenvalue determinant. The flutter frequency and damping can be inferred from the eigenvalues.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1995

User's Guide for ECAP2D: an Euler Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Analysis Program for Two Dimensional Oscillating Cascades, Version 1.0

This guide describes the input data required for using ECAP2D (Euler Cascade Aeroelastic Program-Two Dimensional). ECAP2D can be used for steady or unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic analysis of two dimensional cascades. Euler equations are used to obtain aerodynamic forces. The structural dynamic equations are written for a rigid typical section undergoing pitching (torsion) and plunging (bending) motion. The solution methods include harmonic oscillation method, influence coefficient method, pulse response method, and time integration method. For harmonic oscillation method, example inputs and outputs are provided for pitching motion and plunging motion. For the rest of the methods, input and output for pitching motion only are given.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1993

A Review of Recent Aeroelastic Analysis Methods for Propulsion at NASA Lewis Research Center

This report reviews aeroelastic analyses for propulsion components (propfans, compressors and turbines) being developed and used at NASA LeRC. These aeroelastic analyses include both structural and aerodynamic models. The structural models include a typical section, a beam (with and without disk flexibility), and a finite-element blade model (with plate bending elements). The aerodynamic models are based on the solution of equations ranging from the two-dimensional linear potential equation to the three-dimensional Euler equations for multibladed configurations. Typical calculated results are presented for each aeroelastic model. Suggestions for further research are made. Many of the currently available aeroelastic models and analysis methods are being incorporated in a unified computer program, APPLE (Aeroelasticity Program for Propulsion at LEwis).

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Unsteady aerodynamics and flutter of propfans using a three-dimensional Full-Potential Solver

A full-potential solver coupled with a linear structural dynamics model is used to calculate the unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity of propfans. The solver allows calculations for arbitrary interblade phase angles. Results are presented for two propfan configurations. Good agreement is seen between the full-potential results and results from linear theory since the flow is subsonic and the thickness of the propfan blades is small. Some difficulty is encountered due to wave reflections from outer computational boundaries; however, this does not affect the results in the range of frequencies of aeroelastic interest.

Bakhle, Milind A.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Flutter analysis of supersonic axial flow cascades using a high resolution Euler solver. Part 1: Formulation and validation

This report presents, in two parts, a dynamic aeroelastic stability (flutter) analysis of a cascade of blades in supersonic axial flow. Each blade of the cascade is modeled as a typical section having pitching and plunging degrees of freedom. Aerodynamic forces are obtained from a time accurate, unsteady, two-dimensional cascade solver based on the Euler equations. The solver uses a time marching flux-difference splitting (FDS) scheme. Flutter stability is analyzed in the frequency domain. The unsteady force coefficients required in the analysis are obtained by harmonically oscillating (HO) the blades for a given flow condition, oscillation frequency, and interblade phase angle. The calculated time history of the forces is then Fourier decomposed to give the required unsteady force coefficients. An influence coefficient (IC) method and a pulse response (PR) method are also implemented to reduce the computational time for the calculation of the unsteady force coefficients for any phase angle and oscillation frequency. Part 1, this report, presents these analysis methods and their validation by comparison with results obtained from linear theory for a selected flat plate cascade geometry. A typical calculation for a rotor airfoil is also included to show the applicability of the present solver for airfoil configurations. The predicted unsteady aerodynamic forces for a selected flat plate cascade geometry and flow conditions correlated well with those obtained from linear theory for different interblade phase angles and oscillation frequencies. All the three methods of predicting unsteady force coefficients, namely, HO, IC, and PR, showed good correlations with each other. It was established that only a single calculation with four blade passages is required to calculate the aerodynamic forces for any phase angle for a cascade consisting of any number of blades, for any value of the oscillation frequency. Flutter results, including mistuning effects, for a cascade of stator airfoils are presented in Part 2 of the report.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Flutter analysis of a supersonic cascade in time domain using an ADI Euler solver

The aeroelastic stability of a two-dimensional cascade oscillating in supersonic axial flow is analyzed in the time domain. The aeroelastic model consists of a single degree of freedom typical section structural model for each blade of the cascade and an unsteady two-dimensional cascade aerodynamic model based on the Euler equations. The Euler equations are solved using a time accurate Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) solution scheme. The aeroelastic equations are integrated in time. The effect of interblade phase angle is included in the aeroelastic analysis by an appropriate choice of initial and boundary conditions. Flutter predictions are obtained from the time response of a flat plate cascade in single degree of freedom pitching motion. The results correlate well with those obtained from a separate frequency domain flutter analysis for all values of interblade phase angles considered. Flutter results are then presented for cascades having airfoil sections representative of a supersonic throughflow fan. The validity of the time integration method for a cascade of airfoils at various interblade phase angles is demonstrated.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Aeroelastic analysis of advanced propellers using an efficient Euler solver

A 3D Euler solver is coupled with a 3D structural dynamics model to investigate flutter of propfans. A hybrid scheme is used to reduce computational time for the Euler equations and a normal mode analysis is used for flutter calculations. Experimental and calculated flutter results are compared for an advanced propeller propfan which experienced flutter at transonic tip relative velocities. The predicted flutter calculations are in close agreement with the experimental data. A structural damping value of 0.5 percent was required to predict the behavior observed in the experiment. Computations show that the flutter behavior is dominated by the second mode, but coupling with the first mode is required. The addition of other modes to the calculations did not affect the flutter behavior.

Srivastava, R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Analysis of cascades using a two dimensional Euler aeroelastic solver

A two-dimensional unsteady aerodynamic Euler solver based on a flux differencing scheme is being developed to analyze oscillating cascades. The cascades can have subsonic, transonic, or supersonic flow with either subsonic or supersonic axial velocity. The aerodynamic solver is coupled with a typical section structural model for each blade of the cascade. Flutter analysis methods both in time and frequency domains are then implemented into the resulting aeroelastic solver. Methods that reduce computational time for calculating the unsteady aerodynamic coefficients, namely the influence coefficient method and the pulse response method, are also implemented and validated. The present solver showed good correlation with published results for all the flow regimes. It is shown that grid coarsening improved the accuracy of the predictions. A representative flutter calculation showed that both the frequency domain and time domain methods are implemented correctly into the aeroelastic solver.

Reddy, T. S. R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

A numerical classical flutter analysis of advanced propellers

A three-dimensional Euler solver is coupled with a three-dimensional structural dynamics model to investigate flutter of propfans. An implicit-explicit hybrid scheme is used to reduce computational time for the solution of Euler equations. The aeroelastic equations are formulated in normal modes and are solved for flutter in frequency domain. The required generalized forces are obtained using a pulse response method. Computations show that the instability is dominated by the second mode frequency as was observed in experiment.

Srivastava, R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

APPLE - An aeroelastic analysis system for turbomachines and propfans

This paper reviews aeroelastic analysis methods for propulsion elements (advanced propellers, compressors and turbines) being developed and used at NASA Lewis Research Center. These aeroelastic models include both structural and aerodynamic components. The structural models include the typical section model, the beam model with and without disk flexibility, and the finite element blade model with plate bending elements. The aerodynamic models are based on the solution of equations ranging from the two-dimensional linear potential equation for a cascade to the three-dimensional Euler equations for multi-blade configurations. Typical results are presented for each aeroelastic model. Suggestions for further research are indicated. All the available aeroelastic models and analysis methods are being incorporated into a unified computer program named APPLE (Aeroelasticity Program for Propulsion at LEwis).

Reddy, T. S. R.↗