Engineering Papers⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Radonjic, Mileva

Publications and source records attributed to Radonjic, Mileva.

22 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Mechanical Properties of Nominally Ductile and Brittle Zones within the Caney Shale Formation

We present a case study from the Caney Shale, which is an emerging hydrocarbon-bearing formation in Oklahoma. Open hole logs lead to a nominal distinction of five zones in an exploration well, two of which are designated “ductile” and three of which are designated as less ductile “reservoir” zones. Subsequently, a detailed mechanical characterization was carried out on core plugs taken from each of these zones. Results show nominally “ductile” zones are weaker in terms of UCS, tensile strength, fracture toughness, and confined compressive strength. However, by a variety of brittleness indices, it is found the nominal “ductile” regions do not behave as expected. They are weaker, but not consistently more ductile. Furthermore, some brittleness indices lead to contradictory conclusions. For example, zones which would be considered the most brittle according to the proportion of nonlinear stress-strain behavior prior to failure and/or by indices based on elastic properties would be considered the least brittle according to their internal friction angle.

Benge, Margaret↗
DOE OSTI2021

Connecting Geomechanical Properties with Potential for Proppant Embedment and Production Decline for the Emerging Caney Shale, Oklahoma

The Caney Shale is emerging as a target for hydrocarbon production, creating opportunities to study rock mechanical origins of observed/anticipated challenges to effective and sustained stimulation. Here we examine five subunits within the Caney, two of which are dubbed “ductile” and three of which are dubbed “reservoir” rock types. The “ductile” versus “reservoir” identification is initially based on elastic properties ascertained from well logs. By comparing core-based mechanical tests, it is found nominally ductile and reservoir layers do not differ in terms of brittleness, but instead the nominally ductile layers tend to be weaker and more prone to creep deformation compared to the nominally more brittle reservoir layers. This difference in mechanical properties is shown to generate higher susceptibility to proppant embedment in the weaker and more creep-prone layers. Specifically, over a 5-year period, the creep is expected to have little impact on reservoir layers but is predicted to reduce propped fracture aperture by a factor of 2 in the ductile layers.

Benge, Margaret↗